FBI Hate Crime Reports 2010-2017 Show Black Americans Are Victimized At Epidemic Proportions

Well, as indicated by various statistic quoted above, "whites" are victimized by "Blacks" dramatically more often than Blacks are victimized by "whites." So the question becomes, if the "white" victims are not victims of "hate" crimes, are they any less victimized? Is a person who is robbed for money any less a robbery victim than one who is victimized for his race?

In the Big Picture, "Blacks" come out way ahead. More likely to be the victim of a "hate" crime, but much less likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.

The stats show no such thing. For example 9 out of 10 whites are victims of crime done to them by another white. Blacks are more likely to be the victim of a hate crime committed by whites, while whites are at least 6 times more likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.
There you go claiming percents again. Blacks account for half of all murders so blacks are 6 times more likely then whites to commit murder.

I claim the facts and you are wrong.
 
Well, as indicated by various statistic quoted above, "whites" are victimized by "Blacks" dramatically more often than Blacks are victimized by "whites." So the question becomes, if the "white" victims are not victims of "hate" crimes, are they any less victimized? Is a person who is robbed for money any less a robbery victim than one who is victimized for his race?

In the Big Picture, "Blacks" come out way ahead. More likely to be the victim of a "hate" crime, but much less likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.

The stats show no such thing. For example 9 out of 10 whites are victims of crime done to them by another white. Blacks are more likely to be the victim of a hate crime committed by whites, while whites are at least 6 times more likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.
We had a white punk get shot by a cop last summer and died. No white people rioted or looted or burned any businesses.

Was that kid unarmed and not committing a crime? And if so, was the cop filmed committing the crime and never faced a penalty? Have white been the victims of such killings for the last 200 years? Drop the false equivalences son. Because blacks don't riot because we run out of pumpkins.
 
White Americans are mostly victimized by other whites.
 
Well, as indicated by various statistic quoted above, "whites" are victimized by "Blacks" dramatically more often than Blacks are victimized by "whites." So the question becomes, if the "white" victims are not victims of "hate" crimes, are they any less victimized? Is a person who is robbed for money any less a robbery victim than one who is victimized for his race?

In the Big Picture, "Blacks" come out way ahead. More likely to be the victim of a "hate" crime, but much less likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.

The stats show no such thing. For example 9 out of 10 whites are victims of crime done to them by another white. Blacks are more likely to be the victim of a hate crime committed by whites, while whites are at least 6 times more likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.
All crime is hate crime.

Tell that to the FBI.
 
Well, as indicated by various statistic quoted above, "whites" are victimized by "Blacks" dramatically more often than Blacks are victimized by "whites." So the question becomes, if the "white" victims are not victims of "hate" crimes, are they any less victimized? Is a person who is robbed for money any less a robbery victim than one who is victimized for his race?

In the Big Picture, "Blacks" come out way ahead. More likely to be the victim of a "hate" crime, but much less likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.

The stats show no such thing. For example 9 out of 10 whites are victims of crime done to them by another white. Blacks are more likely to be the victim of a hate crime committed by whites, while whites are at least 6 times more likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.
We had a white punk get shot by a cop last summer and died. No white people rioted or looted or burned any businesses.

Was that kid unarmed and not committing a crime? And if so, was the cop filmed committing the crime and never faced a penalty? Have white been the victims of such killings for the last 200 years? Drop the false equivalences son. Because blacks don't riot because we run out of pumpkins.
Michael Brown strong armed a store owner and then
Well, as indicated by various statistic quoted above, "whites" are victimized by "Blacks" dramatically more often than Blacks are victimized by "whites." So the question becomes, if the "white" victims are not victims of "hate" crimes, are they any less victimized? Is a person who is robbed for money any less a robbery victim than one who is victimized for his race?

In the Big Picture, "Blacks" come out way ahead. More likely to be the victim of a "hate" crime, but much less likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.

The stats show no such thing. For example 9 out of 10 whites are victims of crime done to them by another white. Blacks are more likely to be the victim of a hate crime committed by whites, while whites are at least 6 times more likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.
All crime is hate crime.

