Even USMB Republicans can't deny voter suppression. Not after so many Republicans boast about it.

[rdean]

Accidental Republican candor about voter-ID laws

Jim DeMint, the former South Carolina senator and Tea Party firebrand who is now the president of the Heritage Foundation, became the latest in a string of conservatives to admit that restrictive voting laws such as voter ID requirements are an attempt to help Republicans win elections, telling a St. Louis radio host yesterday that voter ID laws help elect “more conservative candidates.”

“t’s something we’re working on all over the country because in the states where they do have voter ID laws you’ve seen, actually, elections begin to change towards more conservative candidates,” he said.

(Notice: He's not saying Republicans are trying to get more people to vote, they are trying to keep others from voting. That's what traitors do. People that know they have no policies to win by.)

Republicans Boast About Voter Suppression in Tampa, but the Ground Is Shifting

The bill’s author, state Representative Alan Clemmons, took the stand yesterday and admitted he cannot produce a single example of in-person voter impersonation, and also conceded his law wouldn’t really stop a dedicated impersonator anyhow. Then, one lawyer presented racist e-mails sent to Clemmons about voter-identification laws—with which Clemmons agreed. (Someone e-mailed Clemmons to denounce the idea that black voters wouldn’t sign up for photo identification if an incentive was offered, saying “it would be like a swarm of bees going after a watermelon.” Clemmons replied, “Amen, Ed, thank you for your support,” a response he admitted in court yesterday was “poorly considered.”)

Republicans Admit Voter-ID Laws Are Aimed at Democratic Voters

So we should be thankful for Schlafly’s candor. The more Republicans acknowledge that these laws are designed to suppress the votes of blacks, Latinos, and others, the easier building a movement to stop them will be.

Birth certificates ordinarily cost $22. The state offers ones costing $2 to $3 for election purposes, Justice Ginsburg wrote, but it had not publicized that option on the relevant website or on forms for requesting birth certificates.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/30/u...-voter-id-law-intact-with-a-warning.html?_r=0

“Even at $2, the toll is at odds with this court’s precedent,” she wrote, citinga 1966 decision striking down Virginia’s poll tax.



---------------------------------------------

Republicans think their traitorous and treacherous behavior is clever. But with just a 37% approval rating, they are digging their party's grave. Oh, the party isn't going away, but it will change so much, it will be like the 60's when all the liberals and moderates left and all the Confederates, the KKK, the Aryan Nation and all the other racists move into the GOP. The party has to change. The base doesn't like it's disastrous and disgraceful leadership. The GOP leadership is so bad, the base is embarrassed.

 

[Dale Smith]

Voting doesn't mean diddly squat. The people that the elites want in will get in. All you are doing is picking which candidate (of their choosing) will be the next face of the franchise of USA.INC as CEO in name only. If this phony election cycle hasn't awaken people to what a sham it is, they are terminally stupid. Theater and nothing more.

 

[AmericanFirst1]

Accidental Republican candor about voter-ID laws

Jim DeMint, the former South Carolina senator and Tea Party firebrand who is now the president of the Heritage Foundation, became the latest in a string of conservatives to admit that restrictive voting laws such as voter ID requirements are an attempt to help Republicans win elections, telling a St. Louis radio host yesterday that voter ID laws help elect “more conservative candidates.”

“t’s something we’re working on all over the country because in the states where they do have voter ID laws you’ve seen, actually, elections begin to change towards more conservative candidates,” he said.

(Notice: He's not saying Republicans are trying to get more people to vote, they are trying to keep others from voting. That's what traitors do. People that know they have no policies to win by.)

Republicans Boast About Voter Suppression in Tampa, but the Ground Is Shifting

The bill’s author, state Representative Alan Clemmons, took the stand yesterday and admitted he cannot produce a single example of in-person voter impersonation, and also conceded his law wouldn’t really stop a dedicated impersonator anyhow. Then, one lawyer presented racist e-mails sent to Clemmons about voter-identification laws—with which Clemmons agreed. (Someone e-mailed Clemmons to denounce the idea that black voters wouldn’t sign up for photo identification if an incentive was offered, saying “it would be like a swarm of bees going after a watermelon.” Clemmons replied, “Amen, Ed, thank you for your support,” a response he admitted in court yesterday was “poorly considered.”)

