every Russian diplomat should be expelled immediately from the US. start EXTREME sanctions NOW

Trump is the first president elected since Nixon to refuse to release his tax returns, and any payments from Russia remain secret

Just to clarify, the 36 presidents before him did not.
Since Nixon

The statement was constructed to sound as if ALL presidents had released their taxes, when of course the optional practice began with Nixon, who was trying to fend off Watergate.
Anyone with a working brain has got to know the slime Scump is hiding things that would prove to be a disaster for him ;;hiding his school grades too? Must have been last in class

In the absence of evidence, public speculation is risky.

Also, recall that Obama sealed all his academic records. We wonder why, eh?
 
Trump is the first president elected since Nixon to refuse to release his tax returns, and any payments from Russia remain secret

Just to clarify, the 36 presidents before him did not.
Since Nixon

The statement was constructed to sound as if ALL presidents had released their taxes, when of course the optional practice began with Nixon, who was trying to fend off Watergate.
Anyone with a working brain has got to know the slime Scump is hiding things that would prove to be a disaster for him ;;hiding his school grades too? Must have been last in class

In the absence of evidence, public speculation is risky.

Also, recall that Obama sealed all his academic records. We wonder why, eh?
Sorry BK NOT SEALED
This is an example of mostly old baloney in a new casing. It mainly recycles years-old falsehoods and insinuations, most of which we covered long ago, in connection with an earlier viral email.

But with President Barack Obamaā€™s reelection campaign heating up, this new graphic has appeared on countless anti-Obama websites and in viral emails like the one weā€™ve reprinted here. Very little that it contains is new, and the old falsehoods have not improved with age.

Nothing ā€˜Sealedā€™

The idea that any Obama record is ā€œsealedā€ is a falsehood, to start. The word ā€œsealedā€ when applied to documents ordinarily refers to records that would normally be public, but that a judge has ruled cannot be released without the courtā€™s permission. Common examples of truly ā€œsealedā€ documents include records of crimes committed as a juvenile or records of adoptions. None of the claims in this message refers to records actually ā€œsealedā€ in that usual sense.

In some cases, the records this screed claims are ā€œsealedā€ are actually public, and open for anyone to see. Other supposedly ā€œsealedā€ records are normally private documents that Obama hasnā€™t released ā€” and that other presidential candidates havenā€™t released either.

So as with earlier versions, this is little more than an attempt to raise suspicions by asking for records that arenā€™t ordinarily made public, without any evidence that those records contain anything derogatory. Weā€™ll take the claims and questions in the order they appear.

  • Claims #1, 2 and 4, college records. Obamaā€™s college records are not ā€œsealedā€ by a court order, as this graphic would have you believe. It would be illegal under federal law (the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974) for Occidental, Columbia or Harvard Law School to give anyformer studentā€™s records to reporters or members of the public without that personā€™s specific, written permission. Obama hasnā€™t released them, but neither have other presidential candidates released their college records. George W. Bushā€™s grades at Yale eventually became public, but only because somebody leaked them to the New Yorker magazine. Bush himself refused to release them, according to a 1999 profile in the Washington Post.
  • Claim #3, thesis paper. Obama did write a paper on nuclear disarmament for an honors course in American foreign policy during his senior year, but it wasnā€™t the sort of ā€œthesisā€ that some colleges require for graduation and keep on file in their libraries, like those that Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama released. During the 2008 campaign, reporters were told that Columbia had not retained a copy of Obamaā€™s 1983 paper, and that Obama didnā€™t have a copy, either. NBC News contacted his former professor, Michael Baron, who said he looked for his copy but couldnā€™t find it, and thought he probably tossed it out eight years earlier in a move.
 
every Russian diplomat should be expelled immediately from the US and every Russian company with even remote ties to the Russian government should be sanctioned up the ass. there is no need to improve relations with a government intent on destroying ours. fuck that

And if need be, we must have war! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR!

