EPA: Environmental Protection Agency

No, they promulgate junk science. That's what's so funny, the irony of them promulgating junk science while pretending to oppose it.

Free_Pass01.gif


...:bye1:
 
Trump names Scott Pruitt, Oklahoma attorney general suing EPA on climate change, to head the EPA
9 / 26
e151e5.gif
BBbyiSL.img

The Washington Post
Chris Mooney, Brady Dennis, Steven Mufson 4 hrs ago

President-elect Donald Trump on Thursday nominated Scott Pruitt, the attorney general of the oil and gas-intensive state of Oklahoma, to head the Environmental Protection Agency, a move signaling an assault on President Obama’s climate change and environmental legacy.



Pruitt has spent much of his energy as attorney general fighting the very agency he is being nominated to lead.

He is the third of Trump’s nominees who have key philosophical differences with the missions of the agencies they have been tapped to run. Ben Carson, named to head the Department of Housing and Urban Development, has expressed a deep aversion to the social safety net programs and fair housing initiatives that have been central to that agency’s activities. Betsy DeVos, named education secretary, has a passion for private school vouchers that critics say undercut the public school systems at the core of the government’s mission.

AAliswx.img


Trump’s transition team announced the nomination in a news release Thursday, calling Pruitt “an expert in Constitutional law” and saying he “brings a deep understanding of the impact of regulations on both the environment and the economy.”

“For too long, the Environmental Protection Agency has spent taxpayer dollars on an out-of-control anti-energy agenda that has destroyed millions of jobs, while also undermining our incredible farmers and many other businesses and industries at every turn,” the release quoted Trump as saying. He said Pruitt “will reverse this trend and restore the EPA’s essential mission of keeping our air and our water clean and safe.” Trump added, “My administration “strongly believes in environmental protection, and Scott Pruitt will be a powerful advocate for that mission while promoting jobs, safety and opportunity.”

Pruitt was quoted as saying: “The American people are tired of seeing billions of dollars drained from our economy due to unnecessary EPA regulations, and I intend to run this agency in a way that fosters both responsible protection of the environment and freedom for American businesses.”

Pruitt, who has written that the debate on climate change is “far from settled,” joined a coalition of state attorneys general in suing the agency’s Clean Power Plan, the principal Obama-era policy aimed at reducing U.S. greenhouse gas emissions from the electricity sector. He has also sued, with fellow state attorneys general, over the EPA’s recently announced regulations seeking to curtail the emissions of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas, from the oil and gas sector.

...

Trump names Scott Pruitt, Oklahoma attorney general suing EPA on climate change, to head the EPA
 
So, I guess I can assume that Mr Jihad here approves of this choice. Does Mr Jihad believe that the environment needs no protection from the activities of man? Was the smog and acid rain of years past a fabrication? Love Canal never happened. The Exxon Valdez spill (and many worse) were blown completely out of proportion. Is that right Mr Jihad? Is that what you think?

If not, tell us what you do think? Do we need the EPA or has the EPA been the enemy of the American people all these years?
 

Forum List

Back
Top