Faith Healing Parents Assert Religious Rights

Discussion in 'Religion and Ethics' started by Shogun, Dec 13, 2008.

  1. Shogun
    Offline

    Shogun Free: Mudholes Stomped

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Messages:
    30,495
    Thanks Received:
    2,224
    Trophy Points:
    1,043
    Ratings:
    +2,260
    They Want Charges Dropped in Faith Healing Death of Their Toddler Daughter

    A Clackamas County, Ore., couple accused of letting their infant daughter die by relying on prayer, rather than medicine, today asked that the charges be dropped, arguing that they infringe on their freedom of religion and their right to raise their children in their own way.
    faith healing
    Carl Worthington, left, and Raylene Worthington of Clackamas County, Ore., were charged with second... Expand
    Carl Worthington, left, and Raylene Worthington of Clackamas County, Ore., were charged with second degree manslaughter and criminal mistreatment charges March 28, 2008, after their 15-month-old daughter died from what the state medical examiner said were easily cured illnesses. Collapse
    (KATU.com)

    Carl Worthington, 28, and his wife, Raylene, 25, belong to a church that believes in faith healing, and police said that, instead of going to a doctor when their 15-month-old daughter Ava got sick, they turned to prayer.

    The infant girl died March 2 from bacterial bronchial pneumonia and an infection, both of which could have been cured with common antibiotics, the medical examiner said.

    The Worthingtons face charges of second degree manslaughter and criminal mistreatment charges. They surrendered to police in March, but were subsequently released after each posted $25,000 bail.

    The motion filed in Clackamas County Circuit Court by the Worthingtons' lawyer today claims that their prosecution is a violation of the rights guaranteed them under both the state and federal constitutions.

    "Mr. and Mrs. Worthington maintain that their prosecution contravenes their right 'to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their own consciences,' as guaranteed by the Constitution of the State of Oregon and the Constitution of the United States," the motion said. "Further, Mr. and Mrs. Worthington urge that this prosecution contravenes their fundamental right to raise their children without interference by the State." A hearing on the motion is scheduled for Jan. 7, 2009.

    The Worthingtons are members of the Followers of Christ Church in Oregon City, that has a history of shunning medical care in favor of faith healing.

    Another Oregon City couple who belong to the same church face similar charges, after their son -- who was Ava Worthington's uncle -- died in June.

    Jeffrey Dean Beagley, 50, and Marci Rae Beagley, 46, pleaded not guilty Oct. 3 to criminally negligent homicide charges in the death of their son, 16-year-old Neil Jeffrey Beagley.

    Neil died June 17 from complications of a urinary tract blockage, according to medical examiners. The condition, which doctors say is easily treatable, caused kidney and heart failure.

    A decade ago, the church received national attention after ABC News affiliate KATU-TV in Portland, Ore., reported that the state medical examiner believed approximately 20 children, whose parents belonged to the church, had died from untreated illnesses that were curable.

    For more of KATU's coverage of the case, click here.

    After that story broke, the Oregon state legislature changed the law to bar defendants, in most cases, from claiming their religious beliefs prevented them from seeking medical help.

    According to the Worthingtons' motion filed today, their case is the first application of that revised statute.

    Though the revised law removed the so-called "spiritual healing defense," there is still a provision that allows judges to give parents a lighter sentence, based on their beliefs.

    ABC News: Faith Healing Parents Assert Religious Rights
     
  2. Shogun
    Offline

    Shogun Free: Mudholes Stomped

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Messages:
    30,495
    Thanks Received:
    2,224
    Trophy Points:
    1,043
    Ratings:
    +2,260
    [​IMG]
     
  3. KittenKoder
    Offline

    KittenKoder Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Messages:
    23,281
    Thanks Received:
    1,711
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Ratings:
    +1,714
    This is why many atheists think religion is an illness, and sometimes I have to agree with them.
     
  4. Agnapostate
    Offline

    Agnapostate BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    6,860
    Thanks Received:
    344
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    The Quake State
    Ratings:
    +344
    Some aspects certainly are. Other aspects are quite commendable. But the commendable aspects aren't usually those practiced by religious conservatives in this country, which is why it's always assumed that I'm an atheist when I condemn them.
     
  5. Silence
    Offline

    Silence wanna lick?

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    3,820
    Thanks Received:
    456
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    FL
    Ratings:
    +457
    I think I need to do more dancing...I'm not having nearly enough pre-marital sex :eusa_whistle:

    as for the parents, I think they should be charged. They have a legal and moral responsibilty to ensure the health and safety of their child and this isn't the 1700 anymore, there is no need to rely "on prayer" for healing...that's why God made medicine... He's busy doing other shit, he can't get to everyone.
     
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2008
  6. Agnapostate
    Offline

    Agnapostate BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2008
    Messages:
    6,860
    Thanks Received:
    344
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    The Quake State
    Ratings:
    +344
    "Pre-martial" sex? Sounds violent! :eek:
     
  7. Silence
    Offline

    Silence wanna lick?

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    3,820
    Thanks Received:
    456
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    FL
    Ratings:
    +457
    :lol: spelling errors can be amusing huh? :tongue:
     
  8. del
    Offline

    del BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Messages:
    45,052
    Thanks Received:
    9,830
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +9,885
    ned beatty, wyoming.
    priceless.

    gonna play some banjo for us?
    :rofl:
     
  9. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,427
    Thanks Received:
    5,598
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,617
    There's no way to come down on this that doesn't violate some cherished principle or the other.

    On one hand few of us wants the government to start deciding which of our religious beliefs is okay.

    On the other hand, none of us wants to allow every goofy religious belief or practice to get a pass, either.

    We do NOT have complete freedom of religion, folks, and we never will.

    It would not be possible to actually have complete freedom of religion, because there's always some religion out there waiting to make something most of us think is or should be a CRIME part of their religious practice.

    Remember folks, one man's deeply held religious belief is another man's psychotic delusion.

     
  10. KittenKoder
    Offline

    KittenKoder Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Messages:
    23,281
    Thanks Received:
    1,711
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Ratings:
    +1,714
    That is a good point, but a good place to start is: when the belief physically causes harm to another person it should be outlawed just to protect the other person, if the harm is only done to the one choosing to follow the belief, let them have at it.
     

Share This Page