FINALLY: House Judiciary Committee seeks to limit runaway judicial power

[The Purge]

This is killing the DemonRAT...For decades they have relied on activist judges to force their regressive policies down our throats. Now all we need is for the feckless Republicans to stand together united!

Yes, one House committee is finally stepping onto the field in the one-sided battle against judicial tyranny. After years of endless legislative fiat from single district and circuit judges, the House Judiciary Committee is voting this week on a bill that clarifies once and for all that courts do not have the power to issue injunctions against abstract policies and statutes outside the parties before that particular court. Now the only question is whether the Republicans will unite behind a cogent message of keeping legislation within the legislature and place this provision in the budget bill or at least bring it to a vote before the full House and Senate.

(Excerpt) Read more at conservativereview.com

 

[JimBowie1958]

The Constitution and law is already on the side of those opposed to run away federali judges.

The controling mechanism is impeachment and unless the GOP starts holding these idiot judges accountable nothing is ever going to change.

 

[longknife]

Here's the real source for understanding bills @ Injunctive Authority Clarification Act of 2018 (H.R. 6730)

115th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. R. 6730

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

September 7, 2018

Mr. Goodlatte introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit the issuance of national injunctions, and for other purposes.

1.
Short title

This Act may be cited as the Injunctive Authority Clarification Act of 2018.

2.
Orders purporting to restrain enforcement against non-parties

(a)
In general

Chapter 155 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

2285.
Orders purporting to restrain enforcement against non-parties

No court of the United States (and no district court of the Virgin Islands, Guam, or the Northern Mariana Islands) shall issue an order that purports to restrain the enforcement against a non-party of any statute, regulation, order, or similar authority, unless the non-party is represented by a party acting in a representative capacity pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

.

(b)
Clerical amendment

The table of sections for chapter 155 of title 28, United States Code is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 2285 the following:

2285. Orders purporting to restrain enforcement against non-parties.

.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

This is killing the DemonRAT...For decades they have relied on activist judges to force their regressive policies down our throats. Now all we need is for the feckless Republicans to stand together united!

Yes, one House committee is finally stepping onto the field in the one-sided battle against judicial tyranny. After years of endless legislative fiat from single district and circuit judges, the House Judiciary Committee is voting this week on a bill that clarifies once and for all that courts do not have the power to issue injunctions against abstract policies and statutes outside the parties before that particular court. Now the only question is whether the Republicans will unite behind a cogent message of keeping legislation within the legislature and place this provision in the budget bill or at least bring it to a vote before the full House and Senate.

(Excerpt) Read more at conservativereview.com

It is about fucking time these fascist liberal judges are reigned in.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

The Constitution and law is already on the side of those opposed to run away federali judges.

The controling mechanism is impeachment and unless the GOP starts holding these idiot judges accountable nothing is ever going to change.

I always thought when a judge interfered with Trump's decision to prevent travel from some hostile Islamic countries, he should have told them "fuck you, don't interfere with my Article 2 powers as President". Ever hear of a fucking judge interfering with the constitutional duties of the Congress?

 

[RealDave]

This is killing the DemonRAT...For decades they have relied on activist judges to force their regressive policies down our throats. Now all we need is for the feckless Republicans to stand together united!

Yes, one House committee is finally stepping onto the field in the one-sided battle against judicial tyranny. After years of endless legislative fiat from single district and circuit judges, the House Judiciary Committee is voting this week on a bill that clarifies once and for all that courts do not have the power to issue injunctions against abstract policies and statutes outside the parties before that particular court. Now the only question is whether the Republicans will unite behind a cogent message of keeping legislation within the legislature and place this provision in the budget bill or at least bring it to a vote before the full House and Senate.

(Excerpt) Read more at conservativereview.com

Checks & balances. Who needs that crock of shit, Right???? Fuck that worthless piece of paper, The Constitution!!

 

[RealDave]

The Constitution and law is already on the side of those opposed to run away federali judges.

The controling mechanism is impeachment and unless the GOP starts holding these idiot judges accountable nothing is ever going to change.

I always thought when a judge stopped Trump's decision to prevent travel from some hostile Islamic countries, he should have told them "fuck you, don't interfere with my Article 2 powers as President". Ever hear of a fucking judge interfering with the constitutional duties of the Congress?

Trump's " we don't want no Muzzies" is discriminatory. You assholes wish you could legalize discrimination.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Trump's " we don't want no Muzzies" is discriminatory. You assholes wish you could legalize discrimination.

