END OF THE WORLD!! Obama supporters alter Perceptions!

Discussion in 'Politics' started by healthmyths, Jan 18, 2012.

  1. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,227
    Thanks Received:
    2,044
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,850
    The end is here because I've read it all!

    Environmentalist/Obama supporters would rather have 1 million barrels be spilled in the ocean then agree with Keystone pipeline!

    It's true!

    Consider what they would rather happen!
    They'd rather have 1 million barrels of oil floating on 20,000 miles of ocean if another Exxon Valdez occurred carrying the daily shipment to China then admit the Keystone pipeline was safer!

    WHY???
    I can't explain it!

    What is UP is now down.
    What is black is now white.

    Environmentalists/Obama supporters rather another Exxon Valdez then a pipeline!

    PLEASE someone explain!!!
     
  2. Truthseeker420
    Offline

    Truthseeker420 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2011
    Messages:
    10,365
    Thanks Received:
    980
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Location:
    Home of the 2013 BCS National Champion
    Ratings:
    +1,026
    Obama haters are getting desperate.
     
  3. Robodoon
    Offline

    Robodoon Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2012
    Messages:
    1,034
    Thanks Received:
    113
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +113
    Well you are explaining the political correctness of politics. Political Correctness comes from the power elites who want the US destroyed. And so they are doing it.

    You know common sense isn't politically correct at all.

    Actually its part of the elites design to take down the USA, just like their created UN Agenda 21.

    They want a 3rd world US....you see the AAE, or the Banksters or the BOD, or the elites, all one in the same, need the US taken down, so they can promote the plans for the world under their rule.

    See, Rockefeller said it long ago.

    David Rockefeller Baden-Baden, Germany 1991
     
  4. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,227
    Thanks Received:
    2,044
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,850

    AH... so it was never about the environment!
    It was power!
    Logic/rational discussion facts... all are meaningless !

    NOT sure I like that world!
     
  5. francoHFW
    Offline

    francoHFW Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2011
    Messages:
    33,427
    Thanks Received:
    2,173
    Trophy Points:
    1,115
    Location:
    NY 26th FINALLY DEM!
    Ratings:
    +5,589
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2012
  6. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,537
    Thanks Received:
    8,161
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,153
    who exactly hates Obama?
     
  7. francoHFW
    Offline

    francoHFW Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2011
    Messages:
    33,427
    Thanks Received:
    2,173
    Trophy Points:
    1,115
    Location:
    NY 26th FINALLY DEM!
    Ratings:
    +5,589
    You are incredibly brainwashed Fox/Rush/Pub dupes...

    Chicago
    President Obama announced Wednesday he is putting the controversial Keystone XL oil pipeline expansion project on hold, saying a decision can’t be made by the February deadline imposed by Congress. While environmental groups cheered the news, the setback is temporary and the pipeline operator says it will resubmit plans to have the pipeline running in 2014.

    Skip to next paragraph Related stories
    What the Keystone XL pipeline would mean for the USWhite House may reject oil pipeline, Feb. deadline 'purely political' Keystone XL pipeline: a jobs coup for Republicans in tax deal? Keystone XL pipeline delayed: Does that help Obama? Topics
    Oil Pipelines Oil and Gas Storage and Transportation Pipeline Transportation Natural Gas Pipelines Diplomacy International Relations Political Policy The decision to deny the company its permit, issued through the US State Department, is considered a political risk by the president with Republican leaders saying that preventing the pipeline – proposed to be the largest of its kind in North American – is harmful to the national interest by limiting energy security and preventing job creation.

    The Obama administration was first expected to rule on the permit, sought by operator TransCanada of Alberta, Canada, by late December. However, the administration sought a one-year extension, saying a more thorough environmental assessment was needed, including further exploration of alternate routes.

    Republicans in Congress, in return for their support for an extension of the payroll tax holiday, forced the new Feb. 21 deadline, a date that Mr. Obama on Wednesday called “rushed and arbitrary.”

    What the Keystone XL pipeline would mean for the US

    His statement stressed the decision was not a ruling on the merits of the pipeline, but on the action of Congress, which he said, “prevented the State Department from gathering the information necessary to approve the project and protect the American people.”

    “I’m disappointed that Republicans in Congress forced this decision, but it does not change my administration’s commitment to American-made energy that creates jobs and reduces our dependence on oil,” he said.

    Obama puts Keystone pipeline on hold, decries 'rushed and arbitrary' deadline - CSMonitor.com
     
  8. occupied
    Offline

    occupied Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2011
    Messages:
    16,407
    Thanks Received:
    2,247
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +5,732
    There are no good guys in petro-politics, any argument that tries to paint anything involved as a net benefit to society is a lie. The greater good never even enters into any equation. Sit back and quit worrying, the deepest pockets will win, they always win. Asia will get their Canadian oil and the oil companies will be happy, all they have to do is convince everyone involved that they will not be irresponsible environment rapists as usual.
     
  9. TruthSeeker56
    Offline

    TruthSeeker56 Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    2,899
    Thanks Received:
    482
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    Ratings:
    +496
    Geez, I should have known................this whole thing is the fault of the REPUBLICANS!

    EVERYTHING is the fault of the Republicans! I keep forgetting!
     
  10. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,227
    Thanks Received:
    2,044
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,850
    Why is this so complicated?
    The tanker carrying oil to china can be wrecked spilling up to 1 million barrels!
    The pipeline carrying 300 barrels per mile will spill and harm considerable LESS!

    So why are environmentalists against a method that REDUCES risk of millions of barrels and reduces the amount of spills.. i.e. ships are prone to wrecks.. pipelines are NOT prone to leak and if the pipeline does.. less then 300 barrels!

    I don't get it why that is so complicated to understand!
     

Share This Page