Discussion in 'History' started by rightwinger, Jan 9, 2016.
Brave, loyal, innocent Americans didn’t need to be thrown into concentration camps “to save the country.”
Kept them from becoming terrorists and sabatoers
There were no further attacks after Pearl Harbor
By the same un-American illogic, we had better throw your ass in jail to make sure you don’t commit any crime.
Had there been sabotage and other crimes committed against the defense industries. and FDR had not taken any defensible measures, you guys would now be pralsing FDR as a great president for his hands-off policy, right? Get real.
Illogical, unlawful, un-American. Your idol was the worst scumbag to ever sully the office, and your clumsy attempts at playing the apologist are shameful.
So why do America's most noted historians keep voting for FDR as one of America's top three presidents? Do you not believe the historians or you simply write your own history-as many conservatives on these boards do?
Historians are liberal
Follow the money, you dunce.
Abiding by the dictates of the Liberals who run academia, they put bread on the table.
The proof is that FDR boot-lickers, you, can never refute the charges brought against him in these threads.
Same old logical fallacy again and again. You still haven’t learned how to think.
Separate names with a comma.