Evidence piles up that Bush administration got many pre-9/11 warnings

Actually dumbfuck, the banking mess, housing mess and 9-11 fall in Clinton's lap.

He left ticking time bombs for Bush that scum like you blame on Bush.

Clinton had his fingerprints all over Glass-Steagall, the CRA and stopping the CIA from killing UBL. Educate yourself, dumbfuck.

Ahh, yes, everything bad that happened in the Bush presidency was obviously Clinton's fault.

I will give you the fact that Glass-Steagal was overturned under Clinton, but last I heard, it was Congress that wrote legislation, not the President, and it was a Republican congress that wrote the law that overturned Glass-Steagal. Clinton just signed it.
 
the ticking timebombs that blew up on Bush's watch were put in place while Clinton was banging interns in the White House and lying about it.

UBL rose to power thanks to Bill Clinton ignoring him....but I'm sure you would've supported Bush bombing Afghanistan his first few months in office when he was trying to put his Admin together....not.

If Bush bombed UBL on 10 Sep 01 and prevented 9-11 from happening without even knowing about some "plot," you would've called Bush a war monger.

Actually dumbfuck, the banking mess, housing mess and 9-11 fall in Clinton's lap.

He left ticking time bombs for Bush that scum like you blame on Bush.

Clinton had his fingerprints all over Glass-Steagall, the CRA and stopping the CIA from killing UBL. Educate yourself, dumbfuck.

Ahh, yes, everything bad that happened in the Bush presidency was obviously Clinton's fault.

I will give you the fact that Glass-Steagal was overturned under Clinton, but last I heard, it was Congress that wrote legislation, not the President, and it was a Republican congress that wrote the law that overturned Glass-Steagal. Clinton just signed it.
 
Clinton's attorney general issues a memo telling the CIA and the FBI that they will face criminal charges if they share information and nobody complains including the media because a democrat is in the white house. The jihad terrorists are attending flight school on Clinton's watch and he is diddling Monica under the desk and preparing to bomb the snot out of freaking Yugoslavia. FDR had about ten years to prepare for the inevitable attack by the Japanese and the left wing has been making excuses for his negligence for 70 years. If Bush made any mistakes the biggest was not cleaning house and firing every fat assed bureaucrat in both the CIA and the FBI but he was a nice guy and let them stay on and he got the blame for their negligence.
 
Clinton's attorney general issues a memo telling the CIA and the FBI that they will face criminal charges if they share information and nobody complains including the media because a democrat is in the white house. The jihad terrorists are attending flight school on Clinton's watch and he is diddling Monica under the desk and preparing to bomb the snot out of freaking Yugoslavia. FDR had about ten years to prepare for the inevitable attack by the Japanese and the left wing has been making excuses for his negligence for 70 years. If Bush made any mistakes the biggest was not cleaning house and firing every fat assed bureaucrat in both the CIA and the FBI but he was a nice guy and let them stay on and he got the blame for their negligence.

FDR was at fault for allowing Pearl Harbor to happen, the same way George Bush was responsible for 9/11.

FDR then went on to win a massive war against Japan and their ally, Germany, leading to the most prosperous period in US history.

Bush went on to invade a country that had nothing to do with the surprise attack, put our nation into massive debt, and then crash the economy just in time for his successor to take office.

See the difference?
 
Bush was not going to do ANYTHING to offend his Saudi heroes. Remember when he offered the 9/11 financiers 50 billion, and they thumbed their noses at him? He still worshiped the Saudi King; American lives meant nothing to Bush II compared to Saudi approval.
 
Idiot....Bush attacked the Taliban after 9-11, you must've missed that FACT.

Clinton's attorney general issues a memo telling the CIA and the FBI that they will face criminal charges if they share information and nobody complains including the media because a democrat is in the white house. The jihad terrorists are attending flight school on Clinton's watch and he is diddling Monica under the desk and preparing to bomb the snot out of freaking Yugoslavia. FDR had about ten years to prepare for the inevitable attack by the Japanese and the left wing has been making excuses for his negligence for 70 years. If Bush made any mistakes the biggest was not cleaning house and firing every fat assed bureaucrat in both the CIA and the FBI but he was a nice guy and let them stay on and he got the blame for their negligence.

FDR was at fault for allowing Pearl Harbor to happen, the same way George Bush was responsible for 9/11.

FDR then went on to win a massive war against Japan and their ally, Germany, leading to the most prosperous period in US history.

Bush went on to invade a country that had nothing to do with the surprise attack, put our nation into massive debt, and then crash the economy just in time for his successor to take office.

See the difference?
 
I saw this guy on CNN tonight trying to defend his claims he couldn't it was really funny watching him try and explain why the 9-11 commission did not come up with the same results he did. The guy came off as a pathetic partisan hack trying to use the tragedy for political purposes in a election year. Interesting comparision here FDR had lots of warnings about a attack by Japan yet we were got off guard at Pearl Harbor the reason being the warnings pointed to attacks on bases overseas spread across the Pacific not Pearl Harbor. 9-11 has a very similar ring to it if your willing to look past the partisan ideology and see it.
 
I saw this guy on CNN tonight trying to defend his claims he couldn't it was really funny watching him try and explain why the 9-11 commission did not come up with the same results he did. The guy came off as a pathetic partisan hack trying to use the tragedy for political purposes in a election year. Interesting comparision here FDR had lots of warnings about a attack by Japan yet we were got off guard at Pearl Harbor the reason being the warnings pointed to attacks on bases overseas spread across the Pacific not Pearl Harbor. 9-11 has a very similar ring to it if your willing to look past the partisan ideology and see it.

Again, FDR was responsible for the failures that led to Pearl Harbor. There is no doubt about it.

It's the response that is the difference between the two.
 