Not every Islamic country is on the list, dumbass. You want Iranian men of military age coming here like the mobs in Europe. Damn, you libtards are fools. In fact, the Constitution allows the President to discriminate.h. And that is a good thing.

 

[Defiant1]

The deference our elected officials pay to judges and courts is un-American.

 

[JimBowie1958]

I always thought when a judge interfered with Trump's decision to prevent travel from some hostile Islamic countries, he should have told them "fuck you, don't interfere with my Article 2 powers as President". Ever hear of a fucking judge interfering with the constitutional duties of the Congress?

The radical Left has not had a reason to go to a federali judge to get a court order to stop the Congress from doing something.

When/if that ever hap[pens they will go to a federali judge to stop it, and they will cherry pick the judge in the 9th circuit area to get it all the way to SCOTUS and tie things up for years./

 

[AvgGuyIA]

This is killing the DemonRAT...For decades they have relied on activist judges to force their regressive policies down our throats. Now all we need is for the feckless Republicans to stand together united!

Yes, one House committee is finally stepping onto the field in the one-sided battle against judicial tyranny. After years of endless legislative fiat from single district and circuit judges, the House Judiciary Committee is voting this week on a bill that clarifies once and for all that courts do not have the power to issue injunctions against abstract policies and statutes outside the parties before that particular court. Now the only question is whether the Republicans will unite behind a cogent message of keeping legislation within the legislature and place this provision in the budget bill or at least bring it to a vote before the full House and Senate.

(Excerpt) Read more at conservativereview.com

Checks & balances. Who needs that crock of shit, Right???? Fuck that worthless piece of paper, The Constitution!!

^^^ Ever notice the insane Left cares about the Constitution when they aren't in power, but shits on it when they are?

 

[AvgGuyIA]

I always thought when a judge interfered with Trump's decision to prevent travel from some hostile Islamic countries, he should have told them "fuck you, don't interfere with my Article 2 powers as President". Ever hear of a fucking judge interfering with the constitutional duties of the Congress?

The radical Left has not had a reason to go to a federali judge to get a court order to stop the Congress from doing something.

When/if that ever hap[pens they will go to a federali judge to stop it, and they will cherry pick the judge in the 9th circuit area to get it all the way to SCOTUS and tie things up for years./

Wait until the GOP has a super majority.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

This is killing the DemonRAT...For decades they have relied on activist judges to force their regressive policies down our throats. Now all we need is for the feckless Republicans to stand together united!

Yes, one House committee is finally stepping onto the field in the one-sided battle against judicial tyranny. After years of endless legislative fiat from single district and circuit judges, the House Judiciary Committee is voting this week on a bill that clarifies once and for all that courts do not have the power to issue injunctions against abstract policies and statutes outside the parties before that particular court. Now the only question is whether the Republicans will unite behind a cogent message of keeping legislation within the legislature and place this provision in the budget bill or at least bring it to a vote before the full House and Senate.

(Excerpt) Read more at conservativereview.com

Checks & balances. Who needs that crock of shit, Right???? Fuck that worthless piece of paper, The Constitution!!

Show us where it says local judges supersede the Congress

 

[RealDave]

This is killing the DemonRAT...For decades they have relied on activist judges to force their regressive policies down our throats. Now all we need is for the feckless Republicans to stand together united!

Yes, one House committee is finally stepping onto the field in the one-sided battle against judicial tyranny. After years of endless legislative fiat from single district and circuit judges, the House Judiciary Committee is voting this week on a bill that clarifies once and for all that courts do not have the power to issue injunctions against abstract policies and statutes outside the parties before that particular court. Now the only question is whether the Republicans will unite behind a cogent message of keeping legislation within the legislature and place this provision in the budget bill or at least bring it to a vote before the full House and Senate.

(Excerpt) Read more at conservativereview.com

Checks & balances. Who needs that crock of shit, Right???? Fuck that worthless piece of paper, The Constitution!!

Show us where it says local judges supersede the Congress

So, you don't know what "checks & balances" refers to?

If Congress would pass a law that said blsck people can't vote & Trump signed it, according to you the Judicial branch can do nothing.

 

[RealDave]

I always thought when a judge interfered with Trump's decision to prevent travel from some hostile Islamic countries, he should have told them "fuck you, don't interfere with my Article 2 powers as President". Ever hear of a fucking judge interfering with the constitutional duties of the Congress?

The radical Left has not had a reason to go to a federali judge to get a court order to stop the Congress from doing something.