Republicans Admit Voter-ID Laws Are Aimed at Democratic Voters

So we should be thankful for Schlafly’s candor. The more Republicans acknowledge that these laws are designed to suppress the votes of blacks, Latinos, and others, the easier building a movement to stop them will be.

Birth certificates ordinarily cost $22. The state offers ones costing $2 to $3 for election purposes, Justice Ginsburg wrote, but it had not publicized that option on the relevant website or on forms for requesting birth certificates.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/30/u...-voter-id-law-intact-with-a-warning.html?_r=0

“Even at $2, the toll is at odds with this court’s precedent,” she wrote, citinga 1966 decision striking down Virginia’s poll tax.



---------------------------------------------

Republicans think their traitorous and treacherous behavior is clever. But with just a 37% approval rating, they are digging their party's grave. Oh, the party isn't going away, but it will change so much, it will be like the 60's when all the liberals and moderates left and all the Confederates, the KKK, the Aryan Nation and all the other racists move into the GOP. The party has to change. The base doesn't like it's disastrous and disgraceful leadership. The GOP leadership is so bad, the base is embarrassed.

He is wrong, as are you retarded libs.

 

[PredFan]

Accidental Republican candor about voter-ID laws

Jim DeMint, the former South Carolina senator and Tea Party firebrand who is now the president of the Heritage Foundation, became the latest in a string of conservatives to admit that restrictive voting laws such as voter ID requirements are an attempt to help Republicans win elections, telling a St. Louis radio host yesterday that voter ID laws help elect “more conservative candidates.”

“t’s something we’re working on all over the country because in the states where they do have voter ID laws you’ve seen, actually, elections begin to change towards more conservative candidates,” he said.

(Notice: He's not saying Republicans are trying to get more people to vote, they are trying to keep others from voting. That's what traitors do. People that know they have no policies to win by.)

Republicans Boast About Voter Suppression in Tampa, but the Ground Is Shifting

The bill’s author, state Representative Alan Clemmons, took the stand yesterday and admitted he cannot produce a single example of in-person voter impersonation, and also conceded his law wouldn’t really stop a dedicated impersonator anyhow. Then, one lawyer presented racist e-mails sent to Clemmons about voter-identification laws—with which Clemmons agreed. (Someone e-mailed Clemmons to denounce the idea that black voters wouldn’t sign up for photo identification if an incentive was offered, saying “it would be like a swarm of bees going after a watermelon.” Clemmons replied, “Amen, Ed, thank you for your support,” a response he admitted in court yesterday was “poorly considered.”)

Republicans Admit Voter-ID Laws Are Aimed at Democratic Voters

So we should be thankful for Schlafly’s candor. The more Republicans acknowledge that these laws are designed to suppress the votes of blacks, Latinos, and others, the easier building a movement to stop them will be.

Birth certificates ordinarily cost $22. The state offers ones costing $2 to $3 for election purposes, Justice Ginsburg wrote, but it had not publicized that option on the relevant website or on forms for requesting birth certificates.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/30/u...-voter-id-law-intact-with-a-warning.html?_r=0

“Even at $2, the toll is at odds with this court’s precedent,” she wrote, citinga 1966 decision striking down Virginia’s poll tax.



---------------------------------------------

Republicans think their traitorous and treacherous behavior is clever. But with just a 37% approval rating, they are digging their party's grave. Oh, the party isn't going away, but it will change so much, it will be like the 60's when all the liberals and moderates left and all the Confederates, the KKK, the Aryan Nation and all the other racists move into the GOP. The party has to change. The base doesn't like it's disastrous and disgraceful leadership. The GOP leadership is so bad, the base is embarrassed.

Your fail thread starts with a false premise; that voter IDs suppress voting.

As per always, you are a liar.

