Food that will someday be illegal

Likely all private control of food will be illegal. People are not intelligent enough to make healthy choices all the time. The way to end food inequality is the same way to end economic inequality. The goverment will be responsible for making sure that food distribution and consumption is equal.

So people will have to go the underworld to buy doughnuts and fried chicken.:confused:

Or just come to my neighborhood.

The guys that sell drugs now will be selling cheeseburgers and fried chicken in the situation Katz described.:lol:
 
You know it's just a matter of time before the Nanny state decides that Bacon is bad....
arrow-down.jpg
 
deep fried french fries. It's all starch. No nutritional value.

Pretty dam good though.
 
If Obamacare becomes law in its current state the govt will be able to tell us what we can and can not buy for any foods...at a federal level that is, the precedent will be set.

Damn right. And fat people, smokers, sickly ones, you STD infested whatever, you'll all be branded economic terrorists and shipped off to prison if you don't shape up and be healthy and stop costing the rest of us money intentionally like that. Defective burdensome humans will become our new enemies.
 
If Obamacare becomes law in its current state the govt will be able to tell us what we can and can not buy for any foods...at a federal level that is, the precedent will be set.

Damn right. And fat people, smokers, sickly ones, you STD infested whatever, you'll all be branded economic terrorists and shipped off to prison if you don't shape up and be healthy and stop costing the rest of us money intentionally like that. Defective burdensome humans will become our new enemies.

what you say does sound a bit crazy....however the government will have that authority if Obamacare is found constitutional while containing a provision that allows the government to penalize you for not purchasing a specific product from a private company.
 
As soon as they replace cash with plastic, you won't be allowed to buy anything potentially harmful to yourself. You will have become property of the communist party and they will regulate production and consumption. And you. It's the fairness religion you know. Everything from food to sperm will be controlled by your dear leader. All hail dear leader, for dear leader knows best for the rest.

Meat. Meat will be made illegal when the next plague breaks out. Did you know meat farming is responsible for influenza every year? Flu shots was their recommended solution, LOL, but that will only make it worse you know. There's all kinds of nasty stuff in meat now, from tumors to countless pharmaceuticals and pesticides. Now fuku seasonings too.

Everyone will eat the party gruel and drink the party brew. All hail dear leader.
 
Organic crops not what dey cracked up to be...
:eusa_shifty:
Study: Most Organic Crops Fall Short on Yields
April 25, 2012 - Lower yields means feeding world organically requires clearing more land
Some organic crops produce nearly as much as conventional agriculture, but most still fall short, according to a new analysis. With a growing world population and limited land available to feed it, the study has implications for the debate on how to feed the world sustainably. But some note there is more to sustainability than just crop yields. Organic advocates say farming without artificial fertilizers and pesticides has less environmental impact.

But skeptics note organic farming generally produces less food per hectare. Lower yields means feeding the world organically would require clearing more land. Deforestation for agriculture is already a major contributor to climate change and biodiversity loss. The new study in Nature looks at how big the gap is between conventional and organic yields.

More productive

The study combines 66 earlier yield studies. “Conventional yields are typically higher than organic yields, but with certain management practices, certain environmental conditions, and certain crop species this yield difference can be quite small,” says lead author and McGill University researcher Verena Seufert. On average, organic crops produced 25 percent less than conventional. Vegetables and cereal crops (maize and wheat, for example) performed worse: 33 and 26 percent, respectively. But organic fruits and other perennials nearly matched conventional yields. So did legume crops like soybeans that produce some of their own fertilizer.

The organic penalty was smaller on organic farms that relied on rainfall, which were 17 percent less productive, compared to irrigated farms, which fell behind by 35 percent. “Under rainfed conditions where water supply varies depending on weather conditions, the organic soil can actually provide water better to the crops because it can capture and maintain this water for longer,” Seufert says.

Harder to manage
 

Forum List

Back
Top