Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Norm is from the perspective of humans. As long as humans have existed there has been ice at one or both poles so to us that would be normal. The transition from an artificially induced warming trend from an ice age would cause rising seas and the destruction of certain populationsNo. Both of those are just weather. It doesnt become climate until those records become the new norm.Coast-to-coast cold, then a weekend snowstorm possible for South, EastYou would think that after all these years of increasing CO2 and the globe warming up to the point the polar ice caps are melting, there wouldn't be anymore of this below average cold bullshit...Alas, God doesn't play the man made climate change shit, HE does what HE wants and damn the rest of those who think they are mightier than HEA widespread cold snap that will encompass nearly the entire U.S. this week will be followed by a potentially disruptive snowstorm in the South and East by the weekend.
"On Wednesday, temperatures will be near to below average from coast to coast," the National Weather Service said, with some of the most unusual cold expected across the eastern U.S.
Don't you know that it is only climate when it is so hot that records are being broken...when record cold and snow is happening, it is just weather...
Since the temperature record has been so corrupted, exactly how would you identify a new norm? And are you aware, that on earth, ice at one or both poles is not normal..in fact, if you have a polar ice cap on earth, you are officially in an ice age. Ice is the anomaly on earth, not the norm. And why would you object to getting out of an ice age?
Consensus is achieved as a result of the scientific method providing evidence as to the best knowledge available.Achieving consensus is not part of the scientific method.
Yet you accept the existence of black holes, which are accepted by consensus, not by any lab work, your supposed gold standard. This talk of 'scientific method' from an established hypocritical cretin such as yourself is somewhat beyond the pale.
Norm is from the perspective of humans. As long as humans have existed there has been ice at one or both poles so to us that would be normal. The transition from an artificially induced warming trend from an ice age would cause rising seas and the destruction of certain populationsNo. Both of those are just weather. It doesnt become climate until those records become the new norm.Coast-to-coast cold, then a weekend snowstorm possible for South, EastYou would think that after all these years of increasing CO2 and the globe warming up to the point the polar ice caps are melting, there wouldn't be anymore of this below average cold bullshit...Alas, God doesn't play the man made climate change shit, HE does what HE wants and damn the rest of those who think they are mightier than HEA widespread cold snap that will encompass nearly the entire U.S. this week will be followed by a potentially disruptive snowstorm in the South and East by the weekend.
"On Wednesday, temperatures will be near to below average from coast to coast," the National Weather Service said, with some of the most unusual cold expected across the eastern U.S.
Don't you know that it is only climate when it is so hot that records are being broken...when record cold and snow is happening, it is just weather...
Since the temperature record has been so corrupted, exactly how would you identify a new norm? And are you aware, that on earth, ice at one or both poles is not normal..in fact, if you have a polar ice cap on earth, you are officially in an ice age. Ice is the anomaly on earth, not the norm. And why would you object to getting out of an ice age?
Consensus....Bwaaaaahhhaaaaahhaaaaa. Just like a bunch of liberal idiots go into a room, consign that a man with boobs is a women so can go in little girls bathrooms......No, it is 'done' by achieving consensus and calling sceptics 'batshit crazy loons'.Then you know science is not done by either claiming you have "Consensus" or calling skeptics "Deniers"
Can you not read? Oh, what am I saying?And your comparing them to a few local temperature readings a 100 years ago .
Best evidence as long as it doesn't go back to the beginning. Yeah, last 100 years, it sure did warm up, though in the 1970s the libtards sure thought the new ice age was coming...and was wrong then too....Consensus is achieved as a result of the scientific method providing evidence as to the best knowledge available.Achieving consensus is not part of the scientific method.
Yet you accept the existence of black holes, which are accepted by consensus, not by any lab work, your supposed gold standard. This talk of 'scientific method' from an established hypocritical cretin such as yourself is somewhat beyond the pale.
The evidence of black holes is based on observation. Ffs. No wonder batshit crazy loons can't get climate change.Black holes are based on math .
Can you not read? Oh, what am I saying?And your comparing them to a few local temperature readings a 100 years ago .
The evidence of black holes is based on observation. Ffs. No wonder batshit crazy loons can't get climate change.Black holes are based on math .
Have you seen a black hole? I have …The evidence of black holes is based on observation. Ffs. No wonder batshit crazy loons can't get climate change.Black holes are based on math .
Batshit crazy loons will deflect to any unnamed people but climate scientists.Yeah, last 100 years, it sure did warm up, though in the 1970s the libtards sure thought the new ice age was coming...and was wrong then too....
On what is the math based? See that eye observing in your graphic? As though math is not used in every astronomic scientific theory.The evidence of black holes is based on observation. Ffs. No wonder batshit crazy loons can't get climate change.Black holes are based on math .
You retarded moron..
Batshit crazy loons will deflect to any unnamed people but climate scientists.Yeah, last 100 years, it sure did warm up, though in the 1970s the libtards sure thought the new ice age was coming...and was wrong then too....
Figure 1. The number of papers classified as predicting, implying, or providing supporting evidence for future global cooling, warming, and neutral categories. During the period from 1965 through 1979, the PCF08 literature survey found 7 cooling, 20 neutral, and 44 warming papers. (Peterson 2008)
On what is the math based? As though math is not used in every astronomic scientific theory.The evidence of black holes is based on observation. Ffs. No wonder batshit crazy loons can't get climate change.Black holes are based on math .
You retarded moron..
Murph.Wait you said we obseved a black hole..
They're based on observing the reactions of bodies around them. I'm tired of this.Black holes is based on the theroy of dark matter and MATH..
They're based on observing the reactions of bodies around them. I'm tired of this.Black holes is based on the theroy of dark matter and MATH..
Batshit crazy loons will deflect to any unnamed people but climate scientists.Yeah, last 100 years, it sure did warm up, though in the 1970s the libtards sure thought the new ice age was coming...and was wrong then too....
Figure 1. The number of papers classified as predicting, implying, or providing supporting evidence for future global cooling, warming, and neutral categories. During the period from 1965 through 1979, the PCF08 literature survey found 7 cooling, 20 neutral, and 44 warming papers. (Peterson 2008)
The 1970s Global Cooling Zombie Myth and the Tricks Some People Use to Keep it Alive, Part I
It sure was a myth in the 1970s when all those people in the Midwest, northeast and central plains got socked in by that mythical 5 ft of snow. I guess those people in Britain who believed in global warming and died were myths also?he number of papers classified as predicting, implying, or providing supporting evidence for future global cooling, warming, and neutral categories.
Just another FACT that you liberals dont listen to, because when it get really cold outside, instead you turn on your heater and use your car to go fill up on toilet paper, water and wood burning logs for your fireplace.The majority of these deaths were among pensioners - with over-75s accounting for 25,600 winter-related deaths in 2012/13, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said.
Batshit crazy loons will deflect to any unnamed people but climate scientists.Yeah, last 100 years, it sure did warm up, though in the 1970s the libtards sure thought the new ice age was coming...and was wrong then too....
Figure 1. The number of papers classified as predicting, implying, or providing supporting evidence for future global cooling, warming, and neutral categories. During the period from 1965 through 1979, the PCF08 literature survey found 7 cooling, 20 neutral, and 44 warming papers. (Peterson 2008)
The 1970s Global Cooling Zombie Myth and the Tricks Some People Use to Keep it Alive, Part I