 

[AmericanFirst1]

Accidental Republican candor about voter-ID laws

Jim DeMint, the former South Carolina senator and Tea Party firebrand who is now the president of the Heritage Foundation, became the latest in a string of conservatives to admit that restrictive voting laws such as voter ID requirements are an attempt to help Republicans win elections, telling a St. Louis radio host yesterday that voter ID laws help elect “more conservative candidates.”

“t’s something we’re working on all over the country because in the states where they do have voter ID laws you’ve seen, actually, elections begin to change towards more conservative candidates,” he said.

(Notice: He's not saying Republicans are trying to get more people to vote, they are trying to keep others from voting. That's what traitors do. People that know they have no policies to win by.)

Republicans Boast About Voter Suppression in Tampa, but the Ground Is Shifting

The bill’s author, state Representative Alan Clemmons, took the stand yesterday and admitted he cannot produce a single example of in-person voter impersonation, and also conceded his law wouldn’t really stop a dedicated impersonator anyhow. Then, one lawyer presented racist e-mails sent to Clemmons about voter-identification laws—with which Clemmons agreed. (Someone e-mailed Clemmons to denounce the idea that black voters wouldn’t sign up for photo identification if an incentive was offered, saying “it would be like a swarm of bees going after a watermelon.” Clemmons replied, “Amen, Ed, thank you for your support,” a response he admitted in court yesterday was “poorly considered.”)

Republicans Admit Voter-ID Laws Are Aimed at Democratic Voters

So we should be thankful for Schlafly’s candor. The more Republicans acknowledge that these laws are designed to suppress the votes of blacks, Latinos, and others, the easier building a movement to stop them will be.

Birth certificates ordinarily cost $22. The state offers ones costing $2 to $3 for election purposes, Justice Ginsburg wrote, but it had not publicized that option on the relevant website or on forms for requesting birth certificates.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/30/u...-voter-id-law-intact-with-a-warning.html?_r=0

“Even at $2, the toll is at odds with this court’s precedent,” she wrote, citinga 1966 decision striking down Virginia’s poll tax.



---------------------------------------------

Republicans think their traitorous and treacherous behavior is clever. But with just a 37% approval rating, they are digging their party's grave. Oh, the party isn't going away, but it will change so much, it will be like the 60's when all the liberals and moderates left and all the Confederates, the KKK, the Aryan Nation and all the other racists move into the GOP. The party has to change. The base doesn't like it's disastrous and disgraceful leadership. The GOP leadership is so bad, the base is embarrassed.

Your fail thread starts with a false premise; that voter IDs suppress voting.

As per always, you are a liar.

As she always is.

 

[rdean]

Accidental Republican candor about voter-ID laws

Jim DeMint, the former South Carolina senator and Tea Party firebrand who is now the president of the Heritage Foundation, became the latest in a string of conservatives to admit that restrictive voting laws such as voter ID requirements are an attempt to help Republicans win elections, telling a St. Louis radio host yesterday that voter ID laws help elect “more conservative candidates.”

“t’s something we’re working on all over the country because in the states where they do have voter ID laws you’ve seen, actually, elections begin to change towards more conservative candidates,” he said.

(Notice: He's not saying Republicans are trying to get more people to vote, they are trying to keep others from voting. That's what traitors do. People that know they have no policies to win by.)

Republicans Boast About Voter Suppression in Tampa, but the Ground Is Shifting

The bill’s author, state Representative Alan Clemmons, took the stand yesterday and admitted he cannot produce a single example of in-person voter impersonation, and also conceded his law wouldn’t really stop a dedicated impersonator anyhow. Then, one lawyer presented racist e-mails sent to Clemmons about voter-identification laws—with which Clemmons agreed. (Someone e-mailed Clemmons to denounce the idea that black voters wouldn’t sign up for photo identification if an incentive was offered, saying “it would be like a swarm of bees going after a watermelon.” Clemmons replied, “Amen, Ed, thank you for your support,” a response he admitted in court yesterday was “poorly considered.”)

Republicans Admit Voter-ID Laws Are Aimed at Democratic Voters

So we should be thankful for Schlafly’s candor. The more Republicans acknowledge that these laws are designed to suppress the votes of blacks, Latinos, and others, the easier building a movement to stop them will be.

Birth certificates ordinarily cost $22. The state offers ones costing $2 to $3 for election purposes, Justice Ginsburg wrote, but it had not publicized that option on the relevant website or on forms for requesting birth certificates.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/30/u...-voter-id-law-intact-with-a-warning.html?_r=0

“Even at $2, the toll is at odds with this court’s precedent,” she wrote, citinga 1966 decision striking down Virginia’s poll tax.



---------------------------------------------

Republicans think their traitorous and treacherous behavior is clever. But with just a 37% approval rating, they are digging their party's grave. Oh, the party isn't going away, but it will change so much, it will be like the 60's when all the liberals and moderates left and all the Confederates, the KKK, the Aryan Nation and all the other racists move into the GOP. The party has to change. The base doesn't like it's disastrous and disgraceful leadership. The GOP leadership is so bad, the base is embarrassed.

Your fail thread starts with a false premise; that voter IDs suppress voting.

As per always, you are a liar.

Voter ID is only a small part of it as I outlined. Funny, Supreme court justices, Republican leaders and so on are wrong. But you. A nothing, a belch, a nitwit is the only one who can see the truth.

 

[Dale Smith]

Accidental Republican candor about voter-ID laws

Jim DeMint, the former South Carolina senator and Tea Party firebrand who is now the president of the Heritage Foundation, became the latest in a string of conservatives to admit that restrictive voting laws such as voter ID requirements are an attempt to help Republicans win elections, telling a St. Louis radio host yesterday that voter ID laws help elect “more conservative candidates.”

“t’s something we’re working on all over the country because in the states where they do have voter ID laws you’ve seen, actually, elections begin to change towards more conservative candidates,” he said.

(Notice: He's not saying Republicans are trying to get more people to vote, they are trying to keep others from voting. That's what traitors do. People that know they have no policies to win by.)

Republicans Boast About Voter Suppression in Tampa, but the Ground Is Shifting

The bill’s author, state Representative Alan Clemmons, took the stand yesterday and admitted he cannot produce a single example of in-person voter impersonation, and also conceded his law wouldn’t really stop a dedicated impersonator anyhow. Then, one lawyer presented racist e-mails sent to Clemmons about voter-identification laws—with which Clemmons agreed. (Someone e-mailed Clemmons to denounce the idea that black voters wouldn’t sign up for photo identification if an incentive was offered, saying “it would be like a swarm of bees going after a watermelon.” Clemmons replied, “Amen, Ed, thank you for your support,” a response he admitted in court yesterday was “poorly considered.”)

Republicans Admit Voter-ID Laws Are Aimed at Democratic Voters

So we should be thankful for Schlafly’s candor. The more Republicans acknowledge that these laws are designed to suppress the votes of blacks, Latinos, and others, the easier building a movement to stop them will be.

Birth certificates ordinarily cost $22. The state offers ones costing $2 to $3 for election purposes, Justice Ginsburg wrote, but it had not publicized that option on the relevant website or on forms for requesting birth certificates.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/30/u...-voter-id-law-intact-with-a-warning.html?_r=0

“Even at $2, the toll is at odds with this court’s precedent,” she wrote, citinga 1966 decision striking down Virginia’s poll tax.



---------------------------------------------

Republicans think their traitorous and treacherous behavior is clever. But with just a 37% approval rating, they are digging their party's grave. Oh, the party isn't going away, but it will change so much, it will be like the 60's when all the liberals and moderates left and all the Confederates, the KKK, the Aryan Nation and all the other racists move into the GOP. The party has to change. The base doesn't like it's disastrous and disgraceful leadership. The GOP leadership is so bad, the base is embarrassed.

Your fail thread starts with a false premise; that voter IDs suppress voting.

As per always, you are a liar.

Voter ID is only a small part of it as I outlined. Funny, Supreme court justices, Republican leaders and so on are wrong. But you. A nothing, a belch, a nitwit is the only one who can see the truth.

redean SEZ????

"THOSE GOP'ERS ARE TYING TO KEEP THE PEOPLES FROM VOTING FOR LEFTARDS...ARRRRRGGGGGGHHHHHH!!!!"

