Fiscal Responsibility? $3 MILLION to defend DOMA

[SniperFire]

You do realize that your post is illogical don't you? Keeping people from getting married and extending protections to their families and children is keeping children in "single parent" households.

Facts do not support you.

The weaker the proponents of traditional marriage in a demographic, the more single parent gubmint dependency.


I am always here to help with the facts!


LOL

Oh please, I'd LOVE to see those claims supported by facts.

Are you really that ignorant?

Shall we start with.... oh, .... how about the entire African-American population?

 

[emptystep]

228 of 229 House Republicans found it in their heart to vote for the bill that included money for DOMA. They drew the line at voting for Sandy relief. Only after Republicans put their own house in order they can complain about others.

O couldn't find it in his heart to vote for the katrina relief bill in 2005.

We already addressed that nonsense when you brought that up in another thread. A lie repeated often enough does not become a truth over time.

 

[DiamondDave]

What "other direction" would that be? Is the "fiscally conservative" GOP doing the spending?

No.. congressional and governmental spending for legal issues on legalizing gay marriage, etc....

The wasteful spending goes both ways (no pun intended)

And you have links to these bills, naturally?

Yes.. the opposition is not spending ANYTHING on defending their side... not funding studies to defend their side..

This one by the Reps defending their side of the legal issue is splattercast in the media (like that is a shock)... the other side simple is not...

And if my way would be promoted, there would be legal expenses to eliminate marriage from federal law as well...

 

[jillian]

The #1 coorelating indicator of poverty in America is single parent households.

What could be more fiscally responsible than defending marriage?

That was a rhetorical question. We all know the answer.


LOL

You do realize that your post is illogical don't you? Keeping people from getting married and extending protections to their families and children is keeping children in "single parent" households.

Facts do not support you.

The weaker the proponents of traditional marriage in a demographic, the more single parent gubmint dependency.


I am always here to help with the facts!


LOL

1. you're making up nonsense again.
2. the single largest group on welfare is white single mothers
3. the red states take far more money from the federal system than they put in,
while blue states put in far more than they take.

any more lies you'd like to tell?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

228 of 229 House Republicans found it in their heart to vote for the bill that included money for DOMA. They drew the line at voting for Sandy relief. Only after Republicans put their own house in order they can complain about others.

O couldn't find it in his heart to vote for the katrina relief bill in 2005.

We already addressed that nonsense when you brought that up in another thread. A lie repeated often enough does not become a truth over time.

Yes we saw your kabuki dance but he still voted against the katrina funding along with 10 of his fellow dems.

 

[nodoginnafight]

Unfortunately stupid spending is NOT a partisan issue.
Both parties waste money - but the GOP also loses points in MY book for hypocricy.

 

[SniperFire]

You do realize that your post is illogical don't you? Keeping people from getting married and extending protections to their families and children is keeping children in "single parent" households.

Facts do not support you.

The weaker the proponents of traditional marriage in a demographic, the more single parent gubmint dependency.


I am always here to help with the facts!


LOL

1. you're making up nonsense again.
2. the single largest group on welfare is white single mothers
3. the red states take far more money from the federal system than they put in,
while blue states put in far more than they take.

any more lies you'd like to tell?

The single largest group of welfare single mothers are of course blacks, relative to the population.

It isn't even close.

As a demographic, blacks have the least interest in traditional marriage.

Fail.


LOL

 

[del]

No.. congressional and governmental spending for legal issues on legalizing gay marriage, etc....

The wasteful spending goes both ways (no pun intended)

And you have links to these bills, naturally?

Yes.. the opposition is not spending ANYTHING on defending their side... not funding studies to defend their side..

This one by the Reps defending their side of the legal issue is splattercast in the media (like that is a shock)... the other side simple is not...

And if my way would be promoted, there would be legal expenses to eliminate marriage from federal law as well...

is taxpayer money being spent?

link?

 

[nodoginnafight]

O couldn't find it in his heart to vote for the katrina relief bill in 2005.

We already addressed that nonsense when you brought that up in another thread. A lie repeated often enough does not become a truth over time.

Yes we saw your kabuki dance but he still voted against the katrina funding along with 10 of his fellow dems.

Wrong.
Obama voted against a version of the bill that included increased funding for the Iraq War. He voted FOR the version of the bill (waiving the Stafford Act) that did not include the additional funding for the Iraq War.

The old tried and true trick of linking garbage with good and then claiming your opponent opposed the good, is so old and hackneyed. Are there people still using it??? Only idiots.

 

[emptystep]

We already addressed that nonsense when you brought that up in another thread. A lie repeated often enough does not become a truth over time.

Yes we saw your kabuki dance but he still voted against the katrina funding along with 10 of his fellow dems.

Wrong.
Obama voted against a version of the bill that included increased funding for the Iraq War. He voted FOR the version of the bill (waiving the Stafford Act) that did not include the additional funding for the Iraq War.

The old tried and true trick of linking garbage with good and then claiming your opponent opposed the good, is so old and hackneyed. Are there people still using it??? Only idiots.

Fox should be tax exempt. It's a religion.

 

[nodoginnafight]

Yes we saw your kabuki dance but he still voted against the katrina funding along with 10 of his fellow dems.

Wrong.
Obama voted against a version of the bill that included increased funding for the Iraq War. He voted FOR the version of the bill (waiving the Stafford Act) that did not include the additional funding for the Iraq War.

