Fascism killed less than Capitalism, Communism, or Monarchy, but takes more heat for it.

[Ringel05]

There's without a doubt no questions asked that Capitalism, Communism, and Monarchy killed more than Fascism.

Fascism killed about 30 million, between Hitler, and Mussolini.

Communism killed about 100 million between Stalin, Mao, Polpot etc.

Capitalism killed about 60 million in the British Raj India, and about 30 million in the USA. (There's more) when you account for those killed from lack of care)

Monarchy killed about 40 million in WW1, and about 10 million in the Belgian Congo by King Leopold, and of course others.

The big question is how come only Fascism (For the most part) takes the heat for it?

Fascism is a potentially viable economic system, as the Nazis saw big economic growth, as did Peron, or Franco who used many Fascist elements.

I think we should be able to openly support Fascist economic elements, without being demonized evil.

Nazism is what takes most of the heat, not so much fascism, and Nazism under Hitler wasn't true Fascism, it was Hitler's perversion of Fascism, why do you think he got rid of Rohm, Rohm and the SA leaders were beginning to demand Hitler institute the socialistic Fascist policies.

Fascism: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics | Library of Economics and Liberty

Yes many more millions have been butchered in many different names but most were wars and not deliberate genocide plus the deliberate extermination by overwork and starvation of millions of Soviet prisoners of war whom the Nazis saw as subhuman and treated as such.

Google

Well, Soviets butchered Ukrainians by famine, that's so much better?

Brits butchered Indians, and the Irish by famine, that's so much better?

I said it's so much better? How'd you pull that one out of your ass?

Well, if all systems killed, I fail to see why Fascism takes most of the heat for it.

9 times out of 10, films, or history books,etc. are talking anti-Fascist points, rather than anti-Communist, or anti-Capitalist points.

Real attempted genocide of specific groups of people which of course you will deny and claim it didn't happen. Don't bother, I've seen all the bull shit arguments your ilk present.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

There's without a doubt no questions asked that Capitalism, Communism, and Monarchy killed more than Fascism.

Fascism killed about 30 million, between Hitler, and Mussolini.

Communism killed about 100 million between Stalin, Mao, Polpot etc.

Capitalism killed about 60 million in the British Raj India, and about 30 million in the USA. (There's more) when you account for those killed from lack of care)

Monarchy killed about 40 million in WW1, and about 10 million in the Belgian Congo by King Leopold, and of course others.

The big question is how come only Fascism (For the most part) takes the heat for it?

Fascism is a potentially viable economic system, as the Nazis saw big economic growth, as did Peron, or Franco who used many Fascist elements.

I think we should be able to openly support Fascist economic elements, without being demonized evil.

Nazism is what takes most of the heat, not so much fascism, and Nazism under Hitler wasn't true Fascism, it was Hitler's perversion of Fascism, why do you think he got rid of Rohm, Rohm and the SA leaders were beginning to demand Hitler institute the socialistic Fascist policies.

Fascism: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics | Library of Economics and Liberty

Yes many more millions have been butchered in many different names but most were wars and not deliberate genocide plus the deliberate extermination by overwork and starvation of millions of Soviet prisoners of war whom the Nazis saw as subhuman and treated as such.

Google

Well, Soviets butchered Ukrainians by famine, that's so much better?

Brits butchered Indians, and the Irish by famine, that's so much better?

I said it's so much better? How'd you pull that one out of your ass?

Well, if all systems killed, I fail to see why Fascism takes most of the heat for it.

9 times out of 10, films, or history books,etc. are talking anti-Fascist points, rather than anti-Communist, or anti-Capitalist points.

Real attempted genocide of specific groups of people which of course you will deny and claim it didn't happen. Don't bother, I've seen all the bull shit arguments your ilk present.

The Capitalists were more successful in wiping out people, Fuegian Natives, or Sel'knam Natives, or Tasmanian Aboriginals come to mind.

 

[AVISSSER]

deliberate extermination by overwork and starvation of millions of Soviet prisoners of war whom the Nazis saw as subhuman and treated as such.

Well pot, let's not be so quick with kettle. The Soviets did exactly the same. Many German soldiers died in Soviet labor camps under equally horrible conditions, years after Germany's surrender.

 

[Ringel05]

Nazism is what takes most of the heat, not so much fascism, and Nazism under Hitler wasn't true Fascism, it was Hitler's perversion of Fascism, why do you think he got rid of Rohm, Rohm and the SA leaders were beginning to demand Hitler institute the socialistic Fascist policies.

Fascism: The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics | Library of Economics and Liberty

Yes many more millions have been butchered in many different names but most were wars and not deliberate genocide plus the deliberate extermination by overwork and starvation of millions of Soviet prisoners of war whom the Nazis saw as subhuman and treated as such.

Google

Well, Soviets butchered Ukrainians by famine, that's so much better?

Brits butchered Indians, and the Irish by famine, that's so much better?

I said it's so much better? How'd you pull that one out of your ass?

Well, if all systems killed, I fail to see why Fascism takes most of the heat for it.

9 times out of 10, films, or history books,etc. are talking anti-Fascist points, rather than anti-Communist, or anti-Capitalist points.

Real attempted genocide of specific groups of people which of course you will deny and claim it didn't happen. Don't bother, I've seen all the bull shit arguments your ilk present.

The Capitalists were more successful in wiping out people, Fuegian Natives, or Sel'knam Natives, or Tasmanian Aboriginals come to mind.

So? Why do I care?

 

[Ringel05]

deliberate extermination by overwork and starvation of millions of Soviet prisoners of war whom the Nazis saw as subhuman and treated as such.

Well pot, let's not be so quick with kettle. The Soviets did exactly the same. Many German soldiers died in Soviet labor camps under equally horrible conditions, years after Germany's surrender.

No shit Sherlock, did an adult tell you that?