 

[NYcarbineer]

This is how you do it:

Vermont Enacts Automatic Voter Registration

 

[Fair&Balanced]

This is how you do it:

Vermont Enacts Automatic Voter Registration

I hate the entire concept of registration. You show up to the polling place, you show ID, if you are in the correct precinct you vote. How hard is that?


Voter registration is an antiquated process.

 

[PredFan]

Accidental Republican candor about voter-ID laws

Jim DeMint, the former South Carolina senator and Tea Party firebrand who is now the president of the Heritage Foundation, became the latest in a string of conservatives to admit that restrictive voting laws such as voter ID requirements are an attempt to help Republicans win elections, telling a St. Louis radio host yesterday that voter ID laws help elect “more conservative candidates.”

“t’s something we’re working on all over the country because in the states where they do have voter ID laws you’ve seen, actually, elections begin to change towards more conservative candidates,” he said.

(Notice: He's not saying Republicans are trying to get more people to vote, they are trying to keep others from voting. That's what traitors do. People that know they have no policies to win by.)

Republicans Boast About Voter Suppression in Tampa, but the Ground Is Shifting

The bill’s author, state Representative Alan Clemmons, took the stand yesterday and admitted he cannot produce a single example of in-person voter impersonation, and also conceded his law wouldn’t really stop a dedicated impersonator anyhow. Then, one lawyer presented racist e-mails sent to Clemmons about voter-identification laws—with which Clemmons agreed. (Someone e-mailed Clemmons to denounce the idea that black voters wouldn’t sign up for photo identification if an incentive was offered, saying “it would be like a swarm of bees going after a watermelon.” Clemmons replied, “Amen, Ed, thank you for your support,” a response he admitted in court yesterday was “poorly considered.”)

Republicans Admit Voter-ID Laws Are Aimed at Democratic Voters

So we should be thankful for Schlafly’s candor. The more Republicans acknowledge that these laws are designed to suppress the votes of blacks, Latinos, and others, the easier building a movement to stop them will be.

Birth certificates ordinarily cost $22. The state offers ones costing $2 to $3 for election purposes, Justice Ginsburg wrote, but it had not publicized that option on the relevant website or on forms for requesting birth certificates.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/30/u...-voter-id-law-intact-with-a-warning.html?_r=0

“Even at $2, the toll is at odds with this court’s precedent,” she wrote, citinga 1966 decision striking down Virginia’s poll tax.



---------------------------------------------

Republicans think their traitorous and treacherous behavior is clever. But with just a 37% approval rating, they are digging their party's grave. Oh, the party isn't going away, but it will change so much, it will be like the 60's when all the liberals and moderates left and all the Confederates, the KKK, the Aryan Nation and all the other racists move into the GOP. The party has to change. The base doesn't like it's disastrous and disgraceful leadership. The GOP leadership is so bad, the base is embarrassed.

Your fail thread starts with a false premise; that voter IDs suppress voting.

As per always, you are a liar.

Voter ID is only a small part of it as I outlined. Funny, Supreme court justices, Republican leaders and so on are wrong. But you. A nothing, a belch, a nitwit is the only one who can see the truth.

You are as close to clarity as you have ever been, too bad for you that you aren't serious. Good luck next time.

 

[AmericanFirst1]

Accidental Republican candor about voter-ID laws

Jim DeMint, the former South Carolina senator and Tea Party firebrand who is now the president of the Heritage Foundation, became the latest in a string of conservatives to admit that restrictive voting laws such as voter ID requirements are an attempt to help Republicans win elections, telling a St. Louis radio host yesterday that voter ID laws help elect “more conservative candidates.”

“t’s something we’re working on all over the country because in the states where they do have voter ID laws you’ve seen, actually, elections begin to change towards more conservative candidates,” he said.

(Notice: He's not saying Republicans are trying to get more people to vote, they are trying to keep others from voting. That's what traitors do. People that know they have no policies to win by.)

