bullwinkle
Gold Member
- Mar 4, 2013
- 5,446
- 761
- 245
It's the law!Hawk, I guess Hatch should have checked with you before he proposed the act, right? Are you saying that if a law doesn't make sense to you, you are free to ignore it? This is one of those times when I have to quote the old cliche so famous among Republicans that 'the law is the law. If you don't like it change it. Meantime...' The Trump-appointed head of OSC is adamant that the law is broken. And this admin is really good at claiming they didn't know it is wrong while piously turning eyes heavenward.The President’s staff can speak out against political opponents all they want, whether they are Dem or Republicans.No, speaking out against terrorists is not "political activity" Speaking out against political opponents during elections is.
Not when they are paid by the taxpayers. If she wants to engage in partisan politics then put her on the RNC payroll.
So it’s perfectly fine for Congress critters to engage in partisan politics while being paid by taxpayers, but not a Republican in the executive branch.
Yea, that makes a lot of sense.
The Hatch Act is quite ridiculous if you read it. It’s very vague, using ambiguous terms for a law is always a bad idea. If challenged it will probably be tossed out by the SCOTUS.