Extreme weather, 2011

[CrusaderFrank]

Some Of The Disasters Of 2011 - YouTube

Earthquakes are now extreme weather?

OR do you think these earthquakes are caused by man?

That was a compodium of disasters for 2011. That would not be complete without including earthquakes. No, that is not caused by weather, although weather can certainly render the cleanup afterwards miserable.

The number and intensity of the weather events is unmatched in our written history. And it is a worldwide phenomonem.

Unmatched in our written history...wowzers!

 

[RollingThunder]

Ahem . . . . . . See ice in the arctic has been increasing since 2007. Curious that your video was made in 2007. At least, it only shows data up to 2007.

Ahem, dumb fuck, this year, depending on the source,it was slightly more, or slightly less than in 2007. And the volume was less.

PIOMAS September 2011 (volume record lower still) - Arctic Sea Ice

Here's some more honest data, dumb fuck, rather than some warmist government toady data.

"More honest data"???? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL....you are such a silly brainwashed retarded little turd-head, britbrat....you actually seem to imagine that your denier cult blog sources are "more honest" than the widely verified published scientific data. LOLOLOL. You have no idea what is going on, you poor deluded nitwit.

Note the increase in area after 2007.

You are such a gullible idiot. A distorted graph from a denier cult blog called "noconsensus" is your 'evidence' that the scientists are lying??? LOLOLOL

Here's the actual 'honest' data from a reputable source.

Monthly Deviations of Sea Ice Area in the Arctic from merged SMMR and SSMI Data (NORSEX algorithm) (Copyright: NERSC and NIERSC)
Arctic Regional Ocean Observing System

(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.)

You might want to read the article that goes with it:

Arctic Sea Ice Increases at Record Rate | Watts Up With That?

Your stupid gullibility just never ends, does it. Watts is a fraud and a tool of the fossil fuel industry. Besides that, he is a clueless cretin, just like you. Maybe that's why you like him. 'Birds of a feather' and all that.

Since you obviously have the attention span of a fruit-fly, britbrat, I doubt you'll be able to watch (or comprehend) this video demolishing Watts' nonsense and lies, but others who have some appreciation for the truth will watch and notice the reputability of the sources used.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wbzK4v7GsM&feature=player_embedded]Watts Up with Sea Ice? - YouTube[/ame]

 

[skookerasbil]

the weather now is not more extreme than in the past. it is probably more stable than most times but that is just a fluke. it is only because TV shows us what is happening everywhere in the world, over and over again, that we think weather and disasters are more common.

As Ive always said........the scheme by the alarmists was brilliant from the start. Anticipate the novelty of the 24 hour news cycle and the daily coverage of every single weather anomoly in every corner of the globe.........AND knowing that the huge majority of those who bring us the news are part of the annointed elitists! Of fcukking course its going to be on the news every night!!! Psychologists refer to it as classical conditioning..........its a cant miss method. Too........they know most people will buy a bag of dog doo for $1,000 a pop if its packaged up just right. Its brilliant.............

And the most amazing thing..........people still fall hook, line and stinker for these "computer models" wthout ever questioning their humongous levels of variability. They bank on.............correctly, I might add........that the majority wont look at the detail. Heres a perfect example...........

 

[skookerasbil]

You always...........invariably...........hear the environmental radicals referring to "computer models" with respect to their warming beliefs........as if these computer models had some high degree of certainty.

LAUGH MY BALLS OFF


Here is a typical hurricane computer model of potential tracks of the storm.

No elaboration necessary

 

[skookerasbil]

 

[RollingThunder]

LOLOLOL....and the kooky forum resident retard once again mutters pointless nonsense about matters of science that are far beyond his very limited comprehension.....too worthless to bother responding to except with a good laugh....as usual.....

 

[skookerasbil]

LOLOLOL....and the kooky forum resident retard once again mutters pointless nonsense about matters of science that are far beyond his very limited comprehension.....too worthless to bother responding to except with a good laugh....as usual.....

but still winning s0n!!!!


Your side?

Not so much!!!!


Oh...........ps asshole..........been waiting now for 4 months for that link? Still waiting!! The link that shows us all how your shit matters? ( ie: that the "consensus" is influencing public policy in ANY way!!!).

So.........wheres all the legislation...............dickhead???

 

[whitehall]

You can't argue with a religious movement like global warming. You gotta have faith. When we have a severe winter they blame global warming and when we have a relatively mild winter they blame...you guessed it.

 

[daveman]

If you guys had facts on your side, you wouldn't have to rely on emotionalism.

 

[Old Rocks]

Indeed, it may well be.

Home

 

[daveman]

Indeed, it may well be.

Home

"If you guys had facts on your side, you wouldn't have to rely on emotionalism."

 

[bripat9643]

Indeed, it may well be.

Home

"If you guys had facts on your side, you wouldn't have to rely on emotionalism."

Almost all their arguments are logical fallacies. The biggest of all is the one about "consensus." Science isn't consensus and consensus isn't science.

Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What are relevant are reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it's science, it isn't consensus. Period.

- Michael Chrichton -

 

[daveman]

Indeed, it may well be.

Home

"If you guys had facts on your side, you wouldn't have to rely on emotionalism."

Almost all their arguments are logical fallacies. The biggest of all is the one about "consensus." Science isn't consensus and consensus isn't science.

Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What are relevant are reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it's science, it isn't consensus. Period.

- Michael Chrichton -

"Consensus is the business of politics."

And AGW is politics. Not science.

 

[Old Rocks]

Damn politics melting the polar caps and glaciers. Making every decade warmer than the last, worldwide. Warming the ocean clathrates and making them outgas. Damn politics.

 

[Old Rocks]

Home

"The extent of Arctic sea ice in 2011 was the second lowest on record, and its volume was a new record low of 4200 cubic kilometres, surpassing the record of 4580 cubic kilometres set in 2010.

"Arctic peatlands, thawing permafrost and venting East Siberian shelf methane hydrates are emitting more methane to the atmosphere.

"Atmospheric methane, having increased two and a half times since industrialization, is on the increase again since 2007 and scientists say this increase is due to global warming feedback processes, mainly in the Arctic."

 

[bripat9643]

Damn politics melting the polar caps and glaciers. Making every decade warmer than the last, worldwide. Warming the ocean clathrates and making them outgas. Damn politics.

Those are political claims, not scientific facts.