Republicans Boast About Voter Suppression in Tampa, but the Ground Is Shifting

The bill’s author, state Representative Alan Clemmons, took the stand yesterday and admitted he cannot produce a single example of in-person voter impersonation, and also conceded his law wouldn’t really stop a dedicated impersonator anyhow. Then, one lawyer presented racist e-mails sent to Clemmons about voter-identification laws—with which Clemmons agreed. (Someone e-mailed Clemmons to denounce the idea that black voters wouldn’t sign up for photo identification if an incentive was offered, saying “it would be like a swarm of bees going after a watermelon.” Clemmons replied, “Amen, Ed, thank you for your support,” a response he admitted in court yesterday was “poorly considered.”)

Republicans Admit Voter-ID Laws Are Aimed at Democratic Voters

So we should be thankful for Schlafly’s candor. The more Republicans acknowledge that these laws are designed to suppress the votes of blacks, Latinos, and others, the easier building a movement to stop them will be.

Birth certificates ordinarily cost $22. The state offers ones costing $2 to $3 for election purposes, Justice Ginsburg wrote, but it had not publicized that option on the relevant website or on forms for requesting birth certificates.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/30/u...-voter-id-law-intact-with-a-warning.html?_r=0

“Even at $2, the toll is at odds with this court’s precedent,” she wrote, citinga 1966 decision striking down Virginia’s poll tax.



---------------------------------------------

Republicans think their traitorous and treacherous behavior is clever. But with just a 37% approval rating, they are digging their party's grave. Oh, the party isn't going away, but it will change so much, it will be like the 60's when all the liberals and moderates left and all the Confederates, the KKK, the Aryan Nation and all the other racists move into the GOP. The party has to change. The base doesn't like it's disastrous and disgraceful leadership. The GOP leadership is so bad, the base is embarrassed.

Your fail thread starts with a false premise; that voter IDs suppress voting.

As per always, you are a liar.

Voter ID is only a small part of it as I outlined. Funny, Supreme court justices, Republican leaders and so on are wrong. But you. A nothing, a belch, a nitwit is the only one who can see the truth.

No, they are right. But you, lying retarded lib leach don't like voter id because it stops illegal voting for the commie Dimwits. Voter ID is not a problem, liberalism is. Retard.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Geeze, I hope common sense makes a comeback soon. Id's say, "Yes, we are who we say we are". We whip those puppies out for a wide variety of things on a regular basis and never complain.
At the polls they say, "Yes, I am a citizen of this country who lives in this precinct, and that gives me the right to choose people I want to represent me. If you are not offended by having to use an ID to buy liquor, or drive a car, why would voting cause such angst? Unless you shouldn't be determining our leaders to begin with...

There is a reason why the Spanish don't vote in France, and the Russians don't vote in Canada. There is no reason on earth why Mexican citizens should be voting anywhere but Mexico. Nor should anyone temporarily seeking refuge in our country be able to determine the outcome of our elections. Do you vote much in Mexico, Somalia or Syria?

 

[AmericanFirst1]

Geeze, I hope common sense makes a comeback soon. Id's say, "Yes, we are who we say we are". We whip those puppies out for a wide variety of things on a regular basis and never complain.
At the polls they say, "Yes, I am a citizen of this country who lives in this precinct, and that gives me the right to choose people I want to represent me. If you are not offended by having to use an ID to buy liquor, or drive a car, why would voting cause such angst? Unless you shouldn't be determining our leaders to begin with...

There is a reason why the Spanish don't vote in France, and the Russians don't vote in Canada. There is no reason on earth why Mexican citizens should be voting anywhere but Mexico. Nor should anyone temporarily seeking refuge in our country be able to determine the outcome of our elections. Do you vote much in Mexico, Somalia or Syria?

Common sense doesn't sit well wth libs.

 

[PredFan]

No matter how many times you defeat the idiot liberals on any of this type of nonsense, they ignore it and just repeat the same ignorant garbage somewhere else. They are like the Retard Whack-A-Mole.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It's true, Deany. We're FIRMLY against giving the non-living the right to vote

 

[rdean]

Geeze, I hope common sense makes a comeback soon. Id's say, "Yes, we are who we say we are". We whip those puppies out for a wide variety of things on a regular basis and never complain.
At the polls they say, "Yes, I am a citizen of this country who lives in this precinct, and that gives me the right to choose people I want to represent me. If you are not offended by having to use an ID to buy liquor, or drive a car, why would voting cause such angst? Unless you shouldn't be determining our leaders to begin with...

