FBI Lawyer Squeals Like a Pig: Implicates Comey, McCabe, and Yates for Mishandling of FISA Warrant

Do you guys actually understand what it takes to get a FISA warrant?

If what you guys think is actually true, there are federal judges who broke the law.

But it probably is not. Why?

The Gateway Pundit


extremeright03.png


QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis.

History

The Gateway Pundit is an extreme right news and opinion website that is not afraid of conspiracy theories and the occasional publication of falsehoods (see analysis). The website was founded by Jim Hoft in 2004 to “speak the truth” and to “expose the wickedness of the left.”

According to their about page “The Gateway Pundit is one of the top political websites. It is consistently ranked as one of the top political blogs in the nation. TGP has been cited by Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, The Drudge Report, The Blaze, Mark Levin, FOX Nation and by several international news organizations.”

Funded by / Ownership

The Gateway Pundit is owned by Jim Hoft and funded primarily through online advertising.

Analysis / Bias

In review, The Gateway Pundit demonstrates extreme right wing bias in story selection that always favors the right and denigrates the left. There is significant use of loaded emotional language in headlines such as this: President Trump RIPS INTO Peter Strzok After He’s Fired – Calls For Hillary ‘Sham Investigation’ to be ‘Properly Redone’. The Gateway Pundit is also fiercely dedicated to the promotion of Donald Trump. TGP always sources their information, but sometimes utilizes questionable sources such as Breitbart and Mike Cernovich, who both a have terrible track records with fact checkers.

The Gateway Pundit has published numerous false or conspiracy stories such as Hillary Clinton having a seizure, identifying an innocent person in the Las Vegas mass shooting and again identifying the wrong person after the motor vehicle homicide at the White Supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia. Further, TGP claimed the “FBI received tips well in advance of the Florida school shooting and decided, for whatever reason, not to act.” Finally, based on publishing false information, TGP has faced lawsuits for defamation and damages to innocent individuals.

A factual search reveals several failed fact checks by IFCN fact checkers. Here are a select few.

Overall, we rate The Gateway Pundit Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of conspiracies and numerous instances of publishing false (fake) news.

The Gateway Pundit - Media Bias/Fact Check
 
Do you guys actually understand what it takes to get a FISA warrant?

If what you guys think is actually true, there are federal judges who broke the law.
You're desperate...

Judges haven't been, and won't be accused of breaking the law, unless there is evidence that they knew the FISA evidence was known to be false and/or unverified.

You know judges don't investigate to verify the veracity of evidence. But I get the fact that you don't have a rational argument.

Perhaps you might want to rethink your comments and stop digging.
 
Read her testimony! It's good. Comey doesn't have a prayers chance of skating away from this.

I hope this lawyer doesn't get arkancided.


FBI Lawyer Squeals Like a Pig: Implicates Comey, McCabe, and Yates for Mishandling of FISA Warrant
Why do you keep posting trash like the gateway pundit? We know they lie about everything.
Have you even read her testimony? Why don't you take a moment and finally get educated?
I haven't read her full testimony, just what was posted in this thread... Can you explain to me what the issue is, what the problem is with the sign offs on it by her bosses before she received it? Even if unusual to her, what was illegal about it? What does this all mean in the bigger picture? The bosses had special interest in the FISA?
 
Do you guys actually understand what it takes to get a FISA warrant?

If what you guys think is actually true, there are federal judges who broke the law.
You're desperate...

Judges haven't been, and won't be accused of breaking the law, unless there is evidence that they knew the FISA evidence was known to be false and/or unverified.

You know judges don't investigate to verify the veracity of evidence. But I get the fact that you don't have a rational argument.

Perhaps you might want to rethink your comments and stop digging.

I don't have to rethink anything. This is a sham investigation based on nothing.
 
Read her testimony! It's good. Comey doesn't have a prayers chance of skating away from this.

I hope this lawyer doesn't get arkancided.


FBI Lawyer Squeals Like a Pig: Implicates Comey, McCabe, and Yates for Mishandling of FISA Warrant
Gateway Pundit, everyone. Ignore.

They are sourced directly from the Congressman’s page that posts transcripts.

Transparency


Far more reliable than a CNN propaganda piece.
The OP did not source the congressman's page. They sourced the retarded idiots at Gateway Pundit.

Feel free to start a thread based on the congressman's page. It won't be retarded, and so I bet you won't.

It was sourced at the gatepaypundit, jackass.
 
Read her testimony! It's good. Comey doesn't have a prayers chance of skating away from this.

I hope this lawyer doesn't get arkancided.


