FEC chair rebukes Trump over statements on accepting election help from foreign governments

by the third week of March 2019, Kushner had the president's full attention. "they can not only impeach you, they can bankrupt you and lock you up for life". Agitated and angry, Trump pressed John Dowd & Don McGahn for reassurances
 
Kushner told Trump that the Southern District of NY is going after Trump as though he was a drug lord or Mob don. under RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations), which Giliuani championed when he was head of the District!

the government could potentially seize Trump Tower, Kushner told President Trump
So you approve of The Government being Worse than The Mob?

Figures you loved that Nazi Shit.

Maybe you need a bath you Dirty DemNazi
mexican-word-of-the-day-bodywash-iwanted-to-go-away-27481261.png
 
Trump has restored showmanship to American politics. no one can do it like him. he has taken the wonks like Paul Ryan out of politics! in sum, he knows his audience.
 
Trump has restored showmanship to American politics. no one can do it like him. he has taken the wonks like Paul Ryan out of politics! in sum, he knows his audience.
And don’t forget lawlessness. He’s also restored lawlessness to the office of president.
 
It's "ONSTRUCTION [OBSTRUCTION] OF JUSTICE". Not obstruction of crime. Obstruction of crime is what investigators do.

If there is no crime, what is being obstructed? If there is no underlying crime, how can anything be obstructed? Who was prevented from testifying?
To obstruct an ongoing investigation is OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. If that investigation reveals no crime, it must be able to conduct itself free of ONSTRUCTION.

Let's hear from McGahn. He is being kept from testifying.
So wait, you are Constipated, because you ate too much Donkey Dong, but then you have a bowel movement and go back for more Donkey Dong?

To execute Justice you have to have made an infraction against Justice that needs to be investigated. You cannot obstruct Justice if you are merely defending your reputation and have committed no crimes.

The only crime here is your love of Donkey Dong. Do they serve that with any kind of sauce?

It's a delicacy in LibPhuckistan I hear, but I never been there.

iu
No crimes?

Sit across from Manafort and Cohen at an aluminum picnic table on visiting day. Tell them there were no crimes.

LOL Dope. Anything Manafort did was in conjuction with Joe Biden's Bribes in The Ukraine while working for Obama & Clinton employed by The Podesta Group.

Here, have a Taco. You'll feel better.

Maybe you should sit in a wheelchair. You are kinda looking week.


funny-mexican-memes-1.jpg


GOTTA BE THE REASON BIDEN WAS BEING INVESTIGATED !!
 
D8_awYNXYAAoANu

D8_awYNX4AArzC9


One good thing is that Republicans can no longer complain they are the party of line order, Now the party of treason and crime.
Many of us knew that already for years. We saw it under Reagan and under bush. And now we’re seeing it in spades under Trump.
 
I will say this, intentionally or unintentionally, Trump sure knows how to keep the crap stirred up.
 
D8_awYNXYAAoANu

D8_awYNX4AArzC9


One good thing is that Republicans can no longer complain they are the party of line order, Now the party of treason and crime.
Many of us knew that already for years. We saw it under Reagan and under bush. And now we’re seeing it in spades under Trump.

No kidding, evidently Hillary didn't know...dumbass.
 
D8_awYNXYAAoANu

D8_awYNX4AArzC9


One good thing is that Republicans can no longer complain they are the party of line order, Now the party of treason and crime.
Many of us knew that already for years. We saw it under Reagan and under bush. And now we’re seeing it in spades under Trump.

the law of averages will bite them all in the ass before its over- they get a little braver by the day, then one day they wake up in a cell.
 
Bannon understood what moved Trump. Facts did not. but a sense that he might lose a thing valuable to him moved him on his hind legs. if you confronted him with losing, he would turn on a dime. it was his only play. he needs to win the second. or he drifts
 
To obstruct an ongoing investigation is OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. If that investigation reveals no crime, it must be able to conduct itself free of ONSTRUCTION.

Let's hear from McGahn. He is being kept from testifying.

There was no crime, how could anyone prove there was obstruction and why?
 
Bannon understood what moved Trump. Facts did not. but a sense that he might lose a thing valuable to him moved him on his hind legs. if you confronted him with losing, he would turn on a dime. it was his only play. he needs to win the second. or he drifts
I think Bannon led Trump into bad water. The Wall was an improvised Bannon line. Trump never had 50 gop senate votes for it. But he was tied to it. And I'll never understand why. He could easily have had 100% increase in deportion courts and law enforcement, beefed up e-verify, and vigorous deportations of those illegally here for a long time. Serious regulation of temporary agricultural workers. It could have been a Big League change in immigration enforcement. It would have moved his polls, and I don't think his faithful would abandon him for sincere efforts.