The old tried and true trick of linking garbage with good and then claiming your opponent opposed the good, is so old and hackneyed. Are there people still using it??? Only idiots.

Fox should be tax exempt. It's a religion.

Do cults count?

 

[DiamondDave]

And you have links to these bills, naturally?

Yes.. the opposition is not spending ANYTHING on defending their side... not funding studies to defend their side..

This one by the Reps defending their side of the legal issue is splattercast in the media (like that is a shock)... the other side simple is not...

And if my way would be promoted, there would be legal expenses to eliminate marriage from federal law as well...

is taxpayer money being spent?

link?

Congresspersons and their staffs efforts in fighting against DOMA etc is being done free of charge?? No link needed to know that.... Repeal of DADT was free?? There was no expense in the legalities of that, distribution literature, legal advice?? PUH-LEASE

We all know that the legal process ain't free no matter the side you are on

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

DOMA is unconstitutional, plain and simple. The government has no business telling someone who they can or cannot marry. It's very hypocritical, yet typical, to see so many "small government" conservatives fight for big government authority, isn't it? Conservatives are no more for small government than so called liberals are. Conservatives love big government as long as they get to control it.

 

[del]

Yes.. the opposition is not spending ANYTHING on defending their side... not funding studies to defend their side..

This one by the Reps defending their side of the legal issue is splattercast in the media (like that is a shock)... the other side simple is not...

And if my way would be promoted, there would be legal expenses to eliminate marriage from federal law as well...

is taxpayer money being spent?

link?

Congresspersons and their staffs efforts in fighting against DOMA etc is being done free of charge?? No link needed to know that.... Repeal of DADT was free?? There was no expense in the legalities of that, distribution literature, legal advice?? PUH-LEASE

We all know that the legal process ain't free no matter the side you are on

you should have no trouble coming up with a link with an amount spent by the govt fighting doma, then, right?

i'll wait

 

[DiamondDave]

is taxpayer money being spent?

link?

Congresspersons and their staffs efforts in fighting against DOMA etc is being done free of charge?? No link needed to know that.... Repeal of DADT was free?? There was no expense in the legalities of that, distribution literature, legal advice?? PUH-LEASE

We all know that the legal process ain't free no matter the side you are on

you should have no trouble coming up with a link with an amount spent by the govt fighting doma, then, right?

i'll wait

Yeah... when the media does not splattercast that, it is not easy to find exact numbers.... but to think there is not funding and spending on both sides is ludicrous... defense in the other direction does not come from fairy dust (NPI)

The programs are there, the efforts are there.. even if the full cost is not being put out there for political points..
House Democrats Seek Federal Health Benefits for Same-Sex Partners - California Healthline


Agenda pushing costs money on both sides..

 

[LordBrownTrout]

We already addressed that nonsense when you brought that up in another thread. A lie repeated often enough does not become a truth over time.

Yes we saw your kabuki dance but he still voted against the katrina funding along with 10 of his fellow dems.

Wrong.
Obama voted against a version of the bill that included increased funding for the Iraq War. He voted FOR the version of the bill (waiving the Stafford Act) that did not include the additional funding for the Iraq War.

The old tried and true trick of linking garbage with good and then claiming your opponent opposed the good, is so old and hackneyed. Are there people still using it??? Only idiots.

Sorry but those aren't the rules. We're supposed to excoriate the Rs for not voting for sandy relief and a pork laden bill but we're to forgive Os vote against katrina relief just because he didnt want to fund the troops? Hate to break it to you but not everyone has made the pilgrimage to 0's cum dumpster.

 

[bodecea]

Facts do not support you.

The weaker the proponents of traditional marriage in a demographic, the more single parent gubmint dependency.


I am always here to help with the facts!


LOL

Oh please, I'd LOVE to see those claims supported by facts.

Are you really that ignorant?

Shall we start with.... oh, .... how about the entire African-American population?

What about it?

 

[SniperFire]

Oh please, I'd LOVE to see those claims supported by facts.

Are you really that ignorant?

Shall we start with.... oh, .... how about the entire African-American population?

What about it?

LOL

More proof that the ignorance is bliss.

 

[nodoginnafight]

Yes we saw your kabuki dance but he still voted against the katrina funding along with 10 of his fellow dems.

Wrong.
Obama voted against a version of the bill that included increased funding for the Iraq War. He voted FOR the version of the bill (waiving the Stafford Act) that did not include the additional funding for the Iraq War.

The old tried and true trick of linking garbage with good and then claiming your opponent opposed the good, is so old and hackneyed. Are there people still using it??? Only idiots.

Sorry but those aren't the rules. We're supposed to excoriate the Rs for not voting for sandy relief and a pork laden bill but we're to forgive Os vote against katrina relief just because he didnt want to fund the troops? Hate to break it to you but not everyone has made the pilgrimage to 0's cum dumpster.

Vulgarities aside. I blasted the R's for dragging their feet on the $9.7 billion that included NOTHING but funding for FEMA to pay out claims to people who have been paying their FEMA flood insurance premiums. I blasted Dems for linking non-related spending to the $50 billion bill. And I blast R's for including non-related spending in previous disater relief bills.

So, don't try to excuse your idiocy by claiming someone else was idiotic too.

Didn't work with yer mama when she caught you smoking in fifth grade and it doesn't work now. Grow up.

 

[bodecea]

Are you really that ignorant?

Shall we start with.... oh, .... how about the entire African-American population?

What about it?

LOL

More proof that the ignorance is bliss.

What about "the entire African-American population", Sniperfire?