EPA poised to formally repeal Clean Power Plan in major blow to Obama’s climate legacy



Ahhh! That Donald Trump! Just when you don't think you can love him any more, he turns around and kicks Obama and the Left squarely hard in the nuts, again!

IF ONLY they could find just a HINT of wrongdoing to impeach him with!



Not-just-spectacle-or-stunt-is-Jackass-art_gallery_primary.jpg
 
P
They no lo
getimage-idx


Pittsburgh thanks you for bringing back the good ole winning days.
They no longer have the industry to generate that level of pollution. The new Pittsburgh is in China.
View attachment 153023
Pittsburgh thanks Drumpf for keeping their air clean.

Clean Air for Pittsburgh
Sixth in the nation? Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeiiit. Compared with the rest of the world...the air quality in the US is aces. Even Paris has worse air quality than LA and Pittsburgh doesn't even rate.

Pant by numbers: the cities with the most dangerous air – listed
 
WINNING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


The Environmental Protection Agency is expected to soon formally repeal the Clean Power Plan (CPP) in what would be one of the biggest blows yet to former President Barack Obama’s legacy on climate change.

A draft proposal of the EPA’s conclusions, leaked to news outlets over the past 24 hours, argues that the plan — which would limit carbon emissions from power plants and, in the process, drastically reduce the amount of coal-generated electricity in the U.S. — goes beyond the bounds of federal law and unnecessarily hikes energy prices for consumers.

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

“The EPA is proposing to repeal the CPP in its entirety,” the agency says in its draft conclusion.

Excellent!
 
WINNING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


The Environmental Protection Agency is expected to soon formally repeal the Clean Power Plan (CPP) in what would be one of the biggest blows yet to former President Barack Obama’s legacy on climate change.

A draft proposal of the EPA’s conclusions, leaked to news outlets over the past 24 hours, argues that the plan — which would limit carbon emissions from power plants and, in the process, drastically reduce the amount of coal-generated electricity in the U.S. — goes beyond the bounds of federal law and unnecessarily hikes energy prices for consumers.

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

“The EPA is proposing to repeal the CPP in its entirety,” the agency says in its draft conclusion.
This is just a dog and pony show for the base, and a handout to the fossil fuel industry. It will be "repeal and replace", not just repeal. And it will be replaced by much of the same content, and just rebranded.
 
getimage-idx


Pittsburgh thanks you for bringing back the good ole winning days.


Ummmm...that's not from CO2. Moron.
Where do you see anything about CO2 moron?


OP>>>>>>>A draft proposal of the EPA’s conclusions, leaked to news outlets over the past 24 hours, argues that the plan — which would limit carbon emissions from power plants and, in the process, drastically reduce the amount of coal-generated electricity in the U.S. — goes beyond the bounds of federal law and unnecessarily hikes energy prices for consumers.


MORON.
 
getimage-idx


Pittsburgh thanks you for bringing back the good ole winning days.


Ummmm...that's not from CO2. Moron.
Where do you see anything about CO2 moron?


OP>>>>>>>A draft proposal of the EPA’s conclusions, leaked to news outlets over the past 24 hours, argues that the plan — which would limit carbon emissions from power plants and, in the process, drastically reduce the amount of coal-generated electricity in the U.S. — goes beyond the bounds of federal law and unnecessarily hikes energy prices for consumers.


MORON.
From the actual fact sheet for the act:

"
  • From the soot and smog reductions alone, for every dollar invested through the Clean Power Plan—American families will see up to $7 in health benefits.
  • The Clean Power Plan will reduce pollutants that contribute to the soot and smog that make people sick by over 25 percent in 2030.
    • 54,000 to 56,000 tons of PM2.5
    • 424,000 to 471,000 tons of sulfur dioxide
    • 407,000 to 428,000 tons of nitrogen dioxide
In other words, it was supposed to do a lot more than just limit carbon emissions. so settle down.
 
getimage-idx


Pittsburgh thanks you for bringing back the good ole winning days.


Ummmm...that's not from CO2. Moron.
Where do you see anything about CO2 moron?


OP>>>>>>>A draft proposal of the EPA’s conclusions, leaked to news outlets over the past 24 hours, argues that the plan — which would limit carbon emissions from power plants and, in the process, drastically reduce the amount of coal-generated electricity in the U.S. — goes beyond the bounds of federal law and unnecessarily hikes energy prices for consumers.


MORON.
From the actual fact sheet for the act:

"
  • From the soot and smog reductions alone, for every dollar invested through the Clean Power Plan—American families will see up to $7 in health benefits.
  • The Clean Power Plan will reduce pollutants that contribute to the soot and smog that make people sick by over 25 percent in 2030.
    • 54,000 to 56,000 tons of PM2.5
    • 424,000 to 471,000 tons of sulfur dioxide
    • 407,000 to 428,000 tons of nitrogen dioxide
In other words, it was supposed to do a lot more than just limit carbon emissions. so settle down.

