Fascism is logical

[dfens]

What we cannot admit is how fascism is correct.

Fascists are in favor of national sovereignty as opposed to globalism. This makes sense, as the vast majority of people everywhere on the planet are nationalist in orientation.

Fascists wanted everybody to work for the common good, and for spongers and the greedy to be punished. In return, everybody would get their fair share of wealth, which of course wouldn't be equal, but it would be based on work and productivity.

Fascism really did represent a middle ground between international capitalism, and international socialism, both of which, to this very day, are utopian, globalist systems which try to impose themselves on the world.

 

[DGS49]

Fascism is..."a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism."

The major Fascist regimes of the recent past have in large part focused on the Racist aspect, with the dictator relying on the Peoples' willingness to accept totalitarianism due to the supposed superiority of the "race" that rules. Aryans, Japanese, Italians.

There is nothing "correct" about Fascism, even if you can accept the racist aspect (in a homogeneous society). Planned economies are invariably stupid economies, where bureaucrats and politicians decide what to produce and how to distribute it.

Authoritarian regimes (if that's what you really mean) have possibilities, but as the saying goes, "power corrupts," and those in power will inevitably shift to Kleptocracy.

 

[Unkotare]

The OP doesn't understand at least two of the words in the thread title.

 

[heil hitler]

Fascism is..."a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism."

The major Fascist regimes of the recent past have in large part focused on the Racist aspect, with the dictator relying on the Peoples' willingness to accept totalitarianism due to the supposed superiority of the "race" that rules. Aryans, Japanese, Italians.

There is nothing "correct" about Fascism, even if you can accept the racist aspect (in a homogeneous society). Planned economies are invariably stupid economies, where bureaucrats and politicians decide what to produce and how to distribute it.

Authoritarian regimes (if that's what you really mean) have possibilities, but as the saying goes, "power corrupts," and those in power will inevitably shift to Kleptocracy.

I just want to tell you that your extra crispy chicken is THE best.

 

[crunchy]

What we cannot admit is how fascism is correct.

Fascists are in favor of national sovereignty as opposed to globalism. This makes sense, as the vast majority of people everywhere on the planet are nationalist in orientation.

Fascists wanted everybody to work for the common good, and for spongers and the greedy to be punished. In return, everybody would get their fair share of wealth, which of course wouldn't be equal, but it would be based on work and productivity.

Fascism really did represent a middle ground between international capitalism, and international socialism, both of which, to this very day, are utopian, globalist systems which try to impose themselves on the world.

I agree.