You want to US to go to war with Russia over Obama's failure to secure the 2016 election?

Just curious whose side do you think China would take?
 
every Russian diplomat should be expelled immediately from the US and every Russian company with even remote ties to the Russian government should be sanctioned up the ass. there is no need to improve relations with a government intent on destroying ours. fuck that

And if need be, we must have war! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR!

You want to US to go to war with Russia over Obama's failure to secure the 2016 election?

Just curious whose side do you think China would take?
Russia and China are good pals now thanks to the moron in the WH
 
Just to clarify, the 36 presidents before him did not.
Since Nixon

The statement was constructed to sound as if ALL presidents had released their taxes, when of course the optional practice began with Nixon, who was trying to fend off Watergate.
Anyone with a working brain has got to know the slime Scump is hiding things that would prove to be a disaster for him ;;hiding his school grades too? Must have been last in class

In the absence of evidence, public speculation is risky.

Also, recall that Obama sealed all his academic records. We wonder why, eh?
Sorry BK NOT SEALED
This is an example of mostly old baloney in a new casing. It mainly recycles years-old falsehoods and insinuations, most of which we covered long ago, in connection with an earlier viral email.

But with President Barack Obamaā€™s reelection campaign heating up, this new graphic has appeared on countless anti-Obama websites and in viral emails like the one weā€™ve reprinted here. Very little that it contains is new, and the old falsehoods have not improved with age.

Nothing ā€˜Sealedā€™

The idea that any Obama record is ā€œsealedā€ is a falsehood, to start. The word ā€œsealedā€ when applied to documents ordinarily refers to records that would normally be public, but that a judge has ruled cannot be released without the courtā€™s permission. Common examples of truly ā€œsealedā€ documents include records of crimes committed as a juvenile or records of adoptions. None of the claims in this message refers to records actually ā€œsealedā€ in that usual sense.

In some cases, the records this screed claims are ā€œsealedā€ are actually public, and open for anyone to see. Other supposedly ā€œsealedā€ records are normally private documents that Obama hasnā€™t released ā€” and that other presidential candidates havenā€™t released either.

So as with earlier versions, this is little more than an attempt to raise suspicions by asking for records that arenā€™t ordinarily made public, without any evidence that those records contain anything derogatory. Weā€™ll take the claims and questions in the order they appear.

  • Claims #1, 2 and 4, college records. Obamaā€™s college records are not ā€œsealedā€ by a court order, as this graphic would have you believe. It would be illegal under federal law (the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974) for Occidental, Columbia or Harvard Law School to give anyformer studentā€™s records to reporters or members of the public without that personā€™s specific, written permission. Obama hasnā€™t released them, but neither have other presidential candidates released their college records. George W. Bushā€™s grades at Yale eventually became public, but only because somebody leaked them to the New Yorker magazine. Bush himself refused to release them, according to a 1999 profile in the Washington Post.
  • Claim #3, thesis paper. Obama did write a paper on nuclear disarmament for an honors course in American foreign policy during his senior year, but it wasnā€™t the sort of ā€œthesisā€ that some colleges require for graduation and keep on file in their libraries, like those that Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama released. During the 2008 campaign, reporters were told that Columbia had not retained a copy of Obamaā€™s 1983 paper, and that Obama didnā€™t have a copy, either. NBC News contacted his former professor, Michael Baron, who said he looked for his copy but couldnā€™t find it, and thought he probably tossed it out eight years earlier in a move.

Bullshit. His history was intentionally hidden.
 
every Russian diplomat should be expelled immediately from the US and every Russian company with even remote ties to the Russian government should be sanctioned up the ass. there is no need to improve relations with a government intent on destroying ours. fuck that

And if need be, we must have war! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR!
stupid_meter.gif
 
every Russian diplomat should be expelled immediately from the US and every Russian company with even remote ties to the Russian government should be sanctioned up the ass. there is no need to improve relations with a government intent on destroying ours. fuck that

And if need be, we must have war! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR!