When/if that ever hap[pens they will go to a federali judge to stop it, and they will cherry pick the judge in the 9th circuit area to get it all the way to SCOTUS and tie things up for years./

Wait until the GOP has a super majority.

More tax cuts, more debt, wealthy people get wealthier & poor people are thrown under the bus.

 

[Defiant1]

I always thought when a judge interfered with Trump's decision to prevent travel from some hostile Islamic countries, he should have told them "fuck you, don't interfere with my Article 2 powers as President". Ever hear of a fucking judge interfering with the constitutional duties of the Congress?

The radical Left has not had a reason to go to a federali judge to get a court order to stop the Congress from doing something.

When/if that ever hap[pens they will go to a federali judge to stop it, and they will cherry pick the judge in the 9th circuit area to get it all the way to SCOTUS and tie things up for years./

Wait until the GOP has a super majority.

More tax cuts, more debt, wealthy people get wealthier & poor people are thrown under the bus.

At least under the bus, they have a roof over their heads.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

This is killing the DemonRAT...For decades they have relied on activist judges to force their regressive policies down our throats. Now all we need is for the feckless Republicans to stand together united!

Yes, one House committee is finally stepping onto the field in the one-sided battle against judicial tyranny. After years of endless legislative fiat from single district and circuit judges, the House Judiciary Committee is voting this week on a bill that clarifies once and for all that courts do not have the power to issue injunctions against abstract policies and statutes outside the parties before that particular court. Now the only question is whether the Republicans will unite behind a cogent message of keeping legislation within the legislature and place this provision in the budget bill or at least bring it to a vote before the full House and Senate.

(Excerpt) Read more at conservativereview.com

Checks & balances. Who needs that crock of shit, Right???? Fuck that worthless piece of paper, The Constitution!!

Show us where it says local judges supersede the Congress

So, you don't know what "checks & balances" refers to?

If Congress would pass a law that said blsck people can't vote & Trump signed it, according to you the Judicial branch can do nothing.

Checks and Balances is NOT when local judges can just tell Congress, "Nah. We don't think that applies to us"

 

[RealDave]

This is killing the DemonRAT...For decades they have relied on activist judges to force their regressive policies down our throats. Now all we need is for the feckless Republicans to stand together united!

Yes, one House committee is finally stepping onto the field in the one-sided battle against judicial tyranny. After years of endless legislative fiat from single district and circuit judges, the House Judiciary Committee is voting this week on a bill that clarifies once and for all that courts do not have the power to issue injunctions against abstract policies and statutes outside the parties before that particular court. Now the only question is whether the Republicans will unite behind a cogent message of keeping legislation within the legislature and place this provision in the budget bill or at least bring it to a vote before the full House and Senate.

(Excerpt) Read more at conservativereview.com

Checks & balances. Who needs that crock of shit, Right???? Fuck that worthless piece of paper, The Constitution!!

Show us where it says local judges supersede the Congress

So, you don't know what "checks & balances" refers to?

If Congress would pass a law that said blsck people can't vote & Trump signed it, according to you the Judicial branch can do nothing.

Checks and Balances is NOT when local judges can just tell Congress, "Nah. We don't think that applies to us"

Congress CAN NOT bypass the judicial. THAT is checks and balances.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

This is killing the DemonRAT...For decades they have relied on activist judges to force their regressive policies down our throats. Now all we need is for the feckless Republicans to stand together united!

Yes, one House committee is finally stepping onto the field in the one-sided battle against judicial tyranny. After years of endless legislative fiat from single district and circuit judges, the House Judiciary Committee is voting this week on a bill that clarifies once and for all that courts do not have the power to issue injunctions against abstract policies and statutes outside the parties before that particular court. Now the only question is whether the Republicans will unite behind a cogent message of keeping legislation within the legislature and place this provision in the budget bill or at least bring it to a vote before the full House and Senate.

(Excerpt) Read more at conservativereview.com

Checks & balances. Who needs that crock of shit, Right???? Fuck that worthless piece of paper, The Constitution!!

Show us where it says local judges supersede the Congress

So, you don't know what "checks & balances" refers to?

If Congress would pass a law that said blsck people can't vote & Trump signed it, according to you the Judicial branch can do nothing.

Checks and Balances is NOT when local judges can just tell Congress, "Nah. We don't think that applies to us"

Congress CAN NOT bypass the judicial. THAT is checks and balances.

So laws passed in a small town are binding EVERYWHERE?

 

[Silhouette]

^ Yes. Unbelievable, right?