'Fast and furious' has Obama on defensive

[bigrebnc1775]

So obama supports think if we combine all the threads about fast and the furious togethjer it will make obama's troubles go away?
That's rich

 

[whitehall]

Barry Hussein's defensive strategy has always relied on the liberal media. F/F would have been ignored just like the security document releases if there were no alternate sources of information what weren't playing pocket pool with the administration. If the media ever becomes fair and balanced Barry will be laughed out of Washington.

 

[Truthmatters]

The FACTS make this go away.

you see not every American is a fox veiwer idiot

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The FACTS make this go away.

you see not every American is a fox veiwer idiot

The facts with be obama's doom

 

[HUGGY]

How many threads do we need on this subject?

Just because it has fast and the furious in the thread doesn't mean it's like the other threads. It's specific dealing with an specific event of the issue

GGAAAAWWWDDDD!!!!! You are one stupid sumbitch.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

How many threads do we need on this subject?

Just because it has fast and the furious in the thread doesn't mean it's like the other threads. It's specific dealing with an specific event of the issue

GGAAAAWWWDDDD!!!!! You are one stupid sumbitch.

If that were the case a lot of threads like the romney threads obama threads would have to be merged.
Anything dealing with the economy would have to be merged no matter how different the subjects might be.
Oh and dumb ass =threads should be merged if they are dealing with the same story and have the same link not different story's about the same issue.
Maybe a board should be started for fast and the furious. if seeing the title gives you that butt hurt feeling.

 

[naturegirl]

It's kind of fitting the Lame Stream Media is just picking this up. A little more than 4 months before the election. They waited too long to find excuses for him.

Wonder how they'll handle the security leaks to boost his political agenda??

 

[Truthmatters]

who did the leak?

 

[naturegirl]

who did the leak?

^^^ this is why your party is dying.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

who did the leak?

Why do you want to know? So you can hunt them down?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

who did the leak?

^^^ this is why your party is dying.

I agree.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

For Obama, the political costs of the executive privilege showdown are obvious: In an election year, there’s little upside to him being tied more closely to a failed gun-smuggling investigation that may have led to the death of at least one U.S. law enforcement agent and hundreds of killings in Mexico. The executive privilege claim also undercuts his promises to run the most transparent administration in history and could open him to claims of hypocrisy and coverup.

Read more: Fast and Furious: How President Obama and John Boehner got to the brink - Josh Gerstein and Jake Sherman - POLITICO.com

 

[waltky]

'And the beat goes on, and the beat goes on...

US congressional gun probe continues
Mon, Jun 25, 2012 - WHODUNNIT?: Involving the murder of a law enforcement officer and allegations of a government cover-up, the investigation is set to ruffle more than a few political feathers

In the classic Washington investigation at the highest levels of power, it is never the original offense that leads to trouble. It is who knew what and who said what that brings forth the cry of cover-up. That script is being followed almost to the letter in the drama that continues this week as the US’ Republican-controlled House of Representatives prepares for a possible vote on contempt of US Congress charges against Attorney General Eric Holder. It began as a congressional probe of Operation “Fast and Furious,” a botched effort by the US Department of Justice’s Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) to trace illegal gun trafficking to Mexican drug cartels.

Now it is about a letter from the Justice Department to members of Congress dated Feb. 4 of last year that denied the operation’s existence. “False,” former US assistant attorney general Ronald Weich wrote in that letter of US Senator Chuck Grassley’s contention that the ATF sanctioned the sale of hundreds of assault weapons to “straw purchasers” of guns. Those front men, Grassley said, transported the weapons into Mexico, where US officials lost track of them as they fell into the hands of violent drug cartels. However, as anger was growing over revelations that one of the Fast and Furious guns had been found at the scene of US Border Patrol agent Brian Terry’s murder in late 2010, the Justice Department began to back-pedal amid press reports about what whistleblowers were telling congressional investigators.

The Justice Department’s position eroded further last year in June, when Weich testified to Congress that there were “serious questions about how ATF conducted this operation.” Furthermore, he said, “we’re not clinging to the statements” in the Feb. 4 letter. The Justice Department “obstructed the investigation” for nearly a year, said Representative Darrell Issa, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. What the committee now wants to know is how and when officials knew the Feb. 4 letter was wrong and why it took so long for them to retract it. The subpoena the committee issued last week was largely for post-Feb. 4 documents that might shed light on those questions. The claim of executive privilege invoked by US President Barack Obama at the request of his attorney general covers those very same papers.

Holder says he has turned over thousands of pages pertaining to the Fast and Furious operation, but deliberations among officials after Feb. 4 are off-limits. The administration notes it provided Congress with several thousand pages of documents and other information that give lawmakers a full picture of why the misleading letter was produced. The blame, those documents suggest, is with a federal prosecutor’s office in Arizona and law enforcement agents who conceived and directed Fast and Furious. High-level Justice officials say they relied on them for the information that led to the erroneous letter. Last July 4, Issa convened a private session to get testimony from ATF acting director Kenneth Melson. In it, Melson testified that he had discovered in March that ATF agents had been instructed to allow the guns to “walk” into Mexico.

More US congressional gun probe continues - Taipei Times