Fighting For Assad

[Flanders]

http://www.dailywire.com/sites/defa...17/03/gettyimages-632232790.jpg?itok=WqWnFcSi

In plain English, our military has no choice but to fight for Bashar Assad and against Obama-Kerry-Clinton foreign policy:

Trump Targets ISIS: US Marines Just Landed In Syria
By Joshua Yasmeh

Trump Targets ISIS: US Marines Just Landed In Syria​

A partnership with Putin is the only deal America can get in Syria. Question: How in hell did a deal with the Devil come about? Answer: The Arab Spring.

The Arab Spring was a disaster because it ignored the lesson Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini taught us: Never overthrow a friendly dictator:

The Shah [of Iran] was a friendly dictator. He came to power by booting out Communist Mohammad Mosaddegh in 1953. Half-a-brain Jimmy Carter replaced the Shah in 1979 with this guy:​

Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini​

https://tse2.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.M5a4ca64491e64613ed2415fb598e445fo1&pid=Api&w=136&h=181

Kerry Still Plugging Away In Syria

Hillary Clinton’s ugly hand in the Arab Spring is all but forgotten. That disaster gave birth to ISIS. Will anybody in the media point out that U.S. Marines are fighting for Assad —— who was a friendly dictator —— before John Kerry stuck his goddamned nose into Syria’s internal affairs? The fact is that Obama, Clinton, and Kerry, gave Assad more than he had before ISIS:

Russian President Vladimir Putin yesterday approved a law ratifying Moscow's deal with Syria to deploy its forces in the country indefinitely, in a move seen as firming their long-term presence.

The agreement -- signed between Moscow and Damascus in August 2015 -- allowed Russia to establish its Hmeimim airbase to launch operations in support of ally President Bashar al-Assad's forces.​

12:00 AM, October 15, 2016 / LAST MODIFIED: 02:24 AM, October 15, 2016
Russia to stay in Syria

Russia to stay in Syria | The Daily Star​

Finally, Americans are better off with friendly dictators than they are with democracy. The only thing worse than democracy is democracy-building.

 

[Bleipriester]

US Boots on the ground in Syria

 

[Flanders]

US Boots on the ground in Syria

To Bleipriester: I see from your thread you are still pushing the United Nations and non-existent international law.

All the US involvement is not approved by the Syrian government and the UN.

XXXXX​

No, the Coalition has no mandate and no allowance. Totally illegally according to international law.​

 

[Fenton Lum]

The Shah came into power because the US took out a duly democratically elected ruler of another sovereign nation to further the interests of US corporate economic colonialism. Economic colonialism is also why america must constantly be at war.

 

[Bleipriester]

US Boots on the ground in Syria

To Bleipriester: I see from your thread you are still pushing the United Nations and non-existent international law.

All the US involvement is not approved by the Syrian government and the UN.

XXXXX​

No, the Coalition has no mandate and no allowance. Totally illegally according to international law.​

And what´s your point?

 

[irosie91]

The Shah came into power because the US took out a duly democratically elected ruler of another sovereign nation to further the interests of US corporate economic colonialism. Economic colonialism is also why america must constantly be at war.

wrong again------Iranians put the Shah in power-------the US military was not involved--------must you lie?

 

[Flanders]

The Shah came into power because the US took out a duly democratically elected ruler of another sovereign nation to further the interests of US corporate economic colonialism. Economic colonialism is also why america must constantly be at war.

To Fenton Lum: Guys like you are either stupid, or you want America defeated, or really do not know the difference between friendly dictators and the unfriendly kind. Mohammad Mosaddegh was a Communist; hence, he was an enemy on the Soviet Union’s side in the Cold War.

For as long as I can remember, liberals screamed about foreign aid going to support dictators, while they advocated support for every kind for Communist dictatorship. Vietnam, North Korea, Communist China, the defunct Soviet Union, and Cuba exporting Communism throughout Latin America provide the best known examples of what the Left supports. The Shah of Iran, and the Iran-Contra Affair, show the results of the Left’s true agenda?​

Illegal Immigration Moves Into The Top Spot

And what´s your point?