But he was tied to rapists and murderers and a Judge with a Hispanic surname that Trump felt made him biased against him.

And even so, it may be that Trump can match W, or at least come close, with Hispanic votes. Trump got 28% and W's high water mark was 40%. Anyone who says Hispanics are for illegal immigration has not been paying attention.
 
To obstruct an ongoing investigation is OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. If that investigation reveals no crime, it must be able to conduct itself free of ONSTRUCTION.

Let's hear from McGahn. He is being kept from testifying.

There was no crime, how could anyone prove there was obstruction and why?
I don't think Trump should be impeached for obstruction, but do you keep asking the same question because you don't understand the legal answer or because you don't like it?
 
To obstruct an ongoing investigation is OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. If that investigation reveals no crime, it must be able to conduct itself free of ONSTRUCTION.

Let's hear from McGahn. He is being kept from testifying.

There was no crime, how could anyone prove there was obstruction and why?
Trump asked McGahn to put a letter in the file that was a lie. He asked Lewendowski to ask Sessions to fire Mueller. Am doing eight other examples of obstruction.

READ THE MUELLER REPORT FOR YOURSELF! There's stuff in there neither Rush nor Fox will tell you.
 
Let's cut the crap. Trump cannot accept help from a foreign governments to get him elected.

FEC chair rebukes Trump over statements on accepting election help from foreign governments

The head of the Federal Elections Commission issued a thinly veiled rebuke of Donald Trump on Thursday over the president’s stance on accepting opposition research from foreign governments on his political adversaries.

Ellen Weintraub, the FEC chair, expressed her disbelief that Trump believed accepting foreign assistance in a U.S. political election was permissible.

FEC chair rebukes Trump over statements on accepting election help from foreign governments


Did the FEC chair rebuke hilary when she got campaign help from the Ukraine, Britain, and Russia? And considering that obama and his people at the Department of Justice and the CIA used hilary's information from Russia and the Ukraine to get illegal FISA warrants.....was the FEC chair mad about that?
 
To obstruct an ongoing investigation is OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. If that investigation reveals no crime, it must be able to conduct itself free of ONSTRUCTION.

Let's hear from McGahn. He is being kept from testifying.

There was no crime, how could anyone prove there was obstruction and why?
I don't think Trump should be impeached for obstruction, but do you keep asking the same question because you don't understand the legal answer or because you don't like it?
Does obstruction of justice reach the threshold of high crimes and misdemeanors? The very first article of impeachment against Nixon was obstruction.

Often said: it wasn't the crime but the coverup.
 
‘Uh-Oh, We Shouldn’t Have This’

In 2000, life did work that way for Tom Downey, a former Democratic representative from New York who was helping his friend, Vice President Al Gore, run for the White House. Downey, who had served in the House for 18 years until becoming a lobbyist in 1993, had been preparing to play Gore’s opponent, George W. Bush, in the presidential debates when, in mid-September, he received a package in the mail. It contained briefing materials and a videotape. When Downey started watching the tape, along with his assistant, he quickly realized it was a video of Bush practicing as if he were being interviewed by Tim Russert, the late Meet the Press host who was a contender to moderate the first debate.
 
Let's cut the crap. Trump cannot accept help from a foreign governments to get him elected.

FEC chair rebukes Trump over statements on accepting election help from foreign governments

The head of the Federal Elections Commission issued a thinly veiled rebuke of Donald Trump on Thursday over the president’s stance on accepting opposition research from foreign governments on his political adversaries.

Ellen Weintraub, the FEC chair, expressed her disbelief that Trump believed accepting foreign assistance in a U.S. political election was permissible.

FEC chair rebukes Trump over statements on accepting election help from foreign governments

Yep, she made it crystal clear!

D8-jw8WW4AErKk7.png


FEC CHAIR BLISTERS TRUMP: *THAT’S ILLEGAL*


Did they send this letter to hilary when she was getting help from Ukraine and Russia....when they were giving information to hilary for the Steele Dossier which was actually used to get illegal FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign?
 
Obama and Clinton Paid $14 Million for The Dirty Dossier.

Jail Time or Hanging Time for Treason?

I think you are going through ISIS Cock Sucking Withdrawal Syndrome.

String Them Up!

String Them Up!

String Them Up!



D8_awYNXYAAoANu

D8_awYNX4AArzC9


One good thing is that Republicans can no longer complain they are the party of line order, Now the party of treason and crime.
Many of us knew that already for years. We saw it under Reagan and under bush. And now we’re seeing it in spades under Trump.
 

Forum List

Back
Top