Not Since Impeachable Richard Nixon proposed the usury-computing based--Wage and Price inflation combating guidelines: Has there been so much discussion about a Socialist Economy in America! At the time, Senator George McGovern, liberal anti-war Democrat: Would proposed $1000 for every man, woman, and child in America. McGovern didn't win, so the Socialist Ford Administration provided $50.00 rebates, ASAP after getting rid of Impeachable Nixon. (And without even a decent-level poison!)
Within years, Famous economist, John Kenneth Galbraith--Sophomore-level lecturer at Harvard University: Would note in several editorial pages columns that the Reagan deficits were not at all Keynesian.
Socialism had become the centerpiece road to riches in America: US Federal Deficit Spending on the already prosperous. In that decade, defense contractors and their engineers were found to be useful, greedy tools in support of disintegrating the post-war economy.
Case-in-point: The Socialism for the Rich is starting to cede the planet to the North Koreans and the Russians, now post-Cold War, 21st Century. Russian incursions are widely supported by the Socialism for the Rich kind of brand!
The New Deal level Democrats went along: Casting lower incomes off of the US Federal Income Tax rolls. In the 1986 US Tax Reform, the Standard Deduction and Personal Exemptions were raised an equal amount and indexed. The Socialists for the Rich had compared the Horror of the New Deal Democrat Regressive Payroll Tax, summarized in Matthew 25:14-30: With a tax-rebate styled, per child equal amount tax credit as the offset of the horror. After some several centuries--discussed by no post-Gospels editions, any prophets anywhere, Adam Smith, Karl Marx, Keynes, or Milton Friedman: Matthew 20:1-16 was suddenly also in economic policy, if only in the USA. People were starting to get equal amount income adjustments: People were starting to get equal amount adjustments: Regardless if they had worked all the year, or not.
Bush "Socialism for the Rich" Brand had clearly failed to notice that the Tax Adjustment had thrown income-spenders off the tax rolls. Their promise of Matthew 25:14-30, would create failed Tax Cuts, and so failure of adjustable, usury mortgage rates.
The Democrats would create, "The Stimulus," and the "Make Work Pay Refundable Income Tax Credit," in an equal amount per filer adults: Able to eventually be indexed as a National Cost-of-Living Adjustment.
Matthew 20:1-16: was on its way to become normal and expected.
_______________________________________
"Almost two years later, Yang's plan for a universal basic income, which he's calling a "freedom dividend," remains his signature policy proposal. But his impact on the race has increased dramatically - a reality that was on display on Tuesday night when the candidates on stage debated a universal basic income and job losses to automation in depth on national television.
"We have a freedom dividend of $1,000 a month, it recognizes the work in our families and communities. It helps all Americans transition,"' Yang said. "When we put the money into our hands, we can build a trickle up economy from our people, our families and our communities up. It will enable us to do the work that we want to do. This is the sort of vision in response to the fourth industrial revolution that we have to embrace."
Yang has talked about his universal basic income at previous debates. What made Tuesday different was that other candidates - some of whom largely ignored Yang in previous debates - began to seriously debate automation and a basic income.
"'I believe that we need to address a community being impacted by automation,"' said former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julián Castro.
"I agree with my friend Andrew Yang. Universal basic income is a good idea to help provide that security so people can make choices that they want to see," Gabbard said.
But what clearly cemented Yang's rise is that the debate over universal basic income got him into a direct argument with Warren, who said the issue is broader.
After the debate, Yang told CNN that Warren - who, with Biden, is at the top of the Democratic field - had asked him to send her details on his proposal. "'She said she wanted to see the data,"' he said.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred"
(Heavily Moslem, Nigerian: Offers Trader's Moni, actual credit for 2 mil. micro-businesses in equal amounts, a greater equal amount then awardable, on repayment. Interest-free credit it is.--it being a market economy!)
Within years, Famous economist, John Kenneth Galbraith--Sophomore-level lecturer at Harvard University: Would note in several editorial pages columns that the Reagan deficits were not at all Keynesian.
Socialism had become the centerpiece road to riches in America: US Federal Deficit Spending on the already prosperous. In that decade, defense contractors and their engineers were found to be useful, greedy tools in support of disintegrating the post-war economy.
Case-in-point: The Socialism for the Rich is starting to cede the planet to the North Koreans and the Russians, now post-Cold War, 21st Century. Russian incursions are widely supported by the Socialism for the Rich kind of brand!
The New Deal level Democrats went along: Casting lower incomes off of the US Federal Income Tax rolls. In the 1986 US Tax Reform, the Standard Deduction and Personal Exemptions were raised an equal amount and indexed. The Socialists for the Rich had compared the Horror of the New Deal Democrat Regressive Payroll Tax, summarized in Matthew 25:14-30: With a tax-rebate styled, per child equal amount tax credit as the offset of the horror. After some several centuries--discussed by no post-Gospels editions, any prophets anywhere, Adam Smith, Karl Marx, Keynes, or Milton Friedman: Matthew 20:1-16 was suddenly also in economic policy, if only in the USA. People were starting to get equal amount income adjustments: People were starting to get equal amount adjustments: Regardless if they had worked all the year, or not.
Bush "Socialism for the Rich" Brand had clearly failed to notice that the Tax Adjustment had thrown income-spenders off the tax rolls. Their promise of Matthew 25:14-30, would create failed Tax Cuts, and so failure of adjustable, usury mortgage rates.
The Democrats would create, "The Stimulus," and the "Make Work Pay Refundable Income Tax Credit," in an equal amount per filer adults: Able to eventually be indexed as a National Cost-of-Living Adjustment.
Matthew 20:1-16: was on its way to become normal and expected.
_______________________________________
"Almost two years later, Yang's plan for a universal basic income, which he's calling a "freedom dividend," remains his signature policy proposal. But his impact on the race has increased dramatically - a reality that was on display on Tuesday night when the candidates on stage debated a universal basic income and job losses to automation in depth on national television.
"We have a freedom dividend of $1,000 a month, it recognizes the work in our families and communities. It helps all Americans transition,"' Yang said. "When we put the money into our hands, we can build a trickle up economy from our people, our families and our communities up. It will enable us to do the work that we want to do. This is the sort of vision in response to the fourth industrial revolution that we have to embrace."
Yang has talked about his universal basic income at previous debates. What made Tuesday different was that other candidates - some of whom largely ignored Yang in previous debates - began to seriously debate automation and a basic income.
"'I believe that we need to address a community being impacted by automation,"' said former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julián Castro.
"I agree with my friend Andrew Yang. Universal basic income is a good idea to help provide that security so people can make choices that they want to see," Gabbard said.
But what clearly cemented Yang's rise is that the debate over universal basic income got him into a direct argument with Warren, who said the issue is broader.
After the debate, Yang told CNN that Warren - who, with Biden, is at the top of the Democratic field - had asked him to send her details on his proposal. "'She said she wanted to see the data,"' he said.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred"
(Heavily Moslem, Nigerian: Offers Trader's Moni, actual credit for 2 mil. micro-businesses in equal amounts, a greater equal amount then awardable, on repayment. Interest-free credit it is.--it being a market economy!)
Last edited:
