Email Released Shows Elana Kagan Celebrating Obamacare's Passage

The email is going viral tonight since it's release earlier today and it shows that Elana Kagan showed bias towards it's passage. As we all know, Obama's Health Care Law goes before the Supreme Court to see if it is constitutional and for a Judge currently sitting on the bench that has been revealed to be celebrating it's passage calls for her to recuse herself from the upcoming ruling. It is imperative that she do so. This law will have drastic consequences for all Americans and businesses if passed. Again, Kagan must recuse herself. It is required.


Kagan to Tribe on Day Obamacare Passed:

Read her email here:
http://www.cnsnews.com/sites/default/files/documents/TRIBE-KAGAN EMAIL EXCHANGE-03-21-10.pdf
Well, we already knew her vote would go towards Obamacare anyway.. But , I believe that is a conflict of interest since she is now in the supreme court it should be what it says in the constitution and not what a judge feels personally.
 

Scalia ruled against Cheney.

Think Marx little minx, Kagan will rule against Dear Leader? What about her mindless little dog, Sotomayor? Think she'll rule anything other than "ditto whatever she said?" What a female SCOTUS group you fascists have - two Marxists and a moron...




Uhh, no, he didn't.

Scalia sides with Cheney, as expected

This case received a great deal of press attention because Justice Antonin Scalia refused to recuse himself from it, despite his duck-hunting trip with Cheney. And unsurprisingly, Scalia did indeed side with Cheney in the case.

But rather than write an opinion, Scalia joined a brief dissent by Justice Clarence Thomas that would have resolved the matter in Cheney's favor -- and resolved it on the merits, going into the constitutional issues involved.
More litigation will follow on the Cheney energy task force - CNN
 
The only reason she's on SCOTUS is that we needed to get a smokin' hot woman in there!

In that case:

4dd26e86acd2d.jpg
 
Last edited:
Email Released Shows Elana Kagan Celebrating Obamacare's Passage

January 27, 2012

"At last night’s CNN presidential debate in Jacksonville, Florida, the GOP candidates told an unemployed woman in need of health insurance that they would repeal the health reform law that could help her find coverage and giver her a tax deduction to go out and find her own insurance.

The woman — Lynn Frazier — said she found herself “unemployed for the first time in 10 years and unable to afford health benefits.” Under the Affordable Care Act, Frazier may qualify for temporary insurance in the state’s high-risk pool, which already provides coverage for 3,285 Floridians who can’t find affordable coverage elsewhere. In two years, she’ll be able to pick out a health policy through the state’s Exchange. All private insurers will offer a comprehensive basic set of benefits and allow consumers like Frazier to compare and contrast different plans to find the coverage that works best for them and their family. Insurers won’t be able to deny insurance based on past illness or rescind coverage unexpectedly, as they often do in today’s health market, and Frazier will pay a “community” rate and may even qualify for tax credits to help her afford her premiums and out of pocket cost-sharing expenses.

The Republican candidates pledged to undo these benefits...."

The GOP's Final Solution

323.png
 
The email is going viral tonight since it's release earlier today and it shows that Elana Kagan showed bias towards it's passage. As we all know, Obama's Health Care Law goes before the Supreme Court to see if it is constitutional and for a Judge currently sitting on the bench that has been revealed to be celebrating it's passage calls for her to recuse herself from the upcoming ruling. It is imperative that she do so. This law will have drastic consequences for all Americans and businesses if passed. Again, Kagan must recuse herself. It is required.


Kagan to Tribe on Day Obamacare Passed:

Read her email here:
http://www.cnsnews.com/sites/default/files/documents/TRIBE-KAGAN EMAIL EXCHANGE-03-21-10.pdf

Bullshit. There is no greater conflict of interest than that of Scalia and Cheney, and Thomas and the Koch brothers. Neither recused when voting on CU v. FEC or Bush v. Gore or Cheney v. US District Court.
 
January 27, 2012

"Republican lawmakers are busy rubbing their hands together and waiting for the US Supreme Court to strike down the individual mandate in the Affordable Care Act. They believe this will give them the momentum they need to begin selling their "replacement plan" for Obamacare, after they repeal it, of course. Actually