Fact-Checking Wisconsin

Discussion in 'Politics' started by JBeukema, Feb 21, 2011.

  1. JBeukema
    Offline

    JBeukema BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2009
    Messages:
    25,613
    Thanks Received:
    1,703
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    everywhere and nowhere
    Ratings:
    +1,705
  2. Agit8r
    Offline

    Agit8r Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2010
    Messages:
    9,142
    Thanks Received:
    1,052
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,174
    The thing is that the Union has agreed to these sacrifices

    so long as they retain the right to renegotiate when the situation improves

    what could be more reasonable?
     
  3. liebuster
    Offline

    liebuster VIP Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    Messages:
    637
    Thanks Received:
    100
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Ratings:
    +100

    When the "renegotiating" resumes it will ultimately lead to the same place WI is in now.
     
  4. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,428
    Thanks Received:
    8,397
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +8,409
    There is nothing reasonable about having gubmint bureaucrat unions spending huge amounts of taxpayer money to get politicians elected, who will in turn decide which union demands are deemed "reasonable".

    In the real world, we refer to such things as collusion, anti-trust and conflict of interest.
     
    Last edited: Feb 21, 2011
  5. Mr.Fitnah
    Offline

    Mr.Fitnah Dreamcrusher

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2009
    Messages:
    14,480
    Thanks Received:
    2,673
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Paradise.
    Ratings:
    +2,673
    Nah it will be different, see they are they new kind of parasite .
     
  6. shintao
    Offline

    shintao Take Down ~ Tap Out

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2010
    Messages:
    7,231
    Thanks Received:
    320
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +339
    We do want to treat them like private sector workers don't we?:eusa_angel:
     
  7. liebuster
    Offline

    liebuster VIP Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    Messages:
    637
    Thanks Received:
    100
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Ratings:
    +100
    Oh my, of course not. We would never want those teachers to be stressed out all day by the possibility of them getting fired for being crappy teachers. We want them to have a free pass to fuck up our little child's mind with their political indoctrination passed down to them from their daily injection of how to think from the union.
     
  8. JFK_USA
    Offline

    JFK_USA Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    2,606
    Thanks Received:
    412
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Ratings:
    +725
    But its totally okay for companies to spend my money towards republican candidates?

    Either none are allowed or both are allowed. Can't have it both ways.
     
  9. liebuster
    Offline

    liebuster VIP Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    Messages:
    637
    Thanks Received:
    100
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Ratings:
    +100
    How is a company's money, your money?

    Edited to add:

    I don't necessarily agree with the premise that these unions are getting taxpayer money. They are getting the teachers money.
     
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2011
  10. DiveCon
    Offline

    DiveCon gone

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    48,025
    Thanks Received:
    3,387
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +3,387
    it wont be your money
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

liebuster sott