FDA: We don't need no stinkin Constitution

chanel

Silver Member
Jun 8, 2009
12,098
3,202
98
People's Republic of NJ
Very interesting article on raw milk (which I could care less about), but scary comments from the food police worth reading.

Raw milk battle reveals FDA abandonment of basic human right to choose your food

In a dismissal notice issued to the Iowa District Court where the suit was filed, the FDA officially made public its views on health and food freedom. These views will shock you, but they reveal the true evil intent of the FDA and why it is truly a rogue federal agency.

The FDA essentially believes that nobody has the right to choose what to eat or drink. You are only “allowed” to eat or drink what the FDA gives you permission to. There is no inherent right or God-given right to consume any foods from nature without the FDA’s consent.

This is no exaggeration. It’s exactly what the FDA said in its own words.

“There is no ‘deeply rooted’ historical tradition of unfettered access to foods of all kinds.” [p. 26]

“Plaintiffs’ assertion of a ‘fundamental right to their own bodily and physical health, which includes what foods they do and do not choose to consume for themselves and their families’ is similarly unavailing because plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to obtain any food they wish.” [p.26]


But it gets even worse. On page 27 of the dismissal, the FDA also states that Americans do not have a fundamental right to enter into private contractual agreements with one another, either.

The FDA vs Raw Milk and the Constitution|Tenth Amendment Center

BTW - the raw milk controversy has nothing to do with health. (just in case someone wants to bring up poisons and - gasp - fat kids.)
 

Forum List

Back
Top