Tell that to the FBI.
Well, as indicated by various statistic quoted above, "whites" are victimized by "Blacks" dramatically more often than Blacks are victimized by "whites." So the question becomes, if the "white" victims are not victims of "hate" crimes, are they any less victimized? Is a person who is robbed for money any less a robbery victim than one who is victimized for his race?

In the Big Picture, "Blacks" come out way ahead. More likely to be the victim of a "hate" crime, but much less likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.

The stats show no such thing. For example 9 out of 10 whites are victims of crime done to them by another white. Blacks are more likely to be the victim of a hate crime committed by whites, while whites are at least 6 times more likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.
All crime is hate crime.

Tell that to the FBI.
The FBI doesn't legislate.
 
Well, as indicated by various statistic quoted above, "whites" are victimized by "Blacks" dramatically more often than Blacks are victimized by "whites." So the question becomes, if the "white" victims are not victims of "hate" crimes, are they any less victimized? Is a person who is robbed for money any less a robbery victim than one who is victimized for his race?

In the Big Picture, "Blacks" come out way ahead. More likely to be the victim of a "hate" crime, but much less likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.

The stats show no such thing. For example 9 out of 10 whites are victims of crime done to them by another white. Blacks are more likely to be the victim of a hate crime committed by whites, while whites are at least 6 times more likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.
There you go claiming percents again. Blacks account for half of all murders so blacks are 6 times more likely then whites to commit murder.

I claim the facts and you are wrong.
No I am not of known murderers half are black and that means that a black is 6 times more likely to commit a murder then a white, you see if you can use percents then so can I dumb ass.
 
In every tally of hate crimes, blacks are the most frequent victims

Violence, property crimes, threats and other offenses inspired by racial animus amounted to the most frequent type of hate crime reported in the FBI’s most recent tally of bias crimes. In fact, black Americans have been the most frequent victims of hate crime in every tally of bias incidents generated since the FBI began collecting such data in the early 1990s.

“One of the things that is amazing about black experiences in America is that the country wants to at once send you very clear messages that you don’t belong,” said Koritha Mitchell, an associate processor of English at Ohio State University who researches hate crimes and their depiction in literature. “That you should expect and accept some kind of half measure of citizenship and then pretend that the country did not send you that message."

She added: "There is this constant demand for our silence about what we experience and, failing that, our forgiveness before our loved one’s bodies are in the ground. It’s like a form of national gaslighting.”


In every tally of hate crimes, blacks are the most frequent victims

I guess she's a racist too.

What about hate crimes against whites?

"black Americans have been the most frequent victims of hate crime in every tally of bias incidents generated since the FBI began collecting such data in the early 1990s."

Crimes against whites equals small percentage of hate crimes, FBI statistics show

According to the 2015 FBI hate crime statistics, the latest available, there were 613 anti-white-related crimes out of 5,850 total cases. That's around 10.5 percent of all reported hate crimes, and within the yearly average, federal numbers show.

By comparison, the FBI reports there were 1,745 anti-black hate crimes or about 30 percent of all reported incidents. Jews were the most targeted religious group that year and were victims of 11 percent of all hate crimes. It's not clear how many anti-Jewish hate crime victims also may have been attacked because of their race.

The 2015 FBI data showed that of the 734 total reported offenses committed against whites — a single incident could have multiple offenses like assault or theft — 46 percent of those were committed by blacks.

In contrast, of the 2,125 reported offenses committed against blacks, 58 percent of those who committed by whites.

Crimes against whites equals small percentage of hate crimes, FBI statistics show
5,850 crimes in a country of 320 million. Hardly the most pressing crime issue in the country.

Unless it happen to whites.

But hey, there were over 7 million whites arrested for crimes. That's about 2.5 times more than anyone else . So that would be the most pressing crime issue in the country.
There are more white people so that figures. The biggest concern to most is the VIOLENT crimes. It isn't whites.
 
The reprehensible, dishonest right will only continue to attempt to ignore these facts.
STFUdonnyjpg.jpg
 
Well, as indicated by various statistic quoted above, "whites" are victimized by "Blacks" dramatically more often than Blacks are victimized by "whites." So the question becomes, if the "white" victims are not victims of "hate" crimes, are they any less victimized? Is a person who is robbed for money any less a robbery victim than one who is victimized for his race?

