Failure of our liberal unconstitutional big government

[Truthmatters]

Nixon actually started the drug war and had NATO have the members sign a treaty on the illegalization of drugs and their use. dems and GOP members have supported it ever since. There are some presidents that have intesified the war with harsher sentences for the crime. reagan was such a man. I did not like Clinton and his goal of a million man police force. The feds subsidised the cops to the point that they are a large receiver of welfare to operate cost free to the states. It is unecessary. It is a failed policy which has lasted 40 years to long.

And its unconsitutional, no one has the right to tell me what to put in my body as long as i dont bother them, and

if i bother them arrest me for bothering them, the drugs are an excuse and a medical issue.

The war on drugs started long before Nixon, any attempt by nixon to be in the middle dint do anyone any favours. Rhinos try to please liberals, never works, thats why they should get the boot.

In reality it should be called the War on Blacks, because for the longest time the police would let a white kid go, while arresting the black kid, ruining whos life forever? And saving the other?

No wonder the hood is such a mess after thats been going on for so long.

And the suburbs arnt any better, bunch of drug addled liberals never accountable, oh my kid has ADD, give him speed please Mr. Educator, oh boy.so you claim that the children abusing drugs in the burbs are all liberals? Its not the educator who gives the kid drugs.

You people are doomed, might as well just be ready for your next economic system that rules your everyday life:



USA past- Capitalism

USA present- Socialism

exU SA's future- Darwinism

"Rhinos try to please liberals, never works, thats why they should get the boot."


except for the line above you made some sense for a little while.

 

[Truthmatters]

all they had to do was put a bell on the cat

 

[konradv]

Where's the cite? We get your interpretation of what happened, but no first hand source? Why? You say we shouldn't trust the government and the media, but then give us no reason to trust you either.

Like a typical liberal, you display how lazy you are. The entire story was copied and pasted. Take any sentence, Google it, and you will see the story for yourself.

Damn you liberals are so fucking lazy, you can't even do your own research how. You even want Conservatives to come type on your keyboards for you.

Lazy? Who neglected to give us the cite in the first place? Take some personal responsibility or is that "just for the opther guy"?!?!

 

[Sallow]

the 55 mph national speed limit put into effect by Nixon in 1973?

And he started the EPA and OSHA

and liberals still hate his guts

what can we learn from this?

Many people hated Nixon because of his actions, his lying and his paranoia. He proved that he was a guy willing to do anything to get into the limelight after the Alger Hiss incident.

Nixon escalated the war in Vietnam..probably resulting in at least a million more deaths. That..and he secretly bombed two nations, Laos and Cambodia. He also initially supported the Khmer Rouge and was such a Psychopath..that he had to be cautioned by Kissinger (another sociopath) that blowing the dykes and killing 250K in one day would not be a good thing to do.

 

[Full-Auto]

Where's the cite? We get your interpretation of what happened, but no first hand source? Why? You say we shouldn't trust the government and the media, but then give us no reason to trust you either.

Like a typical liberal, you display how lazy you are. The entire story was copied and pasted. Take any sentence, Google it, and you will see the story for yourself.

Damn you liberals are so fucking lazy, you can't even do your own research how. You even want Conservatives to come type on your keyboards for you.

Lazy? Who neglected to give us the cite in the first place? Take some personal responsibility or is that "just for the opther guy"?!?!

LOL BUT BUT BUT

I did an immediate search............ Guess what. It was the very first story.

Quit being lazy.

 

[Douger]

More proof that ALL cops, lawmakers and military meatheads should be immediately exterminated. These people aren't smart enough to live on earth.
"Just doing my job ma'am". BOOOOM

 

[konradv]

Like a typical liberal, you display how lazy you are. The entire story was copied and pasted. Take any sentence, Google it, and you will see the story for yourself.

Damn you liberals are so fucking lazy, you can't even do your own research how. You even want Conservatives to come type on your keyboards for you.

Lazy? Who neglected to give us the cite in the first place? Take some personal responsibility or is that "just for the opther guy"?!?!

LOL BUT BUT BUT

I did an immediate search............ Guess what. It was the very first story.

Quit being lazy.

Good for you. We all know how to search. It's just that some of us have respect for our fellow board members. There are times when the article one finds and the article cited, aren't the same. It elimates confusion, if we all know what we're talking about. Also, why should we all search and waste our cumulative time, when the OP could have simply C&Ped the link in the first place?

 

[BoycottTheday]

you are confused on the facts

I was there, tell me again i was confused,

im sure if i told you real hippies in the 60's never wore anything tie-died

you wouldnt believe me either.

 

[auditor0007]

Where's the cite? We get your interpretation of what happened, but no first hand source? Why? You say we shouldn't trust the government and the media, but then give us no reason to trust you either.

Like a typical liberal, you display how lazy you are. The entire story was copied and pasted. Take any sentence, Google it, and you will see the story for yourself.

Damn you liberals are so fucking lazy, you can't even do your own research how. You even want Conservatives to come type on your keyboards for you.

Well, I'm not lazy. I guess that is why I found the truth about this story. But unlike most, I actually looked for a reputable news source. Like most stories that seem to be utterly unbelievable, there is usually more to what we hear initially.

Anyway, here is a link for you that will give you the entire story and the final outcome.

http://www.wusa9.com/news/article/161065/158/Woodpecker-Saving-Daughter-Costs-Mom-500

If you don't want to read through to the end, here is the update:

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service issued this statement at around 12:30 p.m. Tuesday, August 2nd:

"On June 13, a special agent with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service observed a woman carrying a cage that contained a woodpecker at a home improvement store in Fredericksburg Virg.

As possession of a bird may potentially violate the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act, the agent initiated an inquiry to determine whether a potential violation had occurred.

Upon speaking with the subject, later identified as Alison Capo, on June 27, the agent determined that no further action was warranted. A citation that had been previously drafted by the agent was cancelled on June 28.

Unfortunately, the citation was processed unintentionally despite our office's request to cancel the ticket. The Service has contacted Ms. Capo to express our regret. The Service is also sending Ms. Capo a formal letter explain the clerical error and confirming that ticket should never have been issued.

This misunderstanding was the result of a Service inquiry into possible violations of federal wildlife law. In particular the Service is responsible for the protection of all federally listed migratory birds. The Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries did not participate in the inquiry."

 

[Full-Auto]

Lazy? Who neglected to give us the cite in the first place? Take some personal responsibility or is that "just for the opther guy"?!?!

LOL BUT BUT BUT

I did an immediate search............ Guess what. It was the very first story.

Quit being lazy.

Good for you. We all know how to search. It's just that some of us have respect for our fellow board members. There are times when the article one finds and the article cited, aren't the same. It elimates confusion, if we all know what we're talking about. Also, why should we all search and waste our cumulative time, when the OP could have simply C&Ped the link in the first place?

Fair enough. Thats where you discuss the article you found differs from the OP,

I find the need for others do do my work, because I dont feel like it. Disgusting.

One of the primary reason I can never side with the left.

 

[auditor0007]

Where's the cite? We get your interpretation of what happened, but no first hand source? Why? You say we shouldn't trust the government and the media, but then give us no reason to trust you either.

Like a typical liberal, you display how lazy you are. The entire story was copied and pasted. Take any sentence, Google it, and you will see the story for yourself.

Damn you liberals are so fucking lazy, you can't even do your own research how. You even want Conservatives to come type on your keyboards for you.

Oh, and by the way, there are rules on this site. You have to provide a source when you copy and paste a story. Apparently, you are either too lazy to follow the rules, or you are too dumb to understand that you might be breaking copyright law by not doing so.

This is directly from the USMB Rules and Guidelines:

Copyright Guidelines:
Copyright infringement is illegal. USmessageboard.com will enforce the law. Never post an article in its entirety. When posting copyrighted material, please use small sections or link to the article. When posting copyrighted material you MUST give credit to the author in your post. You are responsible for including links/credit, regardless of how you originally came across the material. Link Each Copy and Paste.

 

[midcan5]

Amazes me that 'liberal' is the modern devil, I see them everywhere and talk to them, but they are only bad when I read a conservative? It must be that like all weak people, history has lots of examples, conservatives do nothing good but they must have a scapegoat. Weak people are so boring and such whiners. But then I think of the guy who created big government, Ronald Reagan, and I wonder if this is not a twilight zone episode. But Ronnie sounds lots like W too? Must be a twilight zone episode.

'Ronald Reagan Record'

'Increased Spending 80%
Increased Debt 180%
Decreased Carter Record Job Creation By 24%
Initiated Our Involvement In Four Foreign Conflicts
Here Is Comparison On Success'

'A vote for a Conservative is a vote for Less Success.
A vote to reduce the Standard of Living for all Americans.'

Recall 1920’s and Wall Street under Conservative control?
Recall 2000-2008 and Wall Street under Conservative control?

Want more of those years? It will take many years to recover.'

Listen To Ronald Reagan Side With The Democrats On The Debt Ceiling

 

[konradv]

LOL BUT BUT BUT

I did an immediate search............ Guess what. It was the very first story.

Quit being lazy.

Good for you. We all know how to search. It's just that some of us have respect for our fellow board members. There are times when the article one finds and the article cited, aren't the same. It elimates confusion, if we all know what we're talking about. Also, why should we all search and waste our cumulative time, when the OP could have simply C&Ped the link in the first place?

Fair enough. Thats where you discuss the article you found differs from the OP,

I find the need for others do do my work, because I dont feel like it. Disgusting.

One of the primary reason I can never side with the left.

It's the OP's responsibility to make sure all references to cited articles are included. How can we discuss the article I found vs. the article you found, if you don't include a cite? That just doesn't make sense. I'm not just going to go by the OP's characterization of what the article was about. I'm not one of the O'Limbeck sheeple.

 

[Truthmatters]

you are confused on the facts

I was there, tell me again i was confused,

im sure if i told you real hippies in the 60's never wore anything tie-died

you wouldnt believe me either.

Im 53 years old and was there also and had 5 older siblings.

