Even Man who measured Soviet assets on spy photo's speaks out on 9/11

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by creativedreams, Feb 15, 2010.

  1. creativedreams
    Offline

    creativedreams Weaver

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,165
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Ratings:
    +30
    Even a man who made measurements for the government on spy photo's of Russia military assets speak's out on 9/11 lies

    Also Aviation Pilots...

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vc3EZMuerWY"]YouTube- Real Pilots Speak Out on September 11th Lies 911[/ame]
     
  2. groupthink
    Offline

    groupthink BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Messages:
    234
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +7
    debunkers will post pics of burned coprses , as proof AA77 crashed into the pentagon.
     
  3. creativedreams
    Offline

    creativedreams Weaver

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,165
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Ratings:
    +30
    You mean all that evidence that was planted...........er........... found at the Pentagon that would easily fit in a pickup truck with every piece small enough for one man to carry.....also a plane identifier that looks like an article cut out of a newspaper?
    No seats
    No wing parts
    No tail fin parts
    1 out of ten rims
    1 out of two titanium engines
    Need I go on????
     
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2010
  4. Baruch Menachem
    Offline

    Baruch Menachem '

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    14,204
    Thanks Received:
    3,235
    Trophy Points:
    185
    Ratings:
    +3,305
    The thing with using an authority in a discussion, is he needs to be an authority on what is going on in the discussion. Otherwise, he is just one more guy at the other end of the bar spouting moonshine.

    It is not the position of authority which grants the authority to say"This is So," but his use of his expertise to explain his position.

    Einstein for example is often quoted in all kinds of contexts. Bright dude, knew a lot, explained a lot, and no one has been able to knock him down yet. But remember when he wrote his essay that made him famouse, he was not some tenured proff with a white coat and a sincure at a university. He was a low level postal clerk in the backwoods of Switzerland.
     
  5. creativedreams
    Offline

    creativedreams Weaver

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,165
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Ratings:
    +30
    True, yet many no names (average americans) are very bright and are so called "Truthers" and because they are just construction workers, plumbers, secretaries, etc......the "Anti-Truths" who search for any little shred to knock down the messengers and ignore the contents like to discredit their credentials to question, and call them names, etc.

    And when Engineers and Architects are brought up then the "Anti-Truths" raise the bar on trying to discredit them
     
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2010
  6. groupthink
    Offline

    groupthink BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Messages:
    234
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +7
    none of the resident debunkers assigned to "usmessageboard" going to post pics of the burned corpses as proof AA77 hit the pentagon?
     
  7. candycorn
    Offline

    candycorn Alis volat propriis

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    37,499
    Thanks Received:
    4,541
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +12,045
    You're alomst as pathtic as Maximus.
     
  8. Baruch Menachem
    Offline

    Baruch Menachem '

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2008
    Messages:
    14,204
    Thanks Received:
    3,235
    Trophy Points:
    185
    Ratings:
    +3,305
    Did you read what I wrote?
    It is the use of facts and expertise to explain, not the position of authority. Authority comes with your use of facts.

    Honest use of facts.
     
  9. creativedreams
    Offline

    creativedreams Weaver

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    1,165
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Ratings:
    +30
    If we had an honest use of facts in the first place we wouldn't have this debate.

    How about a new and honest use of facts in an investigation where we don't have 9/11 Commissioner's saying its a national scandal and end up resigning?

    How about a new and honest use of facts in an investigation where we don't have 9/11 Commissioner's saying they were stonewalled by the Whitehouse?

    How about a new and honest use of facts in an investigation where we don't have 9/11 Commissioner's saying they were constantly lied to by Military and CIA?

    How about a new and honest use of facts in an investigation where we don't have 9/11 Commissioner's saying we still don't know the truth about 9/11?
     
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2010
  10. candycorn
    Offline

    candycorn Alis volat propriis

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    37,499
    Thanks Received:
    4,541
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +12,045
    Aren't you the admitted liar about the socks you said you didn't have on the other message board? DO you have any on this baord?

    Don't you think that you, an admitted liar, is in no condition to talk about "honesty"?
     

Share This Page