You claimed Bush just went after Saddam once 9-11 happened.

Saddam was still at war with the US when 9-11 happened, it was just in a ceasefire. Bill Clinton made it US policy to remove Saddam from power in 1998, so after 9-11 George Bush finalized that deal once the Taliban and UBL were removed from power in Afghanistan.

Idiot....Bush attacked the Taliban after 9-11, you must've missed that FACT.

Didn't miss it at all.

Doesn't change what I said in the least.
 
I saw this guy on CNN tonight trying to defend his claims he couldn't it was really funny watching him try and explain why the 9-11 commission did not come up with the same results he did. The guy came off as a pathetic partisan hack trying to use the tragedy for political purposes in a election year. Interesting comparision here FDR had lots of warnings about a attack by Japan yet we were got off guard at Pearl Harbor the reason being the warnings pointed to attacks on bases overseas spread across the Pacific not Pearl Harbor. 9-11 has a very similar ring to it if your willing to look past the partisan ideology and see it.

Again, FDR was responsible for the failures that led to Pearl Harbor. There is no doubt about it.

It's the response that is the difference between the two.
No the truth is FDR is not responsible for it in both Pearl Harbor and 9-11 there were warnings and signs that a enemy wanted to attack and in both cases there was never any evidence to show that either Pearl or the twin towers was the primary target. Despite all the this talk there has never been any evidence brought forward to show that Japan would hit Pearl on December 7th the same with 9-11 no evidence showing a attack was planned for New York and the twin towers on September 11th. All this is just Monday morning quarterbacks trying to use tragedies for political gain nothing more.
 
Evidence piles up that Bush administration got many pre-9/11 warnings - Open Channel

By Robert Windrem
NBC News
On the 11th anniversary of the worst terrorist attack on U.S. soil, there is mounting evidence that the Bush administration received more intelligence warnings than previously known prior to the Sept. 11 attacks that killed nearly 3,000.
Kurt Eichenwald, a former New York Times reporter, wrote in an op-ed piece in Tuesday’s newspaper about a number of previously unknown warnings relayed to the White House by U.S. intelligence in the weeks and months prior to the attacks. Eichenwald wrote of the warnings in his new book, “500 Days: Secrets and Lies in the Terror Wars.”
And former US intelligence officials say there were even more warnings, pointing to a little noticed section of George Tenet’s memoir, “At the Center of the Storm.”
In it, Tenet describes a July 10, 2001, meeting at the White House in the office of Condoleezza Rice, then President George W. Bush’s national security adviser. The meeting was not discussed in the 9-11 Commission’s final report on the attacks, although Tenet wrote that he provided information on it to the commission.
<more>

I am sure you fucking Partisan Hacks, who chose this day for this BS, assume that we never got any of this intel, or any warnings, Before Bush, when Clinton was in Office eh? The Whole attack was planned and carried out in the 9 months Bush was in Office right?

You people are really low, Classless fucks, You know that?

lol
 
You claimed Bush just went after Saddam once 9-11 happened.

Saddam was still at war with the US when 9-11 happened, it was just in a ceasefire.
There was no war going on with Iraq, you moron. Just UN inspections.

You are the Moron fucktard, there was a UN mandated No fly Zone, that US planes patrolled Daily, and Iraqi Anti air fire was a Regular Occurrence. The First Gulf War was never legally, or official Ended with a Truce, there was a UN Cease Fire in Effect, a provision of which was the No Fly Zone, and Iraqi Compliance with Inspections which they never fully did. Iraq was in Direct Violation of the Terms of the 1991 Cease Fire Agreement for the Entire 12 Years between the 2 wars, Both by not cooperating with Inspections, and by Firing on US and other Nations Planes patrolling the No Fly Zone flying UN flags.

You need to educate yourself, you pathetic left wing Lemming.
 
Last edited:
You are the Moron fucktard, there was a UN mandated No fly Zone, that US planes patrolled Daily, and Iraqi Anti air fire was a Regular Occurrence.
That's because we were bombing the shit out of them. Are you saying they don't have a right to defend themselves?

The First Gulf War was never legally, or official Ended with a Truce, there was a UN Cease Fire in Effect, a provision of which was the No Fly Zone, and Iraqi Compliance with Inspections which they never fully did. Iraq was in Direct Violation of the Terms of the 1991 Cease Fire Agreement for the Entire 12 Years between the 2 wars, Both by not cooperating with Inspections, and by Firing on US and other Nations Planes patrolling the No Fly Zone flying UN flags.

You need to educate yourself, you pathetic left wing Lemming.
It was not our call to unilaterally decide for the UNSC if they were in compliance or not. And the last report to the Security Counsel from Hans Blix, who's job it was to determine whether they were cooperating, did not state they were in breach of 1441.
 
I am trying to find out who was President back in 1993 when the World Trade Center was bombed the first time.Why wasn't that administration held accountable?....Maybe if they had changed the way intelligence was shared among agencies we would not have had the attack again in 2001.

Just a thought....

Hmm, it's a good thing they arrested everyone responsible for that then, isn't it?

Seems to me like that should have served as an even greater warning to the next administration that some serious shit was going down.

Too bad Bush didn't care until after the deed was done.

Arresting everyone responsible did not prevent the attack. Do any of you Monday morning quarterbacks understand the word "actionable" when it refers to intelligence? We know, the FBI knows, and every police force in the country knows, that banks will be robbed this month. Knowing that means nothing, unless one or more of those agencies have actionable intelligence that gives them a clue as to where, when, how, and/or who.

The Bush administration had no more actionable intelligence than the Clinton administration had, and that was zilch. They had no choice but to hope that one of the intelligence agencies, or a police agency, picked up something they could work on.
 

Forum List

Back
Top