Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Because Mitt is on the record saying that he didn't.Is Bain all you have and noone cares how sad is THAT? So what the guys made millions doing business, OMG he increased profits by outsourcing, because American unions jacked up labor costs.....I dont know if he did do these things, but even if he did....HINT NOONE CARES...because liberals that are rich DO THE SAME SHIT...you lose!
The American people do not like to be lied to.
Which is a different issue. Try to keep up.Yeah, they were pretty clear that he was trying to negotiate his retirement and make all the formal arrangements to transition him out of the company.
Not really a secret.
Reading comprehension is essential.FACT CHECK: Romney met Bain partners after exit
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has said he had no active role in Bain Capital, the private equity firm he founded, after he exited in February 1999 to take over Salt Lake City's Winter Olympics bid. But according to Bain associates and others familiar with Romney's actions at the time, he stayed in regular contact with his partners over the following months, tending to his partnership interests and negotiating his separation from the company.
Those familiar with Romney's discussions with his Bain partners said the contacts included several meetings in Boston, the company's home base, but were limited to matters that did not affect the firm's investments or other management decisions. Yet Romney continued to oversee his partnership stakes even as he disengaged from the firm, personally signing or approving a series of corporate and legal documents through the spring of 2001, according to financial reports reviewed by The Associated Press.
The details of Romney's contacts with his Bain partners between his 1999 departure and his separation from the company in mid-2001 could show how involved he was - either as CEO or passive investor - in several multimillion-dollar investment deals, bankruptcies and a spate of layoffs and overseas job shifts at Bain-owned companies that reportedly occurred during that span. Romney's role became a campaign issue in recent weeks because corporate records from the time showed his interests in some of those deals - despite his insistence that he gave up any decision-making authority once he left Bain.
*snip*
Which is a different issue. Try to keep up.Yeah, they were pretty clear that he was trying to negotiate his retirement and make all the formal arrangements to transition him out of the company.
Not really a secret.
Which is a different issue. Try to keep up.Yeah, they were pretty clear that he was trying to negotiate his retirement and make all the formal arrangements to transition him out of the company.
Not really a secret.
Well, no, it's not a different issue. Separation from a company as large as Bain on short notice takes time. Yes he will be signing documents. I wish some knew how to comprehend the SEC report.
His claim was he was not hands on, did not make any decisions...right?
FACT CHECK: Romney met Bain partners after exit
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has said he had no active role in Bain Capital, the private equity firm he founded, after he exited in February 1999 to take over Salt Lake City's Winter Olympics bid. But according to Bain associates and others familiar with Romney's actions at the time, he stayed in regular contact with his partners over the following months, tending to his partnership interests and negotiating his separation from the company.
Those familiar with Romney's discussions with his Bain partners said the contacts included several meetings in Boston, the company's home base, but were limited to matters that did not affect the firm's investments or other management decisions. Yet Romney continued to oversee his partnership stakes even as he disengaged from the firm, personally signing or approving a series of corporate and legal documents through the spring of 2001, according to financial reports reviewed by The Associated Press.
The details of Romney's contacts with his Bain partners between his 1999 departure and his separation from the company in mid-2001 could show how involved he was - either as CEO or passive investor - in several multimillion-dollar investment deals, bankruptcies and a spate of layoffs and overseas job shifts at Bain-owned companies that reportedly occurred during that span. Romney's role became a campaign issue in recent weeks because corporate records from the time showed his interests in some of those deals - despite his insistence that he gave up any decision-making authority once he left Bain.
*snip*
Which is a different issue. Try to keep up.Yeah, they were pretty clear that he was trying to negotiate his retirement and make all the formal arrangements to transition him out of the company.
Not really a secret.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFFEgtyjV18]Mitt Romney defends his Bain departure date - YouTube[/ame]
No role whatsoever..
Reading comprehension is essential.FACT CHECK: Romney met Bain partners after exit
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has said he had no active role in Bain Capital, the private equity firm he founded, after he exited in February 1999 to take over Salt Lake City's Winter Olympics bid. But according to Bain associates and others familiar with Romney's actions at the time, he stayed in regular contact with his partners over the following months, tending to his partnership interests and negotiating his separation from the company.
Those familiar with Romney's discussions with his Bain partners said the contacts included several meetings in Boston, the company's home base, but were limited to matters that did not affect the firm's investments or other management decisions. Yet Romney continued to oversee his partnership stakes even as he disengaged from the firm, personally signing or approving a series of corporate and legal documents through the spring of 2001, according to financial reports reviewed by The Associated Press.
The details of Romney's contacts with his Bain partners between his 1999 departure and his separation from the company in mid-2001 could show how involved he was - either as CEO or passive investor - in several multimillion-dollar investment deals, bankruptcies and a spate of layoffs and overseas job shifts at Bain-owned companies that reportedly occurred during that span. Romney's role became a campaign issue in recent weeks because corporate records from the time showed his interests in some of those deals - despite his insistence that he gave up any decision-making authority once he left Bain.
*snip*
Yes, the poster should have read his own link...
Not does show, could show .... nothing concrete ... could show ... might be .... could be ... we don't know we're just winging it here. It took several years to negotiate and unwind Romney from Bain, as these things tend to go like that. This article states why he was still 'involved' at Bain but since they can't manipulate those facts to make Romney look bad, they throw in the 'could show we're just supposin' and coming up with our own theories ... hopin' no one will notice that we've got bupkis and are basically just seeing what will stick'.