To Bleipriester: Anything America & Allies do against the United Nations and international law is good for sovereignty regardless of how it first appears. I would die a happy man if just once a US President would tell that scum at the United Nations to shove International law up the furthest part of their collective asses.

The Shah came into power because the US took out a duly democratically elected ruler of another sovereign nation to further the interests of US corporate economic colonialism. Economic colonialism is also why america must constantly be at war.

wrong again------Iranians put the Shah in power-------the US military was not involved--------must you lie?

To irosie91: Thank you. Allow me to elaborate with excerpts from this article:

Misconception #1: The United States wanted Iran’s oil

The United States had no oil interests in Iran (it was the British that did). The primary goal of the Americans was to prevent the spread of Communism, and to secondary was to resolve the dispute as quickly as possible (see National Security Council document NSC 136/1).

XXXXX​

Misconception #2: Mohammad Mossadegh was a democratically elected Prime Minister

XXXXX​

Misconception #3: The Eisenhower Administration was determined to remove Mossadegh from power from Day 1

One of the fundamental misunderstandings concerns the Eisenhower Administration’s decision to remove Mossadegh from power. A cursory reading of the documents supplied in the FRUS volume concerning Iran, reveals that the President was most concerned with the specter of Communism above anything else.

XXXXX​

Misconception #4: The CIA coup was successful

It is clear from the record that the attempted coup (code-named TPAJAX) which was undertaken on the night of August 15th, 1953, was a dismal failure. Not only did the Iranian military officers fail in their task to arrest Mossadegh, the CIA did not have a backup plan.

XXXXX​

Misconception #5: CIA documents corroborate each other

There is an recurrent idea that the CIA is all-powerful, and that classified documents from the CIA are inherently truthful and accurate.

XXXXX​

Misconception #6: Westerners and Royalists were the only ones who wished to remove Mossadegh from power

This is perhaps the biggest misunderstanding of all. While Mossadegh had enjoyed great popularity earlier in his term, his coalition had come under great pressure, and former allies had begun to oppose him.​

Six Myths about the Coup against Iran's Mossadegh
Morgan Carlston
September 2, 2014

Six Myths about the Coup against Iran's Mossadegh​

 

[Bleipriester]

To Bleipriester: Anything America & Allies do against the United Nations and international law is good for sovereignty regardless of how it first appears. I would die a happy man if just once a US President would tell that scum at the United Nations to shove International law up the furthest part of their collective asses.

Good for whose sovereignty? If Americans do not play by the rules that they impose on others, how can we take their politics serious? What are their words worth? Not a rat´s ass. It´s good to have a capable military, instead.

 

[Flanders]

Hillary Clinton’s ugly hand in the Arab Spring is all but forgotten.

Had Hillary Clinton won the election the Muslim Brotherhood Stooge would be Secretary of Defense instead of General Mattis:

Patterson with Muhammad Badie—supreme leader of the Muslim Brotherhood—currently serving a life sentence in prison for terrorism related charges in Egypt.​

https://tse3.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIF.drw+AbkMCT6jql55AqhIkg&pid=Api&w=303&h=181

This is putting it mildly. Back during the months leading to the June 30, 2013 revolution, Patterson—the “Brotherhood’s Stooge” as she was called by all, from news analysts to the Egyptian street—was arguably one of the most hated individuals by the millions of Egyptians who took to the streets against Morsi and the Brotherhood.

