Stephanie
Diamond Member
- Jul 11, 2004
- 70,230
- 10,864
- 2,040
agree. my guy and I aren't married and we can get most of the perks married folks do. when he had Open heart surgery, we just signed a paper stating I'm his person to go to. If they have a living will and insurance, etc. Any person can be protectedI've always supported civil unions. I thought they deserved the government perks of marriage. Even though they could legally do so through a will and testament.No, redefining marriage is perverse. When a civil union would've done the same thing.Twisting the issue like you do is perverse.Damn stop using words that have no meaning, there is nothing perverse.
But if they had settled for civil unions they couldn't go after the churches.
The social cons across the nation wouldn't allow civil unions b/c it was too close to marriage for their liking. Civil unions only became popular with them when they started losing the marriage debate.