Derideo_Te
Je Suis Charlie
- Mar 2, 2013
- 20,461
- 7,961
- 360
Goes to motive! Brown would never have tried to "grab the gun" if it had remained holstered because he wouldn't have been able to see it, let alone reach it. Therefore Wilson had to have drawn his own gun and the legitimate question is why did he draw his gun on an unarmed person walking down the street in broad daylight? That is not police SOP.
That is the dumbest response I've seen yet.
Brown would not have been able to see it? Or reach it?
Columbus Ohio Police.
Ok sparky.... can you tell where the gun is? You think you could reach it?
Dumb stuff on the forum today. Just plain stupid.
Why don't you explain where your gun is going to be when your ass is in the drivers seat of the police cruiser?
Then explain how someone standing outside of the vehicle is going to be able to reach through the window, across your body, slide their hand down between your hip and the seat and then twist the holster and remove the gun. Furthermore if it is a level II or level III holster how are they even going to get it out of the holster? And what will you be doing in the meantime? Eating your donut and drinking your coffee? Or using your own hands and arms to block them?
Obviously you haven't thought this through!
Idiots do idiotic things
Case in point, stealing cigars from a store.
Have you thought this through or just continuing to justify a lost debate?
Let me ask C_K to open a Lost & Found forum for you so you will know where to go in future.
You've run out of thoughts that can be blown out of the water?
Ahhhhh, how cute
How ironic coming from someone who imaged that "idiots do idiotic things" was a profound contribution to this thread!