Evidence That Trump’s EO is a Muslim Ban – from the Bigot Trump Himself

C_Clayton_Jones

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2011
76,683
36,436
2,290
In a Republic, actually
‘The States argue that the Executive Order violates the

Establishment and Equal Protection Clauses because it was

intended to disfavor Muslims. In support of this argument,

the States have offered evidence of numerous statements by

the President about his intent to implement a “Muslim ban”

as well as evidence they claim suggests that the Executive

Order was intended to be that ban, including sections 5(b)

and 5(e) of the Order. It is well established that evidence of

purpose beyond the face of the challenged law may be

considered in evaluating Establishment and Equal Protection

Clause claims.’

http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2017/02/09/17-35105.pdf

The court also acknowledges the fact that the EO does not afford those adversely effected the right to due process of the law, in violation of the Fifth Amendment; refugees and asylees were given neither notice nor an opportunity to respond.

Trump’s un-Constitutional EO is the epitome of rightwing bigotry, stupidity, and hate.
 
‘The States argue that the Executive Order violates the

Establishment and Equal Protection Clauses because it was

intended to disfavor Muslims. In support of this argument,

the States have offered evidence of numerous statements by

the President about his intent to implement a “Muslim ban”

as well as evidence they claim suggests that the Executive

Order was intended to be that ban, including sections 5(b)

and 5(e) of the Order. It is well established that evidence of

purpose beyond the face of the challenged law may be

considered in evaluating Establishment and Equal Protection

Clause claims.’

http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2017/02/09/17-35105.pdf

The court also acknowledges the fact that the EO does not afford those adversely effected the right to due process of the law, in violation of the Fifth Amendment; refugees and asylees were given neither notice nor an opportunity to respond.

Trump’s un-Constitutional EO is the epitome of rightwing bigotry, stupidity, and hate.

Except the EO still allows 90% of the worlds muslims the opportunity to enter, even during the pause.


Can't be what you think it is, cuz it ain't.
 
why the hell would someone start a thread when they are to much of a puss to defend what they are saying or are not taking any questions?.....
 
A bigot is someone who is intolerant of a person who is different.

If you are intolerant of Muslims then you are intolerant of everyone being IDENTICAL.
 
‘The States argue that the Executive Order violates the

Establishment and Equal Protection Clauses because it was

intended to disfavor Muslims. In support of this argument,

the States have offered evidence of numerous statements by

the President about his intent to implement a “Muslim ban”

as well as evidence they claim suggests that the Executive

Order was intended to be that ban, including sections 5(b)

and 5(e) of the Order. It is well established that evidence of

purpose beyond the face of the challenged law may be

considered in evaluating Establishment and Equal Protection

Clause claims.’

http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2017/02/09/17-35105.pdf

The court also acknowledges the fact that the EO does not afford those adversely effected the right to due process of the law, in violation of the Fifth Amendment; refugees and asylees were given neither notice nor an opportunity to respond.

Trump’s un-Constitutional EO is the epitome of rightwing bigotry, stupidity, and hate.
Thanks for posting it was getting dead around here without some professional trolls doing drive bys
 

Forum List

Back
Top