Not only did her face regularly appear next to Obama’s in placards; it sometimes appeared alone, indicating just how closely she was seen as supporting the Brotherhood. It should be noted that these were not isolated sightings, as shown by the number of different placards and signs:​

Why Is General Mattis Nominating the’Muslim Brotherhood’s Stooge’?
By Raymond Ibrahim
March 12, 2017

Why Is General Mattis Nominating the’Muslim Brotherhood’s Stooge’?​

And let us not forget the influence Huma Abedin would have wielded in a Clinton Administration:

. . . Huma Abedin’s mother, Saleha, who is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood’s female division (the “Muslim Sisterhood”), is a major figure in not one but two Union for Good components. The first is the International Islamic Council for Dawa and Relief (IICDR). It is banned in Israel for supporting Hamas under the auspices of the Union for Good. Then there’s the International Islamic Committee for Woman and Child (IICWC) — an organization that Dr. Saleha Abedin has long headed. Dr. Abedin’s IICWC describes itself as part of the IICDR. And wouldn’t you know it, the IICWC charter was written by none other than . . . Sheikh Qaradawi, in conjunction with several self-proclaimed members of the Muslim Brotherhood.​

Huma Abedin’s Muslim Brotherhood Ties
by Andrew C. McCarthy July 25, 2012 4:00 AM

Huma Abedin’s Muslim Brotherhood Ties, by Andrew C. McCarthy, National Review​

XXXXX​

He describes Hillary Clinton as a ‘domestic threat” and details the deep connections between the former Democratic presidential nominee and secretary of state with some of the most dangerous Islamic movements in the world. They even go beyond her close relationship with longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin.​

XXXXX​

“Hillary Clinton’s ties are a lot deeper, broader and wider than Huma Abedin,” Haney says. “The best example of her ties is her affiliation with the Istanbul Process and, in particular, with U.N. Resolution 1618. That resolution, it essentially criminalizes defamation of Islam, has been backed for 10 years by the Organization of the Islamic Conference, a 57-nation organization. It is essentially run in its leadership positions by members of the Muslim Brotherhood. By endorsing U.N. Resolution 16/18, by default Hillary Clinton is aiding and abetting the Muslim Brotherhood on a macro, global level.”​

'Enemies Within' – Hillary's links to Muslim Brotherhood revealed
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 01/05/2017 @ 9:02 pm

‘Enemies Within’ – Hillary’s links to Muslim Brotherhood revealed​

 

[montelatici]

The Shah came into power because the US took out a duly democratically elected ruler of another sovereign nation to further the interests of US corporate economic colonialism. Economic colonialism is also why america must constantly be at war.

wrong again------Iranians put the Shah in power-------the US military was not involved--------must you lie?

As usual, Rosie the bullshitter strikes again. Are you really that unfamiliar with historical fact?

"CIA admits role in 1953 Iranian coup
Declassified documents describe in detail how US – with British help – engineered coup against Mohammad Mosaddeq

"The military coup that overthrew Mosaddeq and his National Front cabinet was carried out under CIA direction as an act of US foreign policy, conceived and approved at the highest levels of government," reads a previously excised section of an internal CIA history titled The Battle for Iran.

The documents, published on the archive's website under freedom of information laws, describe in detail how the US – with British help – engineered the coup, codenamed TPAJAX by the CIA and Operation Boot by Britain's MI6.

Britain, and in particular Sir Anthony Eden, the foreign secretary, regarded Mosaddeq as a serious threat to its strategic and economic interests after the Iranian leader nationalised the British Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, latterly known as BP. But the UK needed US support. The Eisenhower administration in Washington was easily persuaded.

British documents show how senior officials in the 1970s tried to stop Washington from releasing documents that would be "very embarrassing" to the UK."

CIA admits role in 1953 Iranian coup

 

[irosie91]

The Shah came into power because the US took out a duly democratically elected ruler of another sovereign nation to further the interests of US corporate economic colonialism. Economic colonialism is also why america must constantly be at war.

wrong again------Iranians put the Shah in power-------the US military was not involved--------must you lie?

As usual, Rosie the bullshitter strikes again. Are you really that unfamiliar with historical fact?

"CIA admits role in 1953 Iranian coup
Declassified documents describe in detail how US – with British help – engineered coup against Mohammad Mosaddeq

"The military coup that overthrew Mosaddeq and his National Front cabinet was carried out under CIA direction as an act of US foreign policy, conceived and approved at the highest levels of government," reads a previously excised section of an internal CIA history titled The Battle for Iran.