You want to US to go to war with Russia over Obama's failure to secure the 2016 election?

Just curious whose side do you think China would take?
Russia and China are good pals now thanks to the moron in the WH
upload_2018-7-4_11-3-13.jpeg
 
Since Nixon

The statement was constructed to sound as if ALL presidents had released their taxes, when of course the optional practice began with Nixon, who was trying to fend off Watergate.
Anyone with a working brain has got to know the slime Scump is hiding things that would prove to be a disaster for him ;;hiding his school grades too? Must have been last in class

In the absence of evidence, public speculation is risky.

Also, recall that Obama sealed all his academic records. We wonder why, eh?
Sorry BK NOT SEALED
This is an example of mostly old baloney in a new casing. It mainly recycles years-old falsehoods and insinuations, most of which we covered long ago, in connection with an earlier viral email.

But with President Barack Obamaā€™s reelection campaign heating up, this new graphic has appeared on countless anti-Obama websites and in viral emails like the one weā€™ve reprinted here. Very little that it contains is new, and the old falsehoods have not improved with age.

Nothing ā€˜Sealedā€™

The idea that any Obama record is ā€œsealedā€ is a falsehood, to start. The word ā€œsealedā€ when applied to documents ordinarily refers to records that would normally be public, but that a judge has ruled cannot be released without the courtā€™s permission. Common examples of truly ā€œsealedā€ documents include records of crimes committed as a juvenile or records of adoptions. None of the claims in this message refers to records actually ā€œsealedā€ in that usual sense.

In some cases, the records this screed claims are ā€œsealedā€ are actually public, and open for anyone to see. Other supposedly ā€œsealedā€ records are normally private documents that Obama hasnā€™t released ā€” and that other presidential candidates havenā€™t released either.

So as with earlier versions, this is little more than an attempt to raise suspicions by asking for records that arenā€™t ordinarily made public, without any evidence that those records contain anything derogatory. Weā€™ll take the claims and questions in the order they appear.

  • Claims #1, 2 and 4, college records. Obamaā€™s college records are not ā€œsealedā€ by a court order, as this graphic would have you believe. It would be illegal under federal law (the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974) for Occidental, Columbia or Harvard Law School to give anyformer studentā€™s records to reporters or members of the public without that personā€™s specific, written permission. Obama hasnā€™t released them, but neither have other presidential candidates released their college records. George W. Bushā€™s grades at Yale eventually became public, but only because somebody leaked them to the New Yorker magazine. Bush himself refused to release them, according to a 1999 profile in the Washington Post.
  • Claim #3, thesis paper. Obama did write a paper on nuclear disarmament for an honors course in American foreign policy during his senior year, but it wasnā€™t the sort of ā€œthesisā€ that some colleges require for graduation and keep on file in their libraries, like those that Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama released. During the 2008 campaign, reporters were told that Columbia had not retained a copy of Obamaā€™s 1983 paper, and that Obama didnā€™t have a copy, either. NBC News contacted his former professor, Michael Baron, who said he looked for his copy but couldnā€™t find it, and thought he probably tossed it out eight years earlier in a move.

Bullshit. His history was intentionally hidden.
LOL Even proof doesn't satisfy repubs ...I suppose Obama threatened to sue if they were shown???lol Like scump has
 
The statement was constructed to sound as if ALL presidents had released their taxes, when of course the optional practice began with Nixon, who was trying to fend off Watergate.
Anyone with a working brain has got to know the slime Scump is hiding things that would prove to be a disaster for him ;;hiding his school grades too? Must have been last in class

In the absence of evidence, public speculation is risky.

Also, recall that Obama sealed all his academic records. We wonder why, eh?
Sorry BK NOT SEALED
This is an example of mostly old baloney in a new casing. It mainly recycles years-old falsehoods and insinuations, most of which we covered long ago, in connection with an earlier viral email.

