Follow-up to “Innocence of Muslims” set to be Released

[Avatar4321]

You assume I am against free speech if I don't agree with it. You couldn't be further from the truth.

I highly doubt that the speech that is outside the "limits" you think should be placed on speech is speech that you agree with.

 

[Sunni Man]

So called "free speech" was instituted by the Founding Fathers so that average citizens could publicly express their grievances against the government without fear of punishment or imprisonment.

Not to protect pornography and blatant hate speech against iconic religious figures such as Jesus and Muhammad.

 

[laughinReaper]

This just shows that so called "free speech" needs to be reigned in and modified to conform with both reality and morality.

How do you reign in free speech?

Who's reality and who's morality?

 

[laughinReaper]

I do not approve of a film attacking Islam, and I do not approve of film attacking Christianity.

There is no need for such disrespect.

Nor is there any reason to take away someone's right to free speech.

I support free speech - within reason.

then it's not free speech.

 

[laughinReaper]

So called "free speech" was instituted by the Founding Fathers so that average citizens could publicly express their grievances against the government without fear of punishment or imprisonment.

Not to protect pornography and blatant hate speech against iconic religious figures such as Jesus and Muhammad.

They didn't say free speech except for Iconic religious figures, they said free speech. BTW if you think the Founding fathers didn't look at porn think again. Of course it was drawn porn but it's what passed at the time. Ben Franklin was a notorious womanizer.