Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
A few? Yes. However, O'Donnell, Miller, Buck and Angle lost seats that could have easily been won by less extreme candidates. Are you trying to say that a Democrat in the seat is better than a Republican who is not as conservative as you want them to be? If so, congratulations. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!
Bush's tax cuts aren't a problem except for Obama's new spending.
Bush's tax cuts aren't a problem except for Obama's new spending.
REALLY? How do you expect to pay down the debt if you cut taxes?
Bush's tax cuts aren't a problem except for Obama's new spending.
REALLY? How do you expect to pay down the debt if you cut taxes?
Nobody is cutting taxes. They are keeping taxes where they are.
Bush's tax cuts aren't a problem except for Obama's new spending.
REALLY? How do you expect to pay down the debt if you cut taxes?
Oh boy, another "TAXES HIGHER, DEBT LOWER" post.
Lord.
REALLY? How do you expect to pay down the debt if you cut taxes?
Nobody is cutting taxes. They are keeping taxes where they are.
OK, I can use your words. How do you plan to pay down the debt if you "keep tax levels where they are"?
Nobody is cutting taxes. They are keeping taxes where they are.
OK, I can use your words. How do you plan to pay down the debt if you "keep tax levels where they are"?
Keep spending commensurate with the current tax rates.
Clean up? Clean up how? You have tea party candidates advocating for violent revolution, preaching religious and ethnic bigotry, calling the President the "worst" in history, shilling for big business and the rich, playing "dress up" in Nazi uniforms, wanting to eviserate the United States Constitution, and preaching lockstep fealty to the notion that compromise is not an option.
I wish people were paying more attention. Perhaps when they are living in cardboard boxes..
Most Americans want to see spending addressed first and foremost... the notion that all spending except military is off the table is absurd. Entitlement spending has to be addressed along with the gazzillions wasted on the USDA, EPA, Dept. of Energy & Education, etc. Every year we're told we need to spend more, and every year the same idiots tell us it is worse.. then we need to spend more, then it is worse, then we need to spend more, then it is worse, then we need to spend more...... Bullshit.
Most Americans want to see spending addressed first and foremost... the notion that all spending except military is off the table is absurd. Entitlement spending has to be addressed along with the gazzillions wasted on the USDA, EPA, Dept. of Energy & Education, etc. Every year we're told we need to spend more, and every year the same idiots tell us it is worse.. then we need to spend more, then it is worse, then we need to spend more, then it is worse, then we need to spend more...... Bullshit.
I believe most people would be more than happy to see entitlement programs cut as long as "defense" spending is cut by the same proportion. Would you go for that?
Most Americans want to see spending addressed first and foremost... the notion that all spending except military is off the table is absurd. Entitlement spending has to be addressed along with the gazzillions wasted on the USDA, EPA, Dept. of Energy & Education, etc. Every year we're told we need to spend more, and every year the same idiots tell us it is worse.. then we need to spend more, then it is worse, then we need to spend more, then it is worse, then we need to spend more...... Bullshit.
I believe most people would be more than happy to see entitlement programs cut as long as "defense" spending is cut by the same proportion. Would you go for that?
Who are "most people?"
So, let's assume the new, new GOP wants to get the Bush tax cuts extended. How will they get it done. AND if they want the tax cuts so bad, where will they cut spending. And with gridlock, how will they cut spending?
I have posted numerous times about what agencies and programs should be cut or targeted by the GOP...
And even if it gets chopped out at the knees by the Senate or Obutthole... stick to their guns and put it all on the shoulders of the opposition as things get worse
While I appreciate your input, YOU are not a member of Congress (at least not that I am aware of), so what do your elected Republicans and Tea Partiers plan to cut? I mean they presented the "Contract to America" already, I am sure it is all spelled out in there, right?
REALLY? How do you expect to pay down the debt if you cut taxes?
Oh boy, another "TAXES HIGHER, DEBT LOWER" post.
Lord.
I'm trying to understand Eric Cantor's vision of lowering taxes while also lowering our national debt. Can you explain it?
Most Americans want to see spending addressed first and foremost... the notion that all spending except military is off the table is absurd. Entitlement spending has to be addressed along with the gazzillions wasted on the USDA, EPA, Dept. of Energy & Education, etc. Every year we're told we need to spend more, and every year the same idiots tell us it is worse.. then we need to spend more, then it is worse, then we need to spend more, then it is worse, then we need to spend more...... Bullshit.
I believe most people would be more than happy to see entitlement programs cut as long as "defense" spending is cut by the same proportion. Would you go for that?
Is the social spending paid for, but the military just debt?
Oh boy, another "TAXES HIGHER, DEBT LOWER" post.
Lord.
I'm trying to understand Eric Cantor's vision of lowering taxes while also lowering our national debt. Can you explain it?
Google it. There is a balance between taxes and spending, obviously as there is also a balance between taxes and growth. Merely taxing the shit out of people while spending like drunken sailors is not the answer. Again, Google it.
Most of us here understand that the debt has to be addressed. But, the notion that there are only two avenues, and that they are mutually exclusive, i.e., raising taxes or cutting spending, is bullshit. And BTW.. amidst a recession, taking more of people's money via taxation is not smart. Tax receipts are off not because the tax rates are too low, they are off because economic growth is too low.
Is the social spending paid for, but the military just debt?
At least the social spending is partially paid for with our taxes. The Bush wars were never budgeted for and taxes cannot and do not cover those costs.
