Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Even if your supposition is true that he broke the law, it was not treason, do you even know what the Constitution defines as Treason?
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
Iran was an enemy.
Reagan secretly sold arms to Iran.
Treason.
Blood simple.
Was he ever charged with or convicted of treason? If not your claim is bull shit unless of course you subscribe to the guilty till proven innocent legal system.
So if someone is not charged and convicted of treason, they could not possibly have committed it if they were republican?
That's what you're saying right? I want to make this clear.
Well at least Regan didn't blame EVERY problem he had on Carter.
Even if your supposition is true that he broke the law, it was not treason, do you even know what the Constitution defines as Treason?
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
Iran was an enemy.
Reagan secretly sold arms to Iran.
Treason.
Blood simple.
Was he ever charged with or convicted of treason? If not your claim is bull shit unless of course you subscribe to the guilty till proven innocent legal system.
So if someone is not charged and convicted of treason, they could not possibly have committed it if they were republican?
That's what you're saying right? I want to make this clear.
let me answer your question with a question a Republican could have committed treason without ever being charged with or convicted of treason that is what your contending? And if that is what your saying then of course a Democrat can be held to the same standard right? Just for the record given how serious the charge of treason is don't you think someone should actually be charged with it before you accuse them of it no matter what party they belong to only a moron would do otherwise in my opinion.
I like the fact that the democrats will never have a president more accomplished and beloved than Reagan. Whos the best they've got? JFK? Pff. He's a chump compared to Reagan.
Reagan is behind FDR, JFK, Clinton and maybe Obama.
Even if your supposition is true that he broke the law, it was not treason, do you even know what the Constitution defines as Treason?
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
Iran was an enemy.
Reagan secretly sold arms to Iran.
Treason.
Blood simple.