ReillyT
Senior Member
Whomever was the front runner at the time, they should have only taken away half the delegates. That was punishment enough. In fact, if what Care has posted is correct, that was what they were compelled to do under their own guidelines.
Care is wrong. There is an additional rule (6(c) or 5(c) I think) that clearly allows them to punish the states to a greater extent than 50%. One can quibble about whether the punishment was too hard, but I understand why they did what they did. Second-guessing at this point seems beyond useless.