- Mar 11, 2015
- 76,555
- 33,201
- 2,330
- Thread starter
- #41
There you go claiming percents again. Blacks account for half of all murders so blacks are 6 times more likely then whites to commit murder.Well, as indicated by various statistic quoted above, "whites" are victimized by "Blacks" dramatically more often than Blacks are victimized by "whites." So the question becomes, if the "white" victims are not victims of "hate" crimes, are they any less victimized? Is a person who is robbed for money any less a robbery victim than one who is victimized for his race?
In the Big Picture, "Blacks" come out way ahead. More likely to be the victim of a "hate" crime, but much less likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.
The stats show no such thing. For example 9 out of 10 whites are victims of crime done to them by another white. Blacks are more likely to be the victim of a hate crime committed by whites, while whites are at least 6 times more likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.
I claim the facts and you are wrong.