In the Big Picture, "Blacks" come out way ahead. More likely to be the victim of a "hate" crime, but much less likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.

The stats show no such thing. For example 9 out of 10 whites are victims of crime done to them by another white. Blacks are more likely to be the victim of a hate crime committed by whites, while whites are at least 6 times more likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.
But blacks are more likely to be victims of crimes committed against them by blacks.
 
Well, as indicated by various statistic quoted above, "whites" are victimized by "Blacks" dramatically more often than Blacks are victimized by "whites." So the question becomes, if the "white" victims are not victims of "hate" crimes, are they any less victimized? Is a person who is robbed for money any less a robbery victim than one who is victimized for his race?

In the Big Picture, "Blacks" come out way ahead. More likely to be the victim of a "hate" crime, but much less likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.

The stats show no such thing. For example 9 out of 10 whites are victims of crime done to them by another white. Blacks are more likely to be the victim of a hate crime committed by whites, while whites are at least 6 times more likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.
We had a white punk get shot by a cop last summer and died. No white people rioted or looted or burned any businesses.

Was that kid unarmed and not committing a crime? And if so, was the cop filmed committing the crime and never faced a penalty? Have white been the victims of such killings for the last 200 years? Drop the false equivalences son. Because blacks don't riot because we run out of pumpkins.
Michael Brown strong armed a store owner and then
Well, as indicated by various statistic quoted above, "whites" are victimized by "Blacks" dramatically more often than Blacks are victimized by "whites." So the question becomes, if the "white" victims are not victims of "hate" crimes, are they any less victimized? Is a person who is robbed for money any less a robbery victim than one who is victimized for his race?

In the Big Picture, "Blacks" come out way ahead. More likely to be the victim of a "hate" crime, but much less likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.

The stats show no such thing. For example 9 out of 10 whites are victims of crime done to them by another white. Blacks are more likely to be the victim of a hate crime committed by whites, while whites are at least 6 times more likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.
All crime is hate crime.

Tell that to the FBI.
Well, as indicated by various statistic quoted above, "whites" are victimized by "Blacks" dramatically more often than Blacks are victimized by "whites." So the question becomes, if the "white" victims are not victims of "hate" crimes, are they any less victimized? Is a person who is robbed for money any less a robbery victim than one who is victimized for his race?

In the Big Picture, "Blacks" come out way ahead. More likely to be the victim of a "hate" crime, but much less likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.

The stats show no such thing. For example 9 out of 10 whites are victims of crime done to them by another white. Blacks are more likely to be the victim of a hate crime committed by whites, while whites are at least 6 times more likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.
All crime is hate crime.

Tell that to the FBI.
The FBI doesn't legislate.

Mike Brown took a box of cigars. Understand maggot?

Let's not use the white boy conflation.
 
Well, as indicated by various statistic quoted above, "whites" are victimized by "Blacks" dramatically more often than Blacks are victimized by "whites." So the question becomes, if the "white" victims are not victims of "hate" crimes, are they any less victimized? Is a person who is robbed for money any less a robbery victim than one who is victimized for his race?

In the Big Picture, "Blacks" come out way ahead. More likely to be the victim of a "hate" crime, but much less likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.

The stats show no such thing. For example 9 out of 10 whites are victims of crime done to them by another white. Blacks are more likely to be the victim of a hate crime committed by whites, while whites are at least 6 times more likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.
There you go claiming percents again. Blacks account for half of all murders so blacks are 6 times more likely then whites to commit murder.

I claim the facts and you are wrong.
No I am not of known murderers half are black and that means that a black is 6 times more likely to commit a murder then a white, you see if you can use percents then so can I dumb ass.

Whites are 6 times more likely to kill another white person than a black person is. Now there are all kinds of economic areas blacks are 5 times more to be where whites have 10 times as much and they still commit half the murders and 70 percent of all crime. My percentages are accurate, yours is based on your racism and the imagination of how you think things would be if blacks had the same population as whites. Conveniently the white racist hypothetical does not include increased employment or wealth that would occur.
 