There is a reason why the Spanish don't vote in France, and the Russians don't vote in Canada. There is no reason on earth why Mexican citizens should be voting anywhere but Mexico. Nor should anyone temporarily seeking refuge in our country be able to determine the outcome of our elections. Do you vote much in Mexico, Somalia or Syria?

Common sense doesn't sit well wth libs.

Republicans have somehow fooled themselves into believing their delusions are common sense. Like Trickle Down and "feed the poor and they will breed".

 

[The Irish Ram]

We are no more or less delusional than any one else in whatever party. Democrats are way ahead of Republicans in the racist arena. KKK and all.....
Let's try a different approach.
You explain to me why we are allowing non Americans to vote in American elections. Are there other countries where you can walk across the border and elect their officials, and if not, why not? Are there a lot of Americans crossing Germany's border to effect the outcome of their elections?
Why are you not complaining about having to pay for a piece of paper and a plastic card and proof of insurance to drive a car? That is much more complicated than what is required to vote.
Common sense would say, "Show the same ID you show everyone else for everything else." Democrats say, "Yeah, but then we wouldn't be able to sway the elections in our favor. Just let anyone that wants to,vote."
Then common sense would reply, "Just like they do in Italy, and Spain and Russia??"

It is why the globalists are flooding America with illegals to begin with. And why they want criminals in prison to vote. To turn our 2 party system into a one party rule. The Global Initiative Party. The UN system.

 

[Avatar4321]

Still upset that you lost the dead vote?

 

[Avatar4321]

Geeze, I hope common sense makes a comeback soon. Id's say, "Yes, we are who we say we are". We whip those puppies out for a wide variety of things on a regular basis and never complain.
At the polls they say, "Yes, I am a citizen of this country who lives in this precinct, and that gives me the right to choose people I want to represent me. If you are not offended by having to use an ID to buy liquor, or drive a car, why would voting cause such angst? Unless you shouldn't be determining our leaders to begin with...

There is a reason why the Spanish don't vote in France, and the Russians don't vote in Canada. There is no reason on earth why Mexican citizens should be voting anywhere but Mexico. Nor should anyone temporarily seeking refuge in our country be able to determine the outcome of our elections. Do you vote much in Mexico, Somalia or Syria?

Common sense doesn't sit well wth libs.

Republicans have somehow fooled themselves into believing their delusions are common sense. Like Trickle Down and "feed the poor and they will breed".

So people don't benefit when wealthy people spend money? If I make a million dollars and buy a yacht isn't the yacht builder thus employed and thus also benefiting from me making a million dollars? It's common sense because it's obvious that when I do well and hire others that they also benefit from me doing well. Especially when the labor we do to make money is already blessing people buy providing them with necessary goods and services.

As for feeding the poor and breeding, isn't that common sense as well? Do starving people usually screw each other?

 

[AmericanFirst1]

Geeze, I hope common sense makes a comeback soon. Id's say, "Yes, we are who we say we are". We whip those puppies out for a wide variety of things on a regular basis and never complain.
At the polls they say, "Yes, I am a citizen of this country who lives in this precinct, and that gives me the right to choose people I want to represent me. If you are not offended by having to use an ID to buy liquor, or drive a car, why would voting cause such angst? Unless you shouldn't be determining our leaders to begin with...

There is a reason why the Spanish don't vote in France, and the Russians don't vote in Canada. There is no reason on earth why Mexican citizens should be voting anywhere but Mexico. Nor should anyone temporarily seeking refuge in our country be able to determine the outcome of our elections. Do you vote much in Mexico, Somalia or Syria?

Common sense doesn't sit well wth libs.

Republicans have somehow fooled themselves into believing their delusions are common sense. Like Trickle Down and "feed the poor and they will breed".

Democraps have somehow fooled themselves into believing they are smarter than everyone else when in truth they are a bunch of retarded socialists. Retard!!!!