The documents, published on the archive's website under freedom of information laws, describe in detail how the US – with British help – engineered the coup, codenamed TPAJAX by the CIA and Operation Boot by Britain's MI6.

Britain, and in particular Sir Anthony Eden, the foreign secretary, regarded Mosaddeq as a serious threat to its strategic and economic interests after the Iranian leader nationalised the British Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, latterly known as BP. But the UK needed US support. The Eisenhower administration in Washington was easily persuaded.

British documents show how senior officials in the 1970s tried to stop Washington from releasing documents that would be "very embarrassing" to the UK."

CIA admits role in 1953 Iranian coup

the pile of dog shit, montelatici----farts again. The pile is desperate to promote the Baathist lie that the CAPITALIST USA INVADED IRAN AND FORCED THE SHAH ONTO THE PEACOCK THRONE against the will of DA PEEPLE who LONGED for a socialist------anti capitalist government to the delight of the USSR.
Now all is well for the DELIGHTED BAATHIST STYLE SHIITES WHO SEEK
PEACE AND LOVE FOR ALL THE WORLD and presently ENJOY the prosperity
of being an OIL PRODUCING COUNTRY-----like Kuwait

 

[Fenton Lum]

The Shah came into power because the US took out a duly democratically elected ruler of another sovereign nation to further the interests of US corporate economic colonialism. Economic colonialism is also why america must constantly be at war.

wrong again------Iranians put the Shah in power-------the US military was not involved--------must you lie?

As usual, Rosie the bullshitter strikes again. Are you really that unfamiliar with historical fact?

"CIA admits role in 1953 Iranian coup
Declassified documents describe in detail how US – with British help – engineered coup against Mohammad Mosaddeq

"The military coup that overthrew Mosaddeq and his National Front cabinet was carried out under CIA direction as an act of US foreign policy, conceived and approved at the highest levels of government," reads a previously excised section of an internal CIA history titled The Battle for Iran.

The documents, published on the archive's website under freedom of information laws, describe in detail how the US – with British help – engineered the coup, codenamed TPAJAX by the CIA and Operation Boot by Britain's MI6.

Britain, and in particular Sir Anthony Eden, the foreign secretary, regarded Mosaddeq as a serious threat to its strategic and economic interests after the Iranian leader nationalised the British Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, latterly known as BP. But the UK needed US support. The Eisenhower administration in Washington was easily persuaded.

British documents show how senior officials in the 1970s tried to stop Washington from releasing documents that would be "very embarrassing" to the UK."

CIA admits role in 1953 Iranian coup

the pile of dog shit, montelatici----farts again. The pile is desperate to promote the Baathist lie that the CAPITALIST USA INVADED IRAN AND FORCED THE SHAH ONTO THE PEACOCK THRONE against the will of DA PEEPLE who LONGED for a socialist------anti capitalist government to the delight of the USSR.
Now all is well for the DELIGHTED BAATHIST STYLE SHIITES WHO SEEK
PEACE AND LOVE FOR ALL THE WORLD and presently ENJOY the prosperity
of being an OIL PRODUCING COUNTRY-----like Kuwait

The history is what is it darlin', sorry.

 

[irosie91]

The Shah came into power because the US took out a duly democratically elected ruler of another sovereign nation to further the interests of US corporate economic colonialism. Economic colonialism is also why america must constantly be at war.

wrong again------Iranians put the Shah in power-------the US military was not involved--------must you lie?

As usual, Rosie the bullshitter strikes again. Are you really that unfamiliar with historical fact?

"CIA admits role in 1953 Iranian coup
Declassified documents describe in detail how US – with British help – engineered coup against Mohammad Mosaddeq

"The military coup that overthrew Mosaddeq and his National Front cabinet was carried out under CIA direction as an act of US foreign policy, conceived and approved at the highest levels of government," reads a previously excised section of an internal CIA history titled The Battle for Iran.