From the soot and smog reductions alone, for every dollar invested through the Clean Power Plan—American families will see up to $7 in health benefits.

I heard it was going to save every family $2500 a year on their premiums.

In other words, it was supposed to do a lot more than just limit carbon emissions.

I agree.
It was going to increase the cost of electricity, make our power grid less stable and weaken our economy.
 
getimage-idx


Pittsburgh thanks you for bringing back the good ole winning days.


Ummmm...that's not from CO2. Moron.
Where do you see anything about CO2 moron?


OP>>>>>>>A draft proposal of the EPA’s conclusions, leaked to news outlets over the past 24 hours, argues that the plan — which would limit carbon emissions from power plants and, in the process, drastically reduce the amount of coal-generated electricity in the U.S. — goes beyond the bounds of federal law and unnecessarily hikes energy prices for consumers.


MORON.
From the actual fact sheet for the act:

"
  • From the soot and smog reductions alone, for every dollar invested through the Clean Power Plan—American families will see up to $7 in health benefits.
  • The Clean Power Plan will reduce pollutants that contribute to the soot and smog that make people sick by over 25 percent in 2030.
    • 54,000 to 56,000 tons of PM2.5
    • 424,000 to 471,000 tons of sulfur dioxide
    • 407,000 to 428,000 tons of nitrogen dioxide
In other words, it was supposed to do a lot more than just limit carbon emissions. so settle down.

From the soot and smog reductions alone, for every dollar invested through the Clean Power Plan—American families will see up to $7 in health benefits.

I heard it was going to save every family $2500 a year on their premiums.

In other words, it was supposed to do a lot more than just limit carbon emissions.

I agree.
It was going to increase the cost of electricity, make our power grid less stable and weaken our economy.
Yes, I'm sure that's the conclusion you reached after your extensive research. ;)
 
getimage-idx


Pittsburgh thanks you for bringing back the good ole winning days.


Ummmm...that's not from CO2. Moron.
Where do you see anything about CO2 moron?


OP>>>>>>>A draft proposal of the EPA’s conclusions, leaked to news outlets over the past 24 hours, argues that the plan — which would limit carbon emissions from power plants and, in the process, drastically reduce the amount of coal-generated electricity in the U.S. — goes beyond the bounds of federal law and unnecessarily hikes energy prices for consumers.


MORON.
From the actual fact sheet for the act:

"
  • From the soot and smog reductions alone, for every dollar invested through the Clean Power Plan—American families will see up to $7 in health benefits.
  • The Clean Power Plan will reduce pollutants that contribute to the soot and smog that make people sick by over 25 percent in 2030.
    • 54,000 to 56,000 tons of PM2.5
    • 424,000 to 471,000 tons of sulfur dioxide
    • 407,000 to 428,000 tons of nitrogen dioxide
In other words, it was supposed to do a lot more than just limit carbon emissions. so settle down.

That's EPA bullshit. The clean power plan would cost American families hundreds of dollars every year, if not thousands.

Name one person who a doctor diagnosed as "sick from air pollution."
 
getimage-idx


Pittsburgh thanks you for bringing back the good ole winning days.


Ummmm...that's not from CO2. Moron.
Where do you see anything about CO2 moron?


OP>>>>>>>A draft proposal of the EPA’s conclusions, leaked to news outlets over the past 24 hours, argues that the plan — which would limit carbon emissions from power plants and, in the process, drastically reduce the amount of coal-generated electricity in the U.S. — goes beyond the bounds of federal law and unnecessarily hikes energy prices for consumers.


MORON.
From the actual fact sheet for the act:

"
  • From the soot and smog reductions alone, for every dollar invested through the Clean Power Plan—American families will see up to $7 in health benefits.
  • The Clean Power Plan will reduce pollutants that contribute to the soot and smog that make people sick by over 25 percent in 2030.
    • 54,000 to 56,000 tons of PM2.5
    • 424,000 to 471,000 tons of sulfur dioxide
    • 407,000 to 428,000 tons of nitrogen dioxide
In other words, it was supposed to do a lot more than just limit carbon emissions. so settle down.

That's EPA bullshit. The clean power plan would cost American families hundreds of dollars every year, if not thousands.

Name one person who a doctor diagnosed as "sick from air pollution."
Why? It's not my job to introduce you to reality . Look it up yourself.
 
Ummmm...that's not from CO2. Moron.
Where do you see anything about CO2 moron?