But with President Barack Obamaā€™s reelection campaign heating up, this new graphic has appeared on countless anti-Obama websites and in viral emails like the one weā€™ve reprinted here. Very little that it contains is new, and the old falsehoods have not improved with age.

Nothing ā€˜Sealedā€™

The idea that any Obama record is ā€œsealedā€ is a falsehood, to start. The word ā€œsealedā€ when applied to documents ordinarily refers to records that would normally be public, but that a judge has ruled cannot be released without the courtā€™s permission. Common examples of truly ā€œsealedā€ documents include records of crimes committed as a juvenile or records of adoptions. None of the claims in this message refers to records actually ā€œsealedā€ in that usual sense.

In some cases, the records this screed claims are ā€œsealedā€ are actually public, and open for anyone to see. Other supposedly ā€œsealedā€ records are normally private documents that Obama hasnā€™t released ā€” and that other presidential candidates havenā€™t released either.

So as with earlier versions, this is little more than an attempt to raise suspicions by asking for records that arenā€™t ordinarily made public, without any evidence that those records contain anything derogatory. Weā€™ll take the claims and questions in the order they appear.

  • Claims #1, 2 and 4, college records. Obamaā€™s college records are not ā€œsealedā€ by a court order, as this graphic would have you believe. It would be illegal under federal law (the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974) for Occidental, Columbia or Harvard Law School to give anyformer studentā€™s records to reporters or members of the public without that personā€™s specific, written permission. Obama hasnā€™t released them, but neither have other presidential candidates released their college records. George W. Bushā€™s grades at Yale eventually became public, but only because somebody leaked them to the New Yorker magazine. Bush himself refused to release them, according to a 1999 profile in the Washington Post.
  • Claim #3, thesis paper. Obama did write a paper on nuclear disarmament for an honors course in American foreign policy during his senior year, but it wasnā€™t the sort of ā€œthesisā€ that some colleges require for graduation and keep on file in their libraries, like those that Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama released. During the 2008 campaign, reporters were told that Columbia had not retained a copy of Obamaā€™s 1983 paper, and that Obama didnā€™t have a copy, either. NBC News contacted his former professor, Michael Baron, who said he looked for his copy but couldnā€™t find it, and thought he probably tossed it out eight years earlier in a move.

Bullshit. His history was intentionally hidden.
LOL Even proof doesn't satisfy repubs

Try supplying some, and we'll see.
 
Keep the Russians. Expel the Democrats.

Spoken like a Russian troll.

Au contraire, spoken like an American. The Democratic Party is a far greater danger to the United States than is Russia.

That's not what the CIA, the FBI, the NSA, Homeland Security, and the Mueller Report all say. These Trump appointees all say that Russians interfered with the 2016 election to get Donald Trump elected, and to destroy trust in American democratic institutions.

That you support the Russians is indicative of the level of Russian trolling on this board.
 
Keep the Russians. Expel the Democrats.

Spoken like a Russian troll.

Au contraire, spoken like an American. The Democratic Party is a far greater danger to the United States than is Russia.

That's not what the CIA, the FBI, the NSA, Homeland Security, and the Mueller Report all say. These Trump appointees all say that Russians interfered with the 2016 election to get Donald Trump elected, and to destroy trust in American democratic institutions.

That you support the Russians is indicative of the level of Russian trolling on this board.

My disdain for Democrats does not translate to support for Russia.

We will see just who worked with whom to pop the election very soon.
 
Congress put a lot of money out to be used to keep Russia & others from interfering in our elections, all talk no action. not one penny has been spent to protect us.
 
Keep the Russians. Expel the Democrats.

Spoken like a Russian troll.

Au contraire, spoken like an American. The Democratic Party is a far greater danger to the United States than is Russia.

