first amendment rights

My, my, Fatality. Another Rushpublican that cannot debate the issue of a known felon bankrolling and supporting the effort to prevent the theft of billions of dollars from the working people of this nation. So you resort to name calling and scatological language. Refuge of the unintelligent, illogical, and those incapable of rational thought.

more of your delusions, time to grow up junior. i realize your developmentally disabled being a product of evolution and descendant of a chimp or monk but youre really going to have to step up and at least pretend to be like the humans.
 
No, Mountain Man, I definately stated that at the town hall meetings there should be hard questions asked. And protestors with signs were allowed at the meetings. However, shutting down the meetings by riotous behaviour is not acceptable, and such people should be forcibly removed and charged for their actions.

I have never stated otherwise. That you are saying that I have reflects on your honesty, not mine.

I said that you indicated it, not that you said it.
Reading comprehension isn't your strong point, is it?

This is not about me, in any case. It is about the Rushpublicans backing a felon that has no respect for the first amendment in this nation or any other. But you dare not address that. It would mean facing the reality of the people that you support.
 
Micheal Moore is a credit to this nation. He has pointed out many facts and realities. That alone makes him the enemy of those that would ignore reality.[/QUOTE]


:cuckoo::cuckoo::lol:
 
My, my, Fatality. Another Rushpublican that cannot debate the issue of a known felon bankrolling and supporting the effort to prevent the theft of billions of dollars from the working people of this nation. So you resort to name calling and scatological language. Refuge of the unintelligent, illogical, and those incapable of rational thought.

more of your delusions, time to grow up junior. i realize your developmentally disabled being a product of evolution and descendant of a chimp or monk but youre really going to have to step up and at least pretend to be like the humans.

But you still cannot address the issue of why you Rushpublicans are supporting the likes of Scott, can you.

We are paying twice as much, per capita, for our health care as the other industrial nations, and getting far less for our money. The system is rife with fraud and corruption, as people like Rick Scott have demonstrated, yet you believe that this is best for America.

Perhaps you should explain why a sysem that can be so easily defrauded by the likes of Scott is the best that we can do. And why the rest of us should support your point of view?
 
No, Mountain Man, I definately stated that at the town hall meetings there should be hard questions asked. And protestors with signs were allowed at the meetings. However, shutting down the meetings by riotous behaviour is not acceptable, and such people should be forcibly removed and charged for their actions.

I have never stated otherwise. That you are saying that I have reflects on your honesty, not mine.

I said that you indicated it, not that you said it.
Reading comprehension isn't your strong point, is it?

This is not about me, in any case. It is about the Rushpublicans backing a felon that has no respect for the first amendment in this nation or any other. But you dare not address that. It would mean facing the reality of the people that you support.

And pray tell, which people do I support?
 
Well, Rushpublicans, are you proud of supporting someone that helps Iran censor the net? Then again, maybe that is what you would like to see here?

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

What you posted about, is not a first amendment violation in this Republic. But, don't let facts get in the way, when trying to smear with such a large partisan brush.
 
When a small group, through riotous behaviour, prevents constituents from speaking to their representatives that is an abridgement of first amendment rights. When the person egging these people on is a felon that has defrauded the US taxpayer of billions, and is currently engaged in aiding two tyranical regimes, Iran and Saudi Arabia, preventing their citizens from getting information from around the world.

Yes, Rick Scott, the head of Conservatives for Patient Rights is purposely pushing the abridgement of first amendment rights here and abroad. Must make you Rushpublicans so damned proud.
 
When a small group, through riotous behaviour, prevents constituents from speaking to their representatives that is an abridgement of first amendment rights. When the person egging these people on is a felon that has defrauded the US taxpayer of billions, and is currently engaged in aiding two tyranical regimes, Iran and Saudi Arabia, preventing their citizens from getting information from around the world.

Yes, Rick Scott, the head of Conservatives for Patient Rights is purposely pushing the abridgement of first amendment rights here and abroad. Must make you Rushpublicans so damned proud.

you gonna cry now?
 
Well Rocks your level of total retardation has now about maxed out. These people at these meetings are shouting because your dipstick leaders won't fucking listen. They are there constitutents which is being made clear by the fact that thanks to the health care debacle everyone from Chris 'sweetheart deal' Dodd to Harry 'land fraud' Reid is suddenly in more political hot water than he's ever been before.
 
When a small group, through riotous behaviour, prevents constituents from speaking to their representatives that is an abridgement of first amendment rights. When the person egging these people on is a felon that has defrauded the US taxpayer of billions, and is currently engaged in aiding two tyranical regimes, Iran and Saudi Arabia, preventing their citizens from getting information from around the world.

Yes, Rick Scott, the head of Conservatives for Patient Rights is purposely pushing the abridgement of first amendment rights here and abroad. Must make you Rushpublicans so damned proud.

I am not a Republican. According to the Constitution, what you are claiming as an infringement of the First Amendment isn't, seeing how Congress has passed no law.

"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."

John Adams, 'Argument in Defense of the Soldiers in the Boston Massacre Trials,' December 1770
 
Last edited:
Well, Rushpublicans, are you proud of supporting someone that helps Iran censor the net? Then again, maybe that is what you would like to see here?

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

What you posted about, is not a first amendment violation in this Republic. But, don't let facts get in the way, when trying to smear with such a large partisan brush.

Rockhead believes in first amendment rights as long as they only apply to liberal socialists like himself.
 

Forum List

Back
Top