OP>>>>>>>A draft proposal of the EPA’s conclusions, leaked to news outlets over the past 24 hours, argues that the plan — which would limit carbon emissions from power plants and, in the process, drastically reduce the amount of coal-generated electricity in the U.S. — goes beyond the bounds of federal law and unnecessarily hikes energy prices for consumers.


MORON.
From the actual fact sheet for the act:

"
  • From the soot and smog reductions alone, for every dollar invested through the Clean Power Plan—American families will see up to $7 in health benefits.
  • The Clean Power Plan will reduce pollutants that contribute to the soot and smog that make people sick by over 25 percent in 2030.
    • 54,000 to 56,000 tons of PM2.5
    • 424,000 to 471,000 tons of sulfur dioxide
    • 407,000 to 428,000 tons of nitrogen dioxide
In other words, it was supposed to do a lot more than just limit carbon emissions. so settle down.

From the soot and smog reductions alone, for every dollar invested through the Clean Power Plan—American families will see up to $7 in health benefits.

I heard it was going to save every family $2500 a year on their premiums.

In other words, it was supposed to do a lot more than just limit carbon emissions.

I agree.
It was going to increase the cost of electricity, make our power grid less stable and weaken our economy.
Yes, I'm sure that's the conclusion you reached after your extensive research. ;)

Experience with liberal schemes.
 
Where do you see anything about CO2 moron?


OP>>>>>>>A draft proposal of the EPA’s conclusions, leaked to news outlets over the past 24 hours, argues that the plan — which would limit carbon emissions from power plants and, in the process, drastically reduce the amount of coal-generated electricity in the U.S. — goes beyond the bounds of federal law and unnecessarily hikes energy prices for consumers.


MORON.
From the actual fact sheet for the act:

"
  • From the soot and smog reductions alone, for every dollar invested through the Clean Power Plan—American families will see up to $7 in health benefits.
  • The Clean Power Plan will reduce pollutants that contribute to the soot and smog that make people sick by over 25 percent in 2030.
    • 54,000 to 56,000 tons of PM2.5
    • 424,000 to 471,000 tons of sulfur dioxide
    • 407,000 to 428,000 tons of nitrogen dioxide
In other words, it was supposed to do a lot more than just limit carbon emissions. so settle down.

From the soot and smog reductions alone, for every dollar invested through the Clean Power Plan—American families will see up to $7 in health benefits.

I heard it was going to save every family $2500 a year on their premiums.

In other words, it was supposed to do a lot more than just limit carbon emissions.

I agree.
It was going to increase the cost of electricity, make our power grid less stable and weaken our economy.
Yes, I'm sure that's the conclusion you reached after your extensive research. ;)

Experience with liberal schemes.
Beats having an actual education, right?
 
OP>>>>>>>A draft proposal of the EPA’s conclusions, leaked to news outlets over the past 24 hours, argues that the plan — which would limit carbon emissions from power plants and, in the process, drastically reduce the amount of coal-generated electricity in the U.S. — goes beyond the bounds of federal law and unnecessarily hikes energy prices for consumers.


MORON.
From the actual fact sheet for the act:

"
  • From the soot and smog reductions alone, for every dollar invested through the Clean Power Plan—American families will see up to $7 in health benefits.
  • The Clean Power Plan will reduce pollutants that contribute to the soot and smog that make people sick by over 25 percent in 2030.
    • 54,000 to 56,000 tons of PM2.5
    • 424,000 to 471,000 tons of sulfur dioxide
    • 407,000 to 428,000 tons of nitrogen dioxide
In other words, it was supposed to do a lot more than just limit carbon emissions. so settle down.

From the soot and smog reductions alone, for every dollar invested through the Clean Power Plan—American families will see up to $7 in health benefits.

I heard it was going to save every family $2500 a year on their premiums.

In other words, it was supposed to do a lot more than just limit carbon emissions.

I agree.
It was going to increase the cost of electricity, make our power grid less stable and weaken our economy.
Yes, I'm sure that's the conclusion you reached after your extensive research. ;)

Experience with liberal schemes.
Beats having an actual education, right?

Wrong, liberal schemes are much worse than having an education.

If Americans were better educated, there'd be many fewer liberal politicians and fewer liberal schemes.
 
They no lo
getimage-idx


Pittsburgh thanks you for bringing back the good ole winning days.
They no longer have the industry to generate that level of pollution. The new Pittsburgh is in China.
View attachment 153023
Pittsburgh thanks Drumpf for keeping their air clean.

Clean Air for Pittsburgh
Its fun watching you libtards self-destruct..

Our current scrubbing technologies will never allow a return to those days. We know how to remove particulates and other items from our smoke stacks. Too bad that you scaremongers cant even be honest about the basics..
 
Ummmm...that's not from CO2. Moron.
Where do you see anything about CO2 moron?