The documents, published on the archive's website under freedom of information laws, describe in detail how the US – with British help – engineered the coup, codenamed TPAJAX by the CIA and Operation Boot by Britain's MI6.

Britain, and in particular Sir Anthony Eden, the foreign secretary, regarded Mosaddeq as a serious threat to its strategic and economic interests after the Iranian leader nationalised the British Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, latterly known as BP. But the UK needed US support. The Eisenhower administration in Washington was easily persuaded.

British documents show how senior officials in the 1970s tried to stop Washington from releasing documents that would be "very embarrassing" to the UK."

CIA admits role in 1953 Iranian coup

the pile of dog shit, montelatici----farts again. The pile is desperate to promote the Baathist lie that the CAPITALIST USA INVADED IRAN AND FORCED THE SHAH ONTO THE PEACOCK THRONE against the will of DA PEEPLE who LONGED for a socialist------anti capitalist government to the delight of the USSR.
Now all is well for the DELIGHTED BAATHIST STYLE SHIITES WHO SEEK
PEACE AND LOVE FOR ALL THE WORLD and presently ENJOY the prosperity
of being an OIL PRODUCING COUNTRY-----like Kuwait

The history is what is it darlin', sorry.

yes----the history is what it is-----Iranians who supported the shah----put him
in power------The USA did not do it and Great Britain did not do it------both--simply APPLAUDED just as Iranians and you applauded when the twin towers came tumbling down

 

[Flanders]

Had Hillary Clinton won the election the Muslim Brotherhood Stooge would be Secretary of Defense instead of General Mattis:

I will wager that media will not give this one wall-to-wall coverage:

General Mattis Withdrew Nominee for Top Pentagon Civilian Job for Muslim Brotherhood Ties
By Jenni Fink
3 hours ago

General Mattis Withdrew Nominee for Top Pentagon Civilian Job for Muslim Brotherhood Ties​

 

[montelatici]

The Shah came into power because the US took out a duly democratically elected ruler of another sovereign nation to further the interests of US corporate economic colonialism. Economic colonialism is also why america must constantly be at war.

wrong again------Iranians put the Shah in power-------the US military was not involved--------must you lie?

As usual, Rosie the bullshitter strikes again. Are you really that unfamiliar with historical fact?

"CIA admits role in 1953 Iranian coup
Declassified documents describe in detail how US – with British help – engineered coup against Mohammad Mosaddeq

"The military coup that overthrew Mosaddeq and his National Front cabinet was carried out under CIA direction as an act of US foreign policy, conceived and approved at the highest levels of government," reads a previously excised section of an internal CIA history titled The Battle for Iran.

The documents, published on the archive's website under freedom of information laws, describe in detail how the US – with British help – engineered the coup, codenamed TPAJAX by the CIA and Operation Boot by Britain's MI6.

Britain, and in particular Sir Anthony Eden, the foreign secretary, regarded Mosaddeq as a serious threat to its strategic and economic interests after the Iranian leader nationalised the British Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, latterly known as BP. But the UK needed US support. The Eisenhower administration in Washington was easily persuaded.

British documents show how senior officials in the 1970s tried to stop Washington from releasing documents that would be "very embarrassing" to the UK."

CIA admits role in 1953 Iranian coup

the pile of dog shit, montelatici----farts again. The pile is desperate to promote the Baathist lie that the CAPITALIST USA INVADED IRAN AND FORCED THE SHAH ONTO THE PEACOCK THRONE against the will of DA PEEPLE who LONGED for a socialist------anti capitalist government to the delight of the USSR.
Now all is well for the DELIGHTED BAATHIST STYLE SHIITES WHO SEEK
PEACE AND LOVE FOR ALL THE WORLD and presently ENJOY the prosperity
of being an OIL PRODUCING COUNTRY-----like Kuwait

The history is what is it darlin', sorry.

yes----the history is what it is-----Iranians who supported the shah----put him
in power------The USA did not do it and Great Britain did not do it------both--simply APPLAUDED just as Iranians and you applauded when the twin towers came tumbling down

Rosie, you are our best asset. A dummy.