FBI Lawyer Squeals Like a Pig: Implicates Comey, McCabe, and Yates for Mishandling of FISA Warrant
Why do you keep posting trash like the gateway pundit? We know they lie about everything.
Have you even read her testimony? Why don't you take a moment and finally get educated?
I haven't read her full testimony, just what was posted in this thread... Can you explain to me what the issue is, what the problem is with the sign offs on it by her bosses before she received it? Even if unusual to her, what was illegal about it? What does this all mean in the bigger picture? The bosses had special interest in the FISA?

Because political appointees and upper management are not part of the normal process for warrants. It was highly irregular and proof that the warrants were pushed down from the top.
 
Read her testimony! It's good. Comey doesn't have a prayers chance of skating away from this.

I hope this lawyer doesn't get arkancided.


FBI Lawyer Squeals Like a Pig: Implicates Comey, McCabe, and Yates for Mishandling of FISA Warrant
Why do you keep posting trash like the gateway pundit? We know they lie about everything.
Have you even read her testimony? Why don't you take a moment and finally get educated?
I haven't read her full testimony, just what was posted in this thread... Can you explain to me what the issue is, what the problem is with the sign offs on it by her bosses before she received it? Even if unusual to her, what was illegal about it? What does this all mean in the bigger picture? The bosses had special interest in the FISA?

I will answer you, and answer you with civility.

The reason it is bad, is because there is a process put in place at every level of the warrant, since when getting a FISA, there is no "adversarial" testimony given. The process MUST be followed, step by step, to insure a FISA is legit, since this is the only warrant issued in America, where the subject has nobody representing him/her in court.

The LEGAL departments job in issuing a FISA, is to insure that everything is TRUE, and VERIFIED before they submit it to a judge. Now, if you look into Christine Kavelicks written notes on her meeting 10 days BEFORE the 1st FISA was issued, she had BIG PROBLEMS with Steels veracity, and noted that his sources were a Russian General, a Media Misinformation Specialist, and the fact that everything was run through (according to Steele) the Russian Consulate in Miami, to the Trump team in Mira Lago.

She instantly knew he was lying, because there is NO RUSSIAN CONSULATE IN MIAMI!

She sent off her concerns to the FBI, CIA, and DNI in e-mails, which means the 1st FISA should NEVER have been issued, let alone, any following the 1st one. But she did NOT look into it.

Why?

Because PROTOCOL was NOT followed by those above her. Basically, the trail should have started at HER desk, and worked its way up to them, NOT what actually happened, and started on their desks, and pushed down to her!
 
Do you guys actually understand what it takes to get a FISA warrant?

If what you guys think is actually true, there are federal judges who broke the law.
You're desperate...

Judges haven't been, and won't be accused of breaking the law, unless there is evidence that they knew the FISA evidence was known to be false and/or unverified.

You know judges don't investigate to verify the veracity of evidence. But I get the fact that you don't have a rational argument.

Perhaps you might want to rethink your comments and stop digging.

I don't have to rethink anything. This is a sham investigation based on nothing.
Keep doubling down on stupid.

If you think judges can be prosecuted for believing fake FBI evidence, you're probably dumb enough to vote Democrat.
 
Do you guys actually understand what it takes to get a FISA warrant?

If what you guys think is actually true, there are federal judges who broke the law.

But it probably is not. Why?

The Gateway Pundit


extremeright03.png


QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis.

History

The Gateway Pundit is an extreme right news and opinion website that is not afraid of conspiracy theories and the occasional publication of falsehoods (see analysis). The website was founded by Jim Hoft in 2004 to “speak the truth” and to “expose the wickedness of the left.”

According to their about page “The Gateway Pundit is one of the top political websites. It is consistently ranked as one of the top political blogs in the nation. TGP has been cited by Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, The Drudge Report, The Blaze, Mark Levin, FOX Nation and by several international news organizations.”

Funded by / Ownership

The Gateway Pundit is owned by Jim Hoft and funded primarily through online advertising.

Analysis / Bias

In review, The Gateway Pundit demonstrates extreme right wing bias in story selection that always favors the right and denigrates the left. There is significant use of loaded emotional language in headlines such as this: President Trump RIPS INTO Peter Strzok After He’s Fired – Calls For Hillary ‘Sham Investigation’ to be ‘Properly Redone’. The Gateway Pundit is also fiercely dedicated to the promotion of Donald Trump. TGP always sources their information, but sometimes utilizes questionable sources such as Breitbart and Mike Cernovich, who both a have terrible track records with fact checkers.