Yes people did wear tie died clothes

 

[Vanquish]

The OP blames liberals for the wildlife law and the misapplication of it.

A few questions:
1. Who passed the law? Were any of them conservative?
2. Who misapplied the law? Were any of them conservative?
3. Are you saying that protection and conservation are only liberal values?

You really don't think about what you post, do you? Why the lib vs conseravtive blame game? Is that really all this board is about?

 

[AmericanFirst]

it can be reassesed by the courts, I want to know who alerted the state trooper?

Probably some socialist liberal environmentalist gay guy.

 

[BoycottTheday]

Not real hippies, and dead heads arnt hippes, they are just dead in the heads who liked crappy music.

 

[P@triot]

Where's the cite? We get your interpretation of what happened, but no first hand source? Why? You say we shouldn't trust the government and the media, but then give us no reason to trust you either.

Like a typical liberal, you display how lazy you are. The entire story was copied and pasted. Take any sentence, Google it, and you will see the story for yourself.

Damn you liberals are so fucking lazy, you can't even do your own research how. You even want Conservatives to come type on your keyboards for you.

Well, I'm not lazy. I guess that is why I found the truth about this story. But unlike most, I actually looked for a reputable news source. Like most stories that seem to be utterly unbelievable, there is usually more to what we hear initially.

Anyway, here is a link for you that will give you the entire story and the final outcome.

Woodpecker-Saving Girl's Mother Gets Fined $500 | wusa9.com

If you don't want to read through to the end, here is the update:

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service issued this statement at around 12:30 p.m. Tuesday, August 2nd:

"On June 13, a special agent with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service observed a woman carrying a cage that contained a woodpecker at a home improvement store in Fredericksburg Virg.

As possession of a bird may potentially violate the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act, the agent initiated an inquiry to determine whether a potential violation had occurred.

Upon speaking with the subject, later identified as Alison Capo, on June 27, the agent determined that no further action was warranted. A citation that had been previously drafted by the agent was cancelled on June 28.

Unfortunately, the citation was processed unintentionally despite our office's request to cancel the ticket. The Service has contacted Ms. Capo to express our regret. The Service is also sending Ms. Capo a formal letter explain the clerical error and confirming that ticket should never have been issued.

This misunderstanding was the result of a Service inquiry into possible violations of federal wildlife law. In particular the Service is responsible for the protection of all federally listed migratory birds. The Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries did not participate in the inquiry."

And you believe that?!?!? LMAO!!!

Man, you liberals are such tools! Let me explain to you what that PR statement actually said:

Now that the local news is knocking on our door (and we refuse to answer) and now that this story has made national news and we've been exposed for the fascist big government Nazi's that we are, we must immediately back peddle, recind the citation, and create a PR story that the tools on the left will actually buy into.

Dude - the local news station has video of the story posted, which included an interview with the family and which contradicts the entire version of this story you are pushing in hopes of keeping what little big controlling government supporters you have left.

FACT: the video explicitly states that the exact same woman from the Department of Fish & Wildlife showed up at the door with the state trooper (forward to the 1:21 mark in the video) to serve the citation.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/mom-slapped-with-fine-after-daughter-saves-baby-bird/

So much for their PR propaganda! How ignorant does one have to be to buy into that absurd "citation was already processed" story? I now understand why the left believes in the policies they do - they are so weak minded, they fall victim to the "jedi-mind-trick".

"These are not the droids you are looking for. Move along". LMAO!!!

 

[BoycottTheday]

Well, i listened to both sides, butt

i still think she's to young to be playing with peckers...

 

[P@triot]

Where's the cite? We get your interpretation of what happened, but no first hand source? Why? You say we shouldn't trust the government and the media, but then give us no reason to trust you either.

Like a typical liberal, you display how lazy you are. The entire story was copied and pasted. Take any sentence, Google it, and you will see the story for yourself.

Damn you liberals are so fucking lazy, you can't even do your own research how. You even want Conservatives to come type on your keyboards for you.

Oh, and by the way, there are rules on this site. You have to provide a source when you copy and paste a story. Apparently, you are either too lazy to follow the rules, or you are too dumb to understand that you might be breaking copyright law by not doing so.

This is directly from the USMB Rules and Guidelines:

Copyright Guidelines:
Copyright infringement is illegal. USmessageboard.com will enforce the law. Never post an article in its entirety. When posting copyrighted material, please use small sections or link to the article. When posting copyrighted material you MUST give credit to the author in your post. You are responsible for including links/credit, regardless of how you originally came across the material. Link Each Copy and Paste.

Well you must be too dumb to understand copyright laws. I'm not selling work as my own, nor am I making money off of this in any capacity. I read a story and I posted a message about that story.

Are you infringing on copyright laws when you're at home singing your favorite song? No, you're not, you stupid tool. Even though you didn't create the song, even though you didn't write the song, you're not violating copyright laws because you're not selling cd's of you singing the songs. I know you dumbocrats want a nanny state, but this is not a nanny state just yet. We still have the right to discuss news stories we saw or sing a song we didn't create.