 

[irosie91]

for those who do not know-------Monte parrots the communist Russia partyline NO MATTER WHAT

 

[montelatici]

for those who do not know-------Monte parrots the communist Russia partyline NO MATTER WHAT

You are confusing me with Trump.

 

[irosie91]

for those who do not know-------Monte parrots the communist Russia partyline NO MATTER WHAT

You are confusing me with Trump.

Trump is a OOMMUNIST ??? does Bernie Sanders know? does Ivanka?----
think again, O' thou favored of mass murdering Baathist dogs--SADDAM AND ASSAD

 

[Flanders]

https://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/payn_c14973420170331120100.jpg

Hillary Clinton is trying to clean up her Arab Spring for another run in 2020. It will not wash. ISIS was Hillary’s gift to Syria:

Hillary Clinton called for the US to toughen up its response to Assad's atrocities just hours before Trump launched strikes on Syria
By Thomas Burrows for MailOnline
Published: 08:20 EDT, 7 April 2017 | Updated: 10:11 EDT, 7 April 2017

Hillary Clinton called for the US air strike hours earlier | Daily Mail Online​

Traitor John Kerry followed Clinton and made Syria worse:

Google

Secretary of State Tillison is going down the same garden path mapped out by Clinton and Kerry:

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said Thursday that “steps are underway” on an international coalition to pressure Bashar Assad from power, as President Trump was being briefed on military options for Syria – though what specific steps the U.S. and its allies might take in response to the latest deadly chemical weapons attack remained unclear.​

Tillerson says coalition forming to target Assad, Trump hearing military options
Published April 06, 2017

Tillerson says coalition forming to target Assad, Trump hearing military options​

NOTE: A United Nations INTERNATIONAL COALITION in the Gulf War stopped Bush the Elder from going all the way to Bagdad. Had Bush toppled Saddam Hussein in 1990 there would have been no need to invade Iraq after 9-11-2001. That is fact not Monday morning quarter backing.

I tried to find out if the United Nations will be in charge of Tillison’s international coalition for Syria. The only thing I learned is that it is the best kept secret in the media.

My bet is on the US military being ordered to engage in a little democracy-building for the United Nations.

Finally, it not take long for Trump to go swimming in the swamp he once promised to drain. Obama and Hillary toppling Gaddafi taught Trump nothing:

Americans are better off with friendly dictators than they are with democracy. The only thing worse than democracy is democracy-building.

 

[Flanders]

Huma Abedin’s Muslim Brotherhood Ties

Nailing Huma for espionage and/or treason is off the table because the net would pull in Hillary Clinton. Settling for larceny will have to suffice:

Moreover, Kit Digital appears in State Department emails sent to Abedin from Amanat and a business partner. In June 2009, not long after starting Kit Digital and just months after his cousin was named deputy chief of staff to Secretary of State Clinton, Amanat helped his business partner solicit Abedin for State favors on behalf of Soliya Inc., which was in partnership with Kit Digital. Summit Entertainment, a film company Amanat held a controlling stake in at the time, also stood to benefit.

Huma’s indicted first cousin Omar Amanat

“Thanks for getting in touch. Would love to arrange a meeting,” Abedin replied in a June 23, 2009, email to Amanat and Shamil Idriss, who heads New York-based Soliya Inc.

In May 2010, Clinton helped Soliya get access to U.N. funding by making the U.S. a participant in a U.N. high-tech media initiative called the Alliance of Civilizations. Then in October 2010, the State Department directly awarded Soliya $1.25 million for a media technology project.

“Huma helped Omar make KIT appear more valuable because of its association with the Alliance of Civilizations, which was approved by Hillary and funded in part by U.S. grants,” said an attorney familiar with the case. “This helped Omar raise money for KIT, which he and his brother misappropriated for other purposes. Approximately $6 million has vanished.”​

Huma Abedin's family under federal investigation
Posted By Paul Sperry On 04/26/2017 @ 8:55 pm

Huma Abedin’s family under federal investigation​