EPA BANNING ELECTRIC CARS and POWER GENERATION....

[jc456]

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

Not that you will read that, or are even capable of understanding what it says. But it is a site from the largest Scientific Society in the world, the American Institute of physics.

And there you go, again you provide a document that shows:

"Experts could dismiss the hypothesis because they found Arrhenius's calculation implausible on many grounds. In the first place, he had grossly oversimplified the climate system. Among other things, he had failed to consider how cloudiness might change if the Earth got a little warmer and more humid. A still weightier objection came from a simple laboratory measurement. A few years after Arrhenius published his hypothesis, another scientist in Sweden, Knut Ångström, asked an assistant to measure the passage of infrared radiation through a tube filled with carbon dioxide. The assistant ("Herr J. Koch," otherwise unrecorded in history) put in rather less of the gas in total than would be found in a column of air reaching to the top of the atmosphere. The assistant reported that the amount of radiation that got through the tube scarcely changed when he cut the quantity of gas back by a third. Apparently it took only a trace of the gas to "saturate" the absorption — that is, in the bands of the spectrum where CO2 blocked radiation, it did it so thoroughly that more gas could make little (7*)"

I appreciate that you keep proving my point, now where is the one that proves yours?

 

[jc456]

The insanity of the Liberal mind will not be at peace until each and every one of us is living in grass huts.

no, they want us all gone. They want to kill us!!!!

 

[jc456]

Billy,

Whether or not the ozone at ground level is a threat and whether or not the Obama administration wants to lower the allowed levels, your characterization of them and their motives is completely off the track.

prove him wrong then, he aske already and you again didn't. per your course.

 

[jc456]

Republicans make up the science they want to believe. Only, it's no longer science. It's "science fiction".

Poor little alarmist wont debate the facts presented they just wanna cry and call names..... Ok moron show me where im wrong...

How about we start with your title.

EPA BANNING ELECTRIC CARS and POWER GENERATION....

They have done no such thing.

now you're fooling around right? You really understand and are just acting st00pid, right?

 

[Billy_Bob]

Republicans make up the science they want to believe. Only, it's no longer science. It's "science fiction".

Poor little alarmist wont debate the facts presented they just wanna cry and call names..... Ok moron show me where im wrong...

How about we start with your title.

EPA BANNING ELECTRIC CARS and POWER GENERATION....

They have done no such thing.

Lets start with NATURALLY OCCURRING shall we? How are we to get levels below what is naturally occurring. Lets start with that fact shall we?

Then we can discuss how power and radiated fields create O-Zone.. If they want levels below what nature creates then anything man does is now against the law..

This is what i call the F-ing moron principal.. Its when alarmists fail to use critical thinking skills and do stupid ass shit!

 

[Crick]

This rule was first proposed January 19, 2010.

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-01-19/pdf/2010-340.pdf

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 50 and 58
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2005–0172; FRL–9102–1]
RIN 2060–AP98
National Ambient Air Quality
Standards for Ozone
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: Based on its reconsideration of the primary and secondary national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone (O3) set in March 2008, EPA proposes to set different primary and secondary standards than those set in 2008 to provide requisite protection of public health and welfare, respectively. With regard to the primary standard for O3, EPA proposes that the level of the 8-hour primary standard, which was set at 0.075 ppm in the 2008 final rule, should instead be set at a lower level within the range of 0.060 to 0.070 parts per million (ppm), to provide increased protection for children and other ‘‘at risk’’ populations against an array of O3-related adverse health effects that range from decreased lung function and increased respiratory symptoms to serious indicators of respiratory morbidity including emergency department visits and hospital admissions for respiratory causes, and possibly cardiovascular-related morbidity as well as total non-accidental and cardiopulmonary mortality. With regard to the secondary standard for O3, EPA proposes that the secondary O3 standard, which was set identical to the revised primary standard in the 2008 final rule, should instead be a new cumulative, seasonal standard expressed as an annual index of the sum of weighted hourly concentrations, cumulated over 12 hours per day (8 am to 8 pm) during the consecutive 3-month period within the O3 season with the maximum index value, set at a level within the range of 7 to 15 ppm-hours, to provide increased protection against O3-related adverse impacts on vegetation and forested ecosystems.

Fact Sheet

http://www.epa.gov/groundlevelozone/pdfs/fs20100106std.pdf

 

[Crick]

The Regulatory Impact Analysis

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/ecas/regdata/RIAs/s1-supplemental_analysis_summary11-5-09.pdf

 

[Politico]

now you're fooling around right? You really understand and are just acting st00pid, right?

I know the difference between a 0 and an O so.....