Well, as indicated by various statistic quoted above, "whites" are victimized by "Blacks" dramatically more often than Blacks are victimized by "whites." So the question becomes, if the "white" victims are not victims of "hate" crimes, are they any less victimized? Is a person who is robbed for money any less a robbery victim than one who is victimized for his race?

In the Big Picture, "Blacks" come out way ahead. More likely to be the victim of a "hate" crime, but much less likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.

The stats show no such thing. For example 9 out of 10 whites are victims of crime done to them by another white. Blacks are more likely to be the victim of a hate crime committed by whites, while whites are at least 6 times more likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.
There you go claiming percents again. Blacks account for half of all murders so blacks are 6 times more likely then whites to commit murder.

I claim the facts and you are wrong.
No I am not of known murderers half are black and that means that a black is 6 times more likely to commit a murder then a white, you see if you can use percents then so can I dumb ass.

Whites are 6 times more likely to kill another white person than a black person is. Now there are all kinds of economic areas blacks are 5 times more to be where whites have 10 times as much and they still commit half the murders and 70 percent of all crime. My percentages are accurate, yours is based on your racism and the imagination of how you think things would be if blacks had the same population as whites. Conveniently the white racist hypothetical does not include increased employment or wealth that would occur.
You really aren't too smart, are ya?
 
Well, as indicated by various statistic quoted above, "whites" are victimized by "Blacks" dramatically more often than Blacks are victimized by "whites." So the question becomes, if the "white" victims are not victims of "hate" crimes, are they any less victimized? Is a person who is robbed for money any less a robbery victim than one who is victimized for his race?

In the Big Picture, "Blacks" come out way ahead. More likely to be the victim of a "hate" crime, but much less likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.

The stats show no such thing. For example 9 out of 10 whites are victims of crime done to them by another white. Blacks are more likely to be the victim of a hate crime committed by whites, while whites are at least 6 times more likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.
There you go claiming percents again. Blacks account for half of all murders so blacks are 6 times more likely then whites to commit murder.

I claim the facts and you are wrong.
No I am not of known murderers half are black and that means that a black is 6 times more likely to commit a murder then a white, you see if you can use percents then so can I dumb ass.

Whites are 6 times more likely to kill another white person than a black person is. Now there are all kinds of economic areas blacks are 5 times more to be where whites have 10 times as much and they still commit half the murders and 70 percent of all crime. My percentages are accurate, yours is based on your racism and the imagination of how you think things would be if blacks had the same population as whites. Conveniently the white racist hypothetical does not include increased employment or wealth that would occur.
So you think that as long as blacks keep killing each other it's not a problem???
Sorry, the only reason whites are more likely to kill each other is because there's roughly 10 times as many whites than blacks.....but if you take this into consideration, blacks are responsible for more than their share of violent crimes.
 
Well, as indicated by various statistic quoted above, "whites" are victimized by "Blacks" dramatically more often than Blacks are victimized by "whites." So the question becomes, if the "white" victims are not victims of "hate" crimes, are they any less victimized? Is a person who is robbed for money any less a robbery victim than one who is victimized for his race?

In the Big Picture, "Blacks" come out way ahead. More likely to be the victim of a "hate" crime, but much less likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.

The stats show no such thing. For example 9 out of 10 whites are victims of crime done to them by another white. Blacks are more likely to be the victim of a hate crime committed by whites, while whites are at least 6 times more likely to be a victim of a crime committed by whites.
There you go claiming percents again. Blacks account for half of all murders so blacks are 6 times more likely then whites to commit murder.

I claim the facts and you are wrong.
No I am not of known murderers half are black and that means that a black is 6 times more likely to commit a murder then a white, you see if you can use percents then so can I dumb ass.

Whites are 6 times more likely to kill another white person than a black person is. Now there are all kinds of economic areas blacks are 5 times more to be where whites have 10 times as much and they still commit half the murders and 70 percent of all crime. My percentages are accurate, yours is based on your racism and the imagination of how you think things would be if blacks had the same population as whites. Conveniently the white racist hypothetical does not include increased employment or wealth that would occur.
Percents don't care about how many total of each subset there are they are PERCENTS of that total. Of the black subset a black is 6 times more likely to commit a murder then a white in the white subset.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top