We already had that link. It doesn't give his present political affiliation, if he has one.
And again, the significance whether he has one or not would be a Composition Fallacy anyway. So it's not a matter of "disagree" -- it's a matter of "bullshit".
Actions speak louder than words.
So you admit you're making an ass-sumption with no evidence.
Yeah that's what I already said.
No I didn’t, I am saying I disagree with your conclusion. You seem to think I someone disagrees with your conclusion they are wrong. I don’t see it your way because the evidence doesn’t fit your conclusion. That is my opinion and you have offered nothing to change my opinion.
I don't have a "conclusion" --- you do.
You posted a proper adjective. That's not opinion, that's asserting a fact. And you just admitted you have no evidence for that assertion.
Shall we just run the same thing over again and expect different results?
I don’t agree with you.