Follow the money

[Ropey]

President Trump certainly knows how to do that.

China's being softened up big time. Go for the camel's hiding head.

 

[fanger]

Very nice drawing, got any links to back up daniel wultz claim?

 

[Hossfly]

Very nice drawing, got any links to back up daniel wultz claim?

What for?

 

[fanger]

for truth, i know that word maybe alien to you

 

[Hossfly]

for truth, i know that word maybe alien to you

Why don't you find a link? You know, to disprove the claim.

 

[Roudy]

for truth, i know that word maybe alien to you

Why don't you find a link? You know, to disprove the claim.

Why does Sponge Bob Fanger Pants have a hissy fit every time it's beloved Palestinian terrorists are exposed for what they are?

U.S. judge rules Bank of China can be sued in terrorism case

U.S. judge rules Bank of China can be sued in terrorism case

A federal judge ruled Wednesday that the Bank of China may be found liable for supporting terrorism in a case brought by the family of a U.S. citizen killed in a 2006 suicide bombing in Israel.

The unusual 118-page ruling came as Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia denied a request by attorneys for the state-controlled bank, one of China's largest, to have it dropped from the case.

Victims of overseas terrorist attacks are increasingly turning to U.S. courts for restitution. Many are pursuing claims not only against shadowy groups or rogue nations but also against financial institutions with substantial economic interests to defend.

Specifically, the lawsuit claims that in an April 2005 meeting, counterterrorism officials with Israel's prime minister's office demanded that China's central bank and Ministry of Public Security stop the Bank of China from assisting Shurafa, but China "demurred."

In weighing whether the claims against the bank can go forward, Lamberth wrote: "The Court must assume the truth of this allegation, which is plausible because it is reasonable to assume that, although BOC is not directly owned by China . . . China does exert a measure of control over the BOC through China's central bank, the People's Bank of China."

 

[fanger]

https:// danielwultz.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/follow-the-money.jpg

 

[fanger]

for truth, i know that word maybe alien to you

Why don't you find a link? You know, to disprove the claim.

Why does Sponge Bob Fanger Pants have a hissy fit every time it's beloved Palestinian terrorists are exposed for what they are?

U.S. judge rules Bank of China can be sued in terrorism case

U.S. judge rules Bank of China can be sued in terrorism case

A federal judge ruled Wednesday that the Bank of China may be found liable for supporting terrorism in a case brought by the family of a U.S. citizen killed in a 2006 suicide bombing in Israel.

The unusual 118-page ruling came as Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia denied a request by attorneys for the state-controlled bank, one of China's largest, to have it dropped from the case.

Victims of overseas terrorist attacks are increasingly turning to U.S. courts for restitution. Many are pursuing claims not only against shadowy groups or rogue nations but also against financial institutions with substantial economic interests to defend.

Specifically, the lawsuit claims that in an April 2005 meeting, counterterrorism officials with Israel's prime minister's office demanded that China's central bank and Ministry of Public Security stop the Bank of China from assisting Shurafa, but China "demurred."

In weighing whether the claims against the bank can go forward, Lamberth wrote: "The Court must assume the truth of this allegation, which is plausible because it is reasonable to assume that, although BOC is not directly owned by China . . . China does exert a measure of control over the BOC through China's central bank, the People's Bank of China."

How did that work out for them?

American victims of Palestinian terrorism are suing a Chinese bank. Israel is trying to stop them.
The Disastrous Consequences of a Lawsuit by a Terror Victim's Parents

 

[fanger]

President Trump certainly knows how to do that.

China's being softened up big time. Go for the camel's hiding head.

Nine-year landmark fight which riled geopolitics between Israel, China, US ends with a whimper.
Exclusive: Historic case against Bank of China for millions in terror financing dismissed

That was two years ago

 

[Ropey]

Yada, yada.

Avenues closed. No one expects convictions. Even with Hillary.



War takes time. Buildup takes time. This will be a revisited thread. The right person is in it.

No, not me.

 

[Roudy]

for truth, i know that word maybe alien to you

Why don't you find a link? You know, to disprove the claim.

Why does Sponge Bob Fanger Pants have a hissy fit every time it's beloved Palestinian terrorists are exposed for what they are?

U.S. judge rules Bank of China can be sued in terrorism case

U.S. judge rules Bank of China can be sued in terrorism case

A federal judge ruled Wednesday that the Bank of China may be found liable for supporting terrorism in a case brought by the family of a U.S. citizen killed in a 2006 suicide bombing in Israel.

The unusual 118-page ruling came as Chief Judge Royce C. Lamberth of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia denied a request by attorneys for the state-controlled bank, one of China's largest, to have it dropped from the case.

Victims of overseas terrorist attacks are increasingly turning to U.S. courts for restitution. Many are pursuing claims not only against shadowy groups or rogue nations but also against financial institutions with substantial economic interests to defend.

Specifically, the lawsuit claims that in an April 2005 meeting, counterterrorism officials with Israel's prime minister's office demanded that China's central bank and Ministry of Public Security stop the Bank of China from assisting Shurafa, but China "demurred."

In weighing whether the claims against the bank can go forward, Lamberth wrote: "The Court must assume the truth of this allegation, which is plausible because it is reasonable to assume that, although BOC is not directly owned by China . . . China does exert a measure of control over the BOC through China's central bank, the People's Bank of China."

How did that work out for them?

American victims of Palestinian terrorism are suing a Chinese bank. Israel is trying to stop them.
The Disastrous Consequences of a Lawsuit by a Terror Victim's Parents

Brought to you by a fake news site. Ha ha ha. Funny shit!

 

[Roudy]

President Trump certainly knows how to do that.

China's being softened up big time. Go for the camel's hiding head.

Nine-year landmark fight which riled geopolitics between Israel, China, US ends with a whimper.
Exclusive: Historic case against Bank of China for millions in terror financing dismissed

That was two years ago

You are able to distinguish are you not, the difference between identifying a path for funding Palistinian terrorism through a Palestinian piece of shit abusing a bank in China, and whether or not a lawsuit for damages for said criminal behavior occurring across three countries, can bring about justice in monetary damages, given all the diplomatic hurdles involved. Or maybe you're just yet another antisemitic imbecile, pissing in the Internet winds.

 

[fanger]

Yada, yada.

Avenues closed. No one expects convictions. Even with Hillary.



War takes time. Buildup takes time. This will be a revisited thread. The right person is in it.

No, not me.

Ropey and jewland want war, but as always they want others to do the wet work

 

[fanger]

US sent plane with $400 million in cash to Iran - CNNPolitics

• Obama approved the $400 million transfer, which he announced in January
• It was the first payment of a $1.7 billion settlement
• The funds had been contested since the 1979 Iranian revolution
• The $400 million was Iran's to start with, placed into a US-based trust fund to support American military equipment purchases in the 1970s. When the Shah was ousted by a 1979 popular uprising that led to the creation of the Islamic Republic, the US froze the trust fund. Iran has been fighting for a return of the funds through international courts since 1981.
  In announcing the agreement, Obama said that paying the $400 million -- plus $1.3 billion in interest -- was saving American taxpayers billions of dollars. The Iranians had been seeking more than $10 billion at arbitration.
  US sent plane with $400 million in cash to Iran - CNNPolitics