That's not what the CIA, the FBI, the NSA, Homeland Security, and the Mueller Report all say. These Trump appointees all say that Russians interfered with the 2016 election to get Donald Trump elected, and to destroy trust in American democratic institutions.

That you support the Russians is indicative of the level of Russian trolling on this board.

My disdain for Democrats does not translate to support for Russia.

We will see just who worked with whom to pop the election very soon.
You donā€™t support Russia?
Therefore, you believe Western sanctions against Russia should be maintained?
 
Keep the Russians. Expel the Democrats.

Spoken like a Russian troll.

Au contraire, spoken like an American. The Democratic Party is a far greater danger to the United States than is Russia.

That's not what the CIA, the FBI, the NSA, Homeland Security, and the Mueller Report all say. These Trump appointees all say that Russians interfered with the 2016 election to get Donald Trump elected, and to destroy trust in American democratic institutions.

That you support the Russians is indicative of the level of Russian trolling on this board.

My disdain for Democrats does not translate to support for Russia.

We will see just who worked with whom to pop the election very soon.
You donā€™t support Russia?
Therefore, you believe Western sanctions against Russia should be maintained?

Yes.
 
Keep the Russians. Expel the Democrats.

Spoken like a Russian troll.

Au contraire, spoken like an American. The Democratic Party is a far greater danger to the United States than is Russia.

That's not what the CIA, the FBI, the NSA, Homeland Security, and the Mueller Report all say. These Trump appointees all say that Russians interfered with the 2016 election to get Donald Trump elected, and to destroy trust in American democratic institutions.

That you support the Russians is indicative of the level of Russian trolling on this board.

My disdain for Democrats does not translate to support for Russia.

We will see just who worked with whom to pop the election very soon.

We ALREADY KNOW who did it. The ONLY people who say it wasn't the Russians, are Trump and his staff - people who have lied to the American public hundreds of times, and in the case of Trump himself, thousands of times. Barr is NOT investigating the Democrats.

Vladimir Putin stood on a stage in Helsinki and said he wanted Donald Trump to be President of the United States. And still you try to sell Trump's lie that it was the Democrats who were colluding with Russia. You have to be a total idiot to keep parroting this lie.
 
Keep the Russians. Expel the Democrats.

Spoken like a Russian troll.

Au contraire, spoken like an American. The Democratic Party is a far greater danger to the United States than is Russia.

That's not what the CIA, the FBI, the NSA, Homeland Security, and the Mueller Report all say. These Trump appointees all say that Russians interfered with the 2016 election to get Donald Trump elected, and to destroy trust in American democratic institutions.

That you support the Russians is indicative of the level of Russian trolling on this board.

My disdain for Democrats does not translate to support for Russia.

We will see just who worked with whom to pop the election very soon.

We ALREADY KNOW who did it. The ONLY people who say it wasn't the Russians, are Trump and his staff - people who have lied to the American public hundreds of times, and in the case of Trump himself, thousands of times. Barr is NOT investigating the Democrats.

Vladimir Putin stood on a stage in Helsinki and said he wanted Donald Trump to be President of the United States. And still you try to sell Trump's lie that it was the Democrats who were colluding with Russia. You have to be a total idiot to keep parroting this lie.

So impeach him. Please. Discovery will be fascinating
 
every Russian diplomat should be expelled immediately from the US and every Russian company with even remote ties to the Russian government should be sanctioned up the ass. there is no need to improve relations with a government intent on destroying ours. fuck that

And if need be, we must have war! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR!
Ummmm what about the 30 million illegals here possibly voting but definitely influenceing elections??
 
every Russian diplomat should be expelled immediately from the US and every Russian company with even remote ties to the Russian government should be sanctioned up the ass. there is no need to improve relations with a government intent on destroying ours. fuck that

And if need be, we must have war! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR!
Ummmm what about the 30 million illegals here possibly voting but definitely influenceing elections??
just because some people did something, doesnt mean we should lose our shit!
 

Forum List

Back
Top