namvet
Gold Member
hey buger boy he isn't a paulin, he actually finishes what he starts you fucking idiot
clearly you have ASS AND MOUTH DISEASE idiot
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
hey buger boy he isn't a paulin, he actually finishes what he starts you fucking idiot
LMAO!for most of his 2 terms , it was the pubs you fucking idiot, what's your point
Pelosi and Reid you cheese dick
for most of his 2 terms , it was the pubs you fucking idiot, what's your point
Seriously potter, ya' need to lay off the lil'man!hey buger boy he isn't a paulin, he actually finishes what he starts you fucking idiot
Bayh has said he loves being a chief executive, loves serving the people of Indiana, but does not love congress; and that there's a better way to serve. I think he is getting out so as not be stained by Obama and the very likely upcoming loss of his seat to Dan Coats. This will allow him to run for president without a loss, and as a new and a principled man. I've sent him lots of letters (the real thing, not emails) since the Ds took congress, especially since January 09, and I think he's received a lot just like mine, telling him he can't win re-election by going along with the current leadership. I'm sorry that there couldn't have been a Coats/Bayh contest. Coats held the seat before Bayh, and it was theorized at the time that he didn't stand for reelection because he believed he couldnt beat Bayh back in 1998. If Coats could've beaten Bayh in 10, I had hopes for him against Obama in 2012.
Bayh did become more of a supporter for small business, turning around a pro-small business rating from 80% against to 80% pro during his tenure.
( not that it matters; Bayh has a really beautiful wife)
I too think his goal is a run for the presidency, and retiring will allow him plenty of time to gather the behind-the-scene forces necessary to begin a campaign. But I don't think going against Obama is the reason. I've said before (started a whole thread about it) that I think it's more than a possibility that Obama won't run for a second term. He has made subtle references to that several times, the last time being during his recent interview with Diane Sawyer. Obama may want to go out the way LBJ did. There are a similar set of circumstances, to be sure.
HUH? Would that be Vietnam? War on Poverty? Other than a few leftwing and right wing nutters Obama isn't catching any flack for Iraq or Afghanistan. Indeed, he is trying to claim credit for the Iraq success. It appears the surge in Afghanistan may well be successful, if it is not he'll get credit for trying.
Now if it's reckless spending that is similar, you've got a point. Was that your point?
Keep dreaming, ain't gonna happen, Harry Reid is toast, you're mistaking what a handful of people are doing for something that is going to be supported by any significant portion of those of us that have been involved with Nevadan Tea Parties for a long time, trust me job#1 is to get rid of Harry Reid, it'll be either Lowden or Tarkanian in that seat in 2011.Not if the tea party and GOP have anything to do with it.
for most of his 2 terms , it was the pubs you fucking idiot, what's your point
Pelosi and Reid you cheese dick
I too think his goal is a run for the presidency, and retiring will allow him plenty of time to gather the behind-the-scene forces necessary to begin a campaign. But I don't think going against Obama is the reason. I've said before (started a whole thread about it) that I think it's more than a possibility that Obama won't run for a second term. He has made subtle references to that several times, the last time being during his recent interview with Diane Sawyer. Obama may want to go out the way LBJ did. There are a similar set of circumstances, to be sure.
HUH? Would that be Vietnam? War on Poverty? Other than a few leftwing and right wing nutters Obama isn't catching any flack for Iraq or Afghanistan. Indeed, he is trying to claim credit for the Iraq success. It appears the surge in Afghanistan may well be successful, if it is not he'll get credit for trying.
Now if it's reckless spending that is similar, you've got a point. Was that your point?
I don't consider trying to spend money on domestic priorities that had been dropped into a shithole for a decade as "reckless" for one thing. It's what he campaigned on and why he was elected. Unfortunately, by the end of his campaign, the entire economy came crashing down, so he had to try to balance it all out. As for the two wars, I can almost guarantee that if we aren't out of there by 2011, that problem will just add to his woes.
Barack Millstone Obama
PETER WEHNER - 02.15.2010 - 2:40 PM
The news that Democratic Senator Evan Bayh is retiring is another stunning blow for a Democratic party that is already reeling. This development — because of who Bayh is (perceived as a moderate/centrist); because of the state he represents (a traditionally Red one but won by Barack Obama in 2008); and because of his political situation (it was assumed he was in a comfortable position to win re-election) — will have significant ramifications. It will accelerate almost every bad trend for Democrats (more retirements, fewer entries into national races, more intra-party acrimony, and more panic)...
Rep. Marion Berry, yet another retiring Democrat, gave an interview to the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette a few weeks ago in which he recounted meetings with White House officials, reminiscent of some during the Clinton years, where he and others urged them not to force Blue Dogs “off into that swamp” of supporting bills that would be unpopular with voters back home. “I’ve been doing that with this White House, and they just don’t seem to give it any credibility at all,” Berry said. “They just kept telling us how good it was going to be. The president himself, when that was brought up in one group, said, ‘Well, the big difference here and in ’94 was you’ve got me.’ We’re going to see how much difference that makes now.”
We shall indeed. The big difference between now and 1994 is that Democrats have Obama instead of Clinton as the head of their party. And that may turn out to be very bad news for Democrats. The Democratic party is in worse shape now than it was at a comparable period then. The mistrust of government runs deeper. The anti-incumbent tide is stronger. And the public uprising is greater...
for most of his 2 terms , it was the pubs you fucking idiot, what's your point
Pelosi and Reid you cheese dick
Why don't you return to playing with yours and leave politics to the adults, pond scum.
if you can't discuss this without acting like children, the kiddies table is open now. eitherr keep it civil or move it there. questions?
http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-flame-zone/105667-namvet-and-potter-disprove-evolution.html
if you can't discuss this without acting like children, the kiddies table is open now. eitherr keep it civil or move it there. questions?
http://www.usmessageboard.com/the-flame-zone/105667-namvet-and-potter-disprove-evolution.html
then shut him up or ill sling his sorry ass !!!!
you won't be doing anything here for awhile, tough guy
I think we have the power of the People to thank for that. The Tea Party movement is more powerful than what its critics want to admit.How could a Super Majority = Monumental Failure? Only a Democrat could pull that one off. Worst U.S. Congress in history? You bet.