Exclusive: Death sentence on israelis

[P F Tinmore]

(Article by Nadav Haetzni, "Ma'ariv", Dec 3, 1998, "Shabbat Supplement," pp. 2-3)

Not only has a Palestinian land law come into being, but a Palestinian law on weapons is also now in effect, according to which it is permissible for the Palestinian Authority to manufacture weapons and accord its citizens the right to bear arms.

According to the new law, revealed here for the first time, any Israeli citizen or institution, certainly any settler or the IDF, holding land in "Palestine", is harming Palestinian "national security". Together with this, any Palestinian who aids, in any way, the acquisition or possession of land by an Israeli -- is guilty of treason. The land will pass automatically to the treasury of the Palestinian state, and the judgment on the Israeli holding the land or the Palestinian selling it -- death.

The law, which, as far is known, has already passed through all the legislative processes, defines as "occupiers" the "Israeli occupying authority and its civil and military institutions, settlements and whomever is under their authority."

It states that "any actions conducted by or being conducted by the occupying authority (Israel) on Palestinian real estate are considered absolutely null and void." The law contains no definition of what Palestinian land is, so that according to the accepted Palestinian view, the law also applies to land in Tel Aviv, Acre and Haifa, and certainly that in Jerusalem and in Judea and Samaria."

The law also prohibits "all persons who are not Arab Palestinians, whether they are persons real or artificial, to possess any real estate in Palestine or to obtain any material right, by any reason of ownership ..." However, while regarding citizens of countries "with which there is reciprocity" the Palestinian "Council of Ministers" may permit the holding of real estate, a special article in the law states that regarding "occupiers," that is the government and citizens of Israel, the Council of Ministers has no authority to permit the holding of real estate. Such land would be confiscated immediately by the Palestinian authorities.

A Clear Threat to Israel On 6 July, the legal adviser to the IDF Central Command and the Civil Administration, Col. Shlomo Politis, wrote a letter to OC Central Command. He warned against another new Palestinian law which had just been legislated. This is the "Palestinian Firearms and Ammunition Law," which was approved in an order by Yasser Arafat this past May, and which received nearly no exposure.

The law permits the Palestinian Authority to manufacture weapons and to issue licenses to carry all sorts of weapons.

However, it seems that an even more severe aspect of the law is expressed in its second section, which deals with the manufacture and import of weapons.

EXCLUSIVE- DEATH SENTENCE ON ISRAELIS - 03-Dec-98

 

[Ropey]

Palestinian Law?

LMAO

First create a Palestine.

At the moment, it's not there. Just in your wishes and your apologist maps.

Main article: Palestinian right of return

Supporters of a Palestinian right of return argue that refugees, displaced persons, and all their descendants have a right to return and a right to property they left or were forced to leave in the former British Mandate of Palestine (currently Israel and Occupied Palestinian territories), as result of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War and the 1967 Six-Day war.[23] Article 11 of the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 194 (III) is often cited in support of this claim:

11. Resolves that the refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return and for loss of or damage to property which, under principles of international law or in equity, should be made good by the Governments or authorities responsible; Instructs the Conciliation Commission to facilitate the repatriation, resettlement and economic and social rehabilitation of the refugees and the payment of compensation, and to maintain close relations with the Director of the United Nations Relief for Palestine Refugees and, through him, with the appropriate organs and agencies of the United Nations;[24]

As a rebuttal to Resolution 194 being used in support, it is noted by opponents that General Assembly resolutions are legally non-binding and have no force as international law[/B][25] and that the rights of refugees are not inherited by their descendants. Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion also claimed that given recent history, refugees could not be trusted to live in peace with their neighbors. Opponents of a Palestinian right of return argue that there is no basis in international law for such a claim.[26] Although the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights claim that the right of return to one's own country is a human right, numerous scholars have interpreted this to mean citizens or nationals of the country.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_return

Not many left alive to return to what is not there. Soon none. Continue to create General Assembly non binding resolutions with the 57 Muslim countries in that assembly.

Means nothing. Never has, never will.

 

[P F Tinmore]

So, you are saying that the refugees are not citizens of Palestine.

That is an interesting opinion. The Palestinians say they are and they are the only ones who can make that determination.

 

[Ropey]

I am saying that there is no Palestine.

A right to return to what is not there.

(Pardon the double negative, used from emphasis of the inanity of the proposal that there is a Palestine or any Palestinians yet).