OP>>>>>>>A draft proposal of the EPA’s conclusions, leaked to news outlets over the past 24 hours, argues that the plan — which would limit carbon emissions from power plants and, in the process, drastically reduce the amount of coal-generated electricity in the U.S. — goes beyond the bounds of federal law and unnecessarily hikes energy prices for consumers.


MORON.
From the actual fact sheet for the act:

"
  • From the soot and smog reductions alone, for every dollar invested through the Clean Power Plan—American families will see up to $7 in health benefits.
  • The Clean Power Plan will reduce pollutants that contribute to the soot and smog that make people sick by over 25 percent in 2030.
    • 54,000 to 56,000 tons of PM2.5
    • 424,000 to 471,000 tons of sulfur dioxide
    • 407,000 to 428,000 tons of nitrogen dioxide
In other words, it was supposed to do a lot more than just limit carbon emissions. so settle down.

That's EPA bullshit. The clean power plan would cost American families hundreds of dollars every year, if not thousands.

Name one person who a doctor diagnosed as "sick from air pollution."
Why? It's not my job to introduce you to reality . Look it up yourself.

I have looked it up. There are no such cases. That's reality.
 
From the actual fact sheet for the act:

"
  • From the soot and smog reductions alone, for every dollar invested through the Clean Power Plan—American families will see up to $7 in health benefits.
  • The Clean Power Plan will reduce pollutants that contribute to the soot and smog that make people sick by over 25 percent in 2030.
    • 54,000 to 56,000 tons of PM2.5
    • 424,000 to 471,000 tons of sulfur dioxide
    • 407,000 to 428,000 tons of nitrogen dioxide
In other words, it was supposed to do a lot more than just limit carbon emissions. so settle down.

From the soot and smog reductions alone, for every dollar invested through the Clean Power Plan—American families will see up to $7 in health benefits.

I heard it was going to save every family $2500 a year on their premiums.

In other words, it was supposed to do a lot more than just limit carbon emissions.

I agree.
It was going to increase the cost of electricity, make our power grid less stable and weaken our economy.
Yes, I'm sure that's the conclusion you reached after your extensive research. ;)

Experience with liberal schemes.
Beats having an actual education, right?

Wrong, liberal schemes are much worse than having an education.

If Americans were better educated, there'd be many fewer liberal politicians and fewer liberal schemes.
Right.... yet, the more educated a person, the more likely he is liberal. Odd that reality does not match up with the thoughts flowing from your colon. Wait, no it isnt...
 
Where do you see anything about CO2 moron?


OP>>>>>>>A draft proposal of the EPA’s conclusions, leaked to news outlets over the past 24 hours, argues that the plan — which would limit carbon emissions from power plants and, in the process, drastically reduce the amount of coal-generated electricity in the U.S. — goes beyond the bounds of federal law and unnecessarily hikes energy prices for consumers.


MORON.
From the actual fact sheet for the act:

"
  • From the soot and smog reductions alone, for every dollar invested through the Clean Power Plan—American families will see up to $7 in health benefits.
  • The Clean Power Plan will reduce pollutants that contribute to the soot and smog that make people sick by over 25 percent in 2030.
    • 54,000 to 56,000 tons of PM2.5
    • 424,000 to 471,000 tons of sulfur dioxide
    • 407,000 to 428,000 tons of nitrogen dioxide
In other words, it was supposed to do a lot more than just limit carbon emissions. so settle down.

That's EPA bullshit. The clean power plan would cost American families hundreds of dollars every year, if not thousands.

Name one person who a doctor diagnosed as "sick from air pollution."
Why? It's not my job to introduce you to reality . Look it up yourself.

I have looked it up. There are no such cases. That's reality.
You looked up nothing. You are making things up, and your standard is absurd anyway. You have no idea what you are talking about, and doctors will continue to follow the recommendations of medical societies over blog-educated nonexperts like you.
 
From the soot and smog reductions alone, for every dollar invested through the Clean Power Plan—American families will see up to $7 in health benefits.

I heard it was going to save every family $2500 a year on their premiums.

In other words, it was supposed to do a lot more than just limit carbon emissions.

I agree.
It was going to increase the cost of electricity, make our power grid less stable and weaken our economy.
Yes, I'm sure that's the conclusion you reached after your extensive research. ;)

Experience with liberal schemes.
Beats having an actual education, right?

Wrong, liberal schemes are much worse than having an education.

If Americans were better educated, there'd be many fewer liberal politicians and fewer liberal schemes.
Right.... yet, the more educated a person, the more likely he is liberal. Odd that reality does not match up with the thoughts flowing from your colon. Wait, no it isnt...


Yea, they are so educated they don't know how to vote in midterms.
 

Forum List

Back
Top