Feds want Gun Control? Tucson shooter cops plea

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by whitehall, Aug 7, 2012.

  1. whitehall
    Online

    whitehall Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    30,683
    Thanks Received:
    5,005
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Western Va.
    Ratings:
    +14,318
    What in the world were they thinking when they let The Tucson shooter, Jared Loughner, who killed six people in an attempt to murder Rep. Giffords plead guilty to a lesser charge and dodge the death penalty? Didn't Holder's justice dept think they had a good case when the captured the perp literally with a smoking gun in his hand? Why does the Obama administration whine about magazine capacity and assault weapons when they should be seeking the death penalty in this case?
     
  2. theDoctorisIn
    Offline

    theDoctorisIn Senior Mod Staff Member Senior USMB Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2009
    Messages:
    31,712
    Thanks Received:
    6,174
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    East, but still West
    Ratings:
    +13,429
    So, you think it's a good idea to waste millions of taxpayer dollars with many trials and appeals, just to satisfy your bloodlust?
     
  3. whitehall
    Online

    whitehall Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    30,683
    Thanks Received:
    5,005
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Western Va.
    Ratings:
    +14,318
    Granted the Holder "justice dept" doesn't look too competent but how many trials do you think it would take to convict a shooter who was captured with the freaking smoking gun in his hand? Am I missing something about this guy? Is he related to Bill Ayers or a contributor to Huffington? This is a high profile case. Shouldn't we send a message to future political assassins that we are willing to spend a couple of bucks to try to convict this guy and put him on the gurney with a needle in his arm?
     
  4. Cecilie1200
    Offline

    Cecilie1200 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2008
    Messages:
    27,884
    Thanks Received:
    3,891
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +7,779
    He's crazy. Insanity plea trials are something of a crap shoot, and in this case, prosecutors can't deny outright that he's mentally ill, so they'd have to go with "technically crazy, but not legally crazy", which is rather a fine distinction to try to make with juries.
     
  5. Publius1787
    Offline

    Publius1787 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Messages:
    6,211
    Thanks Received:
    668
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,401
    Justice shoud be blind, and to a certain extent, unaware of her checking account status.
     

Share This Page