The Gateway Pundit has published numerous false or conspiracy stories such as Hillary Clinton having a seizure, identifying an innocent person in the Las Vegas mass shooting and again identifying the wrong person after the motor vehicle homicide at the White Supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia. Further, TGP claimed the “FBI received tips well in advance of the Florida school shooting and decided, for whatever reason, not to act.” Finally, based on publishing false information, TGP has faced lawsuits for defamation and damages to innocent individuals.

A factual search reveals several failed fact checks by IFCN fact checkers. Here are a select few.

Overall, we rate The Gateway Pundit Questionable based on extreme right wing bias, promotion of conspiracies and numerous instances of publishing false (fake) news.

The Gateway Pundit - Media Bias/Fact Check
You can call a source extremely one side or the other, but that is not helpful when what they are printing is not a story, but the actual testimony, word for word, of a witness. So you post about extremely conservative but it is impossible for it to be biased one side or another when the words, phrases and opinions are not of the Gateway Pundit but of the witness at the hearing.
 
Read her testimony! It's good. Comey doesn't have a prayers chance of skating away from this.

I hope this lawyer doesn't get arkancided.


FBI Lawyer Squeals Like a Pig: Implicates Comey, McCabe, and Yates for Mishandling of FISA Warrant
Why do you keep posting trash like the gateway pundit? We know they lie about everything.
Have you even read her testimony? Why don't you take a moment and finally get educated?
I haven't read her full testimony, just what was posted in this thread... Can you explain to me what the issue is, what the problem is with the sign offs on it by her bosses before she received it? Even if unusual to her, what was illegal about it? What does this all mean in the bigger picture? The bosses had special interest in the FISA?

I will answer you, and answer you with civility.

The reason it is bad, is because there is a process put in place at every level of the warrant, since when getting a FISA, there is no "adversarial" testimony given. The process MUST be followed, step by step, to insure a FISA is legit, since this is the only warrant issued in America, where the subject has nobody representing him/her in court.

The LEGAL departments job in issuing a FISA, is to insure that everything is TRUE, and VERIFIED before they submit it to a judge. Now, if you look into Christine Kavelicks written notes on her meeting 10 days BEFORE the 1st FISA was issued, she had BIG PROBLEMS with Steels veracity, and noted that his sources were a Russian General, a Media Misinformation Specialist, and the fact that everything was run through (according to Steele) the Russian Consulate in Miami, to the Trump team in Mira Lago.

She instantly knew he was lying, because there is NO RUSSIAN CONSULATE IN MIAMI!

She sent off her concerns to the FBI, CIA, and DNI in e-mails, which means the 1st FISA should NEVER have been issued, let alone, any following the 1st one. But she did NOT look into it.

Why?

Because PROTOCOL was NOT followed by those above her. Basically, the trail should have started at HER desk, and worked its way up to them, NOT what actually happened, and started on their desks, and pushed down to her!
And Comey signed off on the first FISA warrant. That's telling!
 
Read her testimony! It's good. Comey doesn't have a prayers chance of skating away from this.

I hope this lawyer doesn't get arkancided.


FBI Lawyer Squeals Like a Pig: Implicates Comey, McCabe, and Yates for Mishandling of FISA Warrant
Why do you keep posting trash like the gateway pundit? We know they lie about everything.
Dean, I'll try this again. It is impossible for GPundit to lie when quoting testimony. Not one word of the OP's link is written by GP. It is nothing but testimony from the hearing and it is surprisingly unredacted. It throws McCabe under the bus, explains the chain of command and how it is not always followed at the FBI and discusses the veracity some of Comey's statements when he declared that no prosecutor would try to indict someone like Hillary who continued to break the rules in regard to secret documents on private networks, opening people up for blackmail.
 
Read her testimony! It's good. Comey doesn't have a prayers chance of skating away from this.

I hope this lawyer doesn't get arkancided.


FBI Lawyer Squeals Like a Pig: Implicates Comey, McCabe, and Yates for Mishandling of FISA Warrant
Why do you keep posting trash like the gateway pundit? We know they lie about everything.
Dean, I'll try this again. It is impossible for GPundit to lie when quoting testimony. Not one word of the OP's link is written by GP. It is nothing but testimony from the hearing and it is surprisingly unredacted. It throws McCabe under the bus, explains the chain of command and how it is not always followed at the FBI and discusses the veracity some of Comey's statements when he declared that no prosecutor would try to indict someone like Hillary who continued to break the rules in regard to secret documents on private networks, opening people up for blackmail.
Thanks for that easy breakdown. Hopefully Dean can decipher it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top