Excerpt: 'The Heart of Whiteness'

[Shogun]

maybe because they kept blacks in slavery, the majority of them in slavery that is?

The majority of blacks were too stupid, lazy, or ball-less to fight for liberty until the White Man gave them to go-ahead with the EP?

indeed. Notice how blacks didn't free themselves from slavery in America.. No.. THAT was a job for whites too.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

maybe because they kept blacks in slavery, the majority of them in slavery that is?

The majority of blacks were too stupid, lazy, or ball-less to fight for liberty until the White Man gave them to go-ahead with the EP?

African American Particiption in the Revolutionary War

now support your assertion, jackass.

 

[Shogun]

no.

Which question are you responding to?

the latter

praytel. I've compared them. Lets see you contrast them.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

maybe because they kept blacks in slavery, the majority of them in slavery that is?

The majority of blacks were too stupid, lazy, or ball-less to fight for liberty until the White Man gave them to go-ahead with the EP?

indeed. Notice how blacks didn't free themselves from slavery in America.. No.. THAT was a job for whites too.

You've already been refuted on this BS already.

 

[Shogun]

maybe because they kept blacks in slavery, the majority of them in slavery that is?

The majority of blacks were too stupid, lazy, or ball-less to fight for liberty until the White Man gave them to go-ahead with the EP?

African American Particiption in the Revolutionary War

now support your assertion, jackass.

a homestead personal webpage? whatsa matter? forgot your Geocities password?

 

[Shogun]

The majority of blacks were too stupid, lazy, or ball-less to fight for liberty until the White Man gave them to go-ahead with the EP?

indeed. Notice how blacks didn't free themselves from slavery in America.. No.. THAT was a job for whites too.

You've already been refuted on this BS already.

HA!

yea... because there are so many black versions of the Emancipation Proclimation in the Smithsonian!




face it, dude... were it not for whites then your black ass would STILL be on the farm.

 

[JBeukema]

now support your assertion, jackass.

When was the Great American Slave Revolt, where thousands of slave drivers were slain and Blacks fought for their freedom?

Wait, that never happened...


When was the Great Black Uprising, in which the Blacks gathered hoes, shovels, and any other weapons they could find, and marched from plantation to plantation, slaying the slave owners, freeing the slaves, and declaring the land to be a new sovereign territory of free blacks?

Wait, that never happened, wither...


When did the Blacks assemble en masse and violently resist capture wall across the south, killing any slavecatchers who entered the area?


Wait, they didn't...



When did the Blacks do shit?When White men told them to line up and fight- for the White man

 

[Bass v 2.0]

Without the unpaid slave labor of blacks, the economy of the country would not have been sufficient enough to sustain itself. Notice how every white founded country in the New World were all heavily dependent upon non-white agricultural labor to sustain themselves economically and to feed themselves. it should be noted that these enslaved blacks were already skilled artisans and agriculturalists *BEFORE* they were stolen from Africa.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

indeed. Notice how blacks didn't free themselves from slavery in America.. No.. THAT was a job for whites too.

You've already been refuted on this BS already.

HA!

yea... because there are so many black versions of the Emancipation Proclimation in the Smithsonian!




face it, dude... were it not for whites then your black ass would STILL be on the farm.

The Emancipation Proclamation did not free all blacks, you can read the document yourself jackass.

 

[del]

Which question are you responding to?

the latter

praytel. I've compared them. Lets see you contrast them.

to what end? there were blacks fighting in every battle from lexington and concord to yorktown. they are no less heirs to america than you and me.

you can surely wallow in your racism without my help.


perhaps you'd care to regale us with tales of the german founding fathers?

oops, they were mostly on the other side, weren't they?
sorry

 

[JBeukema]

Without the unpaid slave labor of blacks, the economy of the country would not have been sufficient enough to sustain itself.

1) true, perhaps of the south if they had gotten rid of the slaves and attempted to maintain the same economic system

2) The same goes for the mules and cattle that worked the fields. So, basically you're comparing blacks to farm animals

Notice how every white founded country in the New World were all heavily dependent upon non-white agricultural labor to sustain themselves economically and to feed themselves

Dependent? No. Made use of slaves to make things easier on themselves? yes.

it should be noted that these enslaved blacks were already skilled artisans and agriculturalists *BEFORE* they were stolen from Africa.

Stolen? they were sold by other blacks, you fool

 

[Bass v 2.0]

now support your assertion, jackass.

When was the Great American Slave Revolt, where thousands of slave drivers were slain and Blacks fought for their freedom?

Wait, that never happened...


When was the Great Black Uprising, in which the Blacks gathered hoes, shovels, and any other weapons they could find, and marched from plantation to plantation, slaying the slave owners, freeing the slaves, and declaring the land to be a new sovereign territory of free blacks?

Wait, that never happened, wither...


When did the Blacks assemble en masse and violently resist capture wall across the south, killing any slavecatchers who entered the area?


Wait, they didn't...



When did the Blacks do shit?When White men told them to line up and fight- for the White man

Blacks never rebelled and accepted their condition as slaves?


Slave Rebellions


Antebellum Slave Rebellions: Revolts and Confrontations in Antebellum America | Suite101.com

 

[Shogun]

Without the unpaid slave labor of blacks, the economy of the country would not have been sufficient enough to sustain itself. Notice how every white founded country in the New World were all heavily dependent upon non-white agricultural labor to sustain themselves economically and to feed themselves. it should be noted that these enslaved blacks were already skilled artisans and agriculturalists *BEFORE* they were stolen from Africa.

skilled artisans. GIVE ME A FUCKING BREAK.






