Evidence for Man-Made Climate Change Getting Even Stronger

[Trakar]

Evidence for Man-Made Climate Change Getting Even Stronger

Does this mean the liars and fakers on the side of AGW will stop lying and faking data?

What liars and fakers are you referring to, and what is the "side of AGW?"

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Evidence for Man-Made Climate Change Getting Even Stronger

Does this mean the liars and fakers on the side of AGW will stop lying and faking data?

What liars and fakers are you referring to, and what is the "side of AGW?"

You know, we're to blame, nothing to do with natural cycles.

 

[Trakar]

Evidence for Man-Made Climate Change Getting Even Stronger

Does this mean the liars and fakers on the side of AGW will stop lying and faking data?

What liars and fakers are you referring to, and what is the "side of AGW?"

You know, we're to blame, nothing to do with natural cycles.

Your reference does not support your assertion, and your additional assertion does not comport with any AGW theory that I am aware of, but please feel free to support the additional assertion along with a compelling supporting reference for the original assertion if you find any.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

What liars and fakers are you referring to, and what is the "side of AGW?"

You know, we're to blame, nothing to do with natural cycles.

Your reference does not support your assertion, and your additional assertion does not comport with any AGW theory that I am aware of, but please feel free to support the additional assertion along with a compelling supporting reference for the original assertion if you find any.

Mann didn't lie? Didn't fake data? Didn't cover it up?
Maybe you missed his emails?

 

[Old Rocks]

You have made to assertation, provide the proof.

 

[Koios]

You know, we're to blame, nothing to do with natural cycles.

Your reference does not support your assertion, and your additional assertion does not comport with any AGW theory that I am aware of, but please feel free to support the additional assertion along with a compelling supporting reference for the original assertion if you find any.

Mann didn't lie? Didn't fake data? Didn't cover it up?
Maybe you missed his emails?

No. No. No. Not I.

 

[Trakar]

You know, we're to blame, nothing to do with natural cycles.

Your reference does not support your assertion, and your additional assertion does not comport with any AGW theory that I am aware of, but please feel free to support the additional assertion along with a compelling supporting reference for the original assertion if you find any.

Mann didn't lie? Didn't fake data? Didn't cover it up?
Maybe you missed his emails?

Those are some of the additional assertions you have made that I am asking you to compellingly and objectively support.