It sure is!
Not does show, could show .... nothing concrete ... could show ... might be .... could be ... we don't know we're just winging it here. It took several years to negotiate and unwind Romney from Bain, as these things tend to go like that. This article states why he was still 'involved' at Bain but since they can't manipulate those facts to make Romney look bad, they throw in the 'could show we're just supposin' and coming up with our own theories ... hopin' no one will notice that we've got bupkis and are basically just seeing what will stick'.
That's the bull he's floating. And it's trying to thread the needle with a camel.
He should really have just not gone with this at all..and taken the lumps.
Which is a different issue. Try to keep up.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFFEgtyjV18]Mitt Romney defends his Bain departure date - YouTube[/ame]
No role whatsoever..
and so far there is nothing in that article or anywhere else that shows otherwise.
Playing a role in negotiating your departure is not playing a role in decisions as it pertains to day to day operations.
Pay attention to how your candidtae ius continually lying to you and stop trying to prove that the other candidate an equally pathological liar.
Which is a different issue. Try to keep up.
Well, no, it's not a different issue. Separation from a company as large as Bain on short notice takes time. Yes he will be signing documents. I wish some knew how to comprehend the SEC report.
His claim was he was not hands on, did not make any decisions...right?
No it doesn't.
Pathological liar would be someone who said he didn't attend ANY meetings at Bain.
It really is simple. He filed a document with the SEC that identified him as the person responsible for anything that Bain did from 1999 - 2002. And he met with partners.
2 + 2 really does equal 4.
Not does show, could show .... nothing concrete ... could show ... might be .... could be ... we don't know we're just winging it here. It took several years to negotiate and unwind Romney from Bain, as these things tend to go like that. This article states why he was still 'involved' at Bain but since they can't manipulate those facts to make Romney look bad, they throw in the 'could show we're just supposin' and coming up with our own theories ... hopin' no one will notice that we've got bupkis and are basically just seeing what will stick'.
Reading comprehension is essential.FACT CHECK: Romney met Bain partners after exit
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has said he had no active role in Bain Capital, the private equity firm he founded, after he exited in February 1999 to take over Salt Lake City's Winter Olympics bid. But according to Bain associates and others familiar with Romney's actions at the time, he stayed in regular contact with his partners over the following months, tending to his partnership interests and negotiating his separation from the company.
Those familiar with Romney's discussions with his Bain partners said the contacts included several meetings in Boston, the company's home base, but were limited to matters that did not affect the firm's investments or other management decisions. Yet Romney continued to oversee his partnership stakes even as he disengaged from the firm, personally signing or approving a series of corporate and legal documents through the spring of 2001, according to financial reports reviewed by The Associated Press.
The details of Romney's contacts with his Bain partners between his 1999 departure and his separation from the company in mid-2001 could show how involved he was - either as CEO or passive investor - in several multimillion-dollar investment deals, bankruptcies and a spate of layoffs and overseas job shifts at Bain-owned companies that reportedly occurred during that span. Romney's role became a campaign issue in recent weeks because corporate records from the time showed his interests in some of those deals - despite his insistence that he gave up any decision-making authority once he left Bain.
*snip*
This flies in the face of Romney's assertion.
Along with the SEC documents.
How many lies does this guy get to tell?
Because Mitt is on the record saying that he didn't.Is Bain all you have and noone cares how sad is THAT? So what the guys made millions doing business, OMG he increased profits by outsourcing, because American unions jacked up labor costs.....I dont know if he did do these things, but even if he did....HINT NOONE CARES...because liberals that are rich DO THE SAME SHIT...you lose!
The American people do not like to be lied to.
Didnt know the man. He was just a man in the neighborhood.
Did not know my mentor had those sentiments
Close GITMO
Read each bill with a scalpel
Cut the dreficit in half
Seems the American people are just fine with it when they are lied to
Because Mitt is on the record saying that he didn't.
The American people do not like to be lied to.
Didnt know the man. He was just a man in the neighborhood.
Did not know my mentor had those sentiments
Are there documents being hidden that prove President Obama (praise be unto Him!) lied about this? No.
Close GITMO
Read each bill with a scalpel
Cut the dreficit in half
Seems the American people are just fine with it when they are lied to
Partisan bullshit. But you knew that, or should have.
Which is a different issue. Try to keep up.Yeah, they were pretty clear that he was trying to negotiate his retirement and make all the formal arrangements to transition him out of the company.
Not really a secret.
Well, no, it's not a different issue. Separation from a company as large as Bain on short notice takes time. Yes he will be signing documents. I wish some knew how to comprehend the SEC report.
His claim was he was not hands on, did not make any decisions...right?
Pathological liar would be someone who said he didn't attend ANY meetings at Bain.
It really is simple. He filed a document with the SEC that identified him as the person responsible for anything that Bain did from 1999 - 2002. And he met with partners.
2 + 2 really does equal 4.
Prove it. That is not what the SEC doc states.
Give me an exact break down of what the SEC doc said, in 25 words or less.
It really is that simple!
Well, no, it's not a different issue. Separation from a company as large as Bain on short notice takes time. Yes he will be signing documents. I wish some knew how to comprehend the SEC report.
His claim was he was not hands on, did not make any decisions...right?
No it doesn't.
No it doesn't what?