You are entertaining if not as bright as a dingleberry, bass.


by all means, negro.. take your SKILLED ass back to Africa. No one wants you for cheap labor anymore. good riddance.

 

[JBeukema]

The Blacks never organized a large-scale war for their freedom. A few small-time revolts and a handful of persons among the entire masses do not constitute Nack uprisings, merely the battles of a few brave men

 

[Shogun]

the latter

praytel. I've compared them. Lets see you contrast them.

to what end? there were blacks fighting in every battle from lexington and concord to yorktown. they are no less heirs to america than you and me.

you can surely wallow in your racism without my help.


perhaps you'd care to regale us with tales of the german founding fathers?

oops, they were mostly on the other side, weren't they?
sorry

crying racist isn't an answer, del. You stated that Crispus can't be compared to King. I made MY point so lets see you make yours. Tell me, WHAT EXACTLY did he do besides take a bullet?



Notice, I don't argue that Germans are picked on and deserve affirmative action against meany english americans. Your capacity to flounder around like a hooked fish is more impressive than your ability to back up your earlier input. Indeed, calling Crispus an AMERICAN FOUNDING FATHER is so fucking retarded that I can probably guess why you'd choose to cry racist than support your assertion.

 

[Shogun]

You've already been refuted on this BS already.

HA!

yea... because there are so many black versions of the Emancipation Proclimation in the Smithsonian!




face it, dude... were it not for whites then your black ass would STILL be on the farm.

The Emancipation Proclamation did not free all blacks, you can read the document yourself jackass.

yea, dude.. not ONE single slave ever shed tears hearing that very document read because, you know, it effectively had NO impact on their existence or that of their children!

 

[Bass v 2.0]

Without the unpaid slave labor of blacks, the economy of the country would not have been sufficient enough to sustain itself.

1) true, perhaps of the south if they had gotten rid of the slaves and attempted to maintain the same economic system

2) The same goes for the mules and cattle that worked the fields. So, basically you're comparing blacks to farm animals

Mules and cattle don't know how to practice agriculture, neither did they introduce new crops to America.

Dependent? No. Made use of slaves to make things easier on themselves? yes.

Whites didn't teach black slaves agriculture and when they tried using other whites and or tried plating for themselves they failed.


Without the use of black slave agricultural labor the US would not have been able to sustain itself.

 

[Shogun]

now support your assertion, jackass.

When was the Great American Slave Revolt, where thousands of slave drivers were slain and Blacks fought for their freedom?

Wait, that never happened...


When was the Great Black Uprising, in which the Blacks gathered hoes, shovels, and any other weapons they could find, and marched from plantation to plantation, slaying the slave owners, freeing the slaves, and declaring the land to be a new sovereign territory of free blacks?

Wait, that never happened, wither...


When did the Blacks assemble en masse and violently resist capture wall across the south, killing any slavecatchers who entered the area?


Wait, they didn't...



When did the Blacks do shit?When White men told them to line up and fight- for the White man

Blacks never rebelled and accepted their condition as slaves?


Slave Rebellions


Antebellum Slave Rebellions: Revolts and Confrontations in Antebellum America | Suite101.com

and were summarily put fucking DOWN by white people. Now, where is your black fucking George Washington who freed slaves from the south, dude? Come on.. SURELY you can think of a name that isn't a white guy. SURELY.

 

[JBeukema]

Mules and cattle don't know how to practice agriculture, neither did they introduce new crops to America.

They do as they're told, just as the slaves did.

Without the use of black slave agricultural labor the US would not have been able to sustain itself.

right... because Whites didn't have farming back in Europe and we learned nothing about surviving in the New World from the natives

and were summarily put fucking DOWN by white people. Now, where is your black fucking George Washington who freed slaves from the south, dude? Come on.. SURELY you can think of a name that isn't a white guy. SURELY.

Washington had sex with blacks... does that count?

 

[Bass v 2.0]

HA!

yea... because there are so many black versions of the Emancipation Proclimation in the Smithsonian!




face it, dude... were it not for whites then your black ass would STILL be on the farm.

The Emancipation Proclamation did not free all blacks, you can read the document yourself jackass.

yea, dude.. not ONE single slave ever shed tears hearing that very document read because, you know, it effectively had NO impact on their existence or that of their children!

Repeat, the Emancipation proclamation did *NOT* free all blacks you dumb jackass, don't try sliding in that strawman argument. Need you be reminded of the stupidity of your claim again?



Featured Document: The Emancipation Proclamation

President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863, as the nation approached its third year of bloody civil war. The proclamation declared "that all persons held as slaves" within the rebellious states "are, and henceforward shall be free."

Despite this expansive wording, the Emancipation Proclamation was limited in many ways. It applied only to states that had seceded from the Union, leaving slavery untouched in the loyal border states. It also expressly exempted parts of the Confederacy that had already come under Northern control. Most important, the freedom it promised depended upon Union military victory.

Although the Emancipation Proclamation did not end slavery in the nation, it captured the hearts and imagination of millions of Americans and fundamentally transformed the character of the war. After January 1, 1863, every advance of federal troops expanded the domain of freedom. Moreover, the Proclamation announced the acceptance of black men into the Union Army and Navy, enabling the liberated to become liberators. By the end of the war, almost 200,000 black soldiers and sailors had fought for the Union and freedom.

The Emancipation Proclamation did more to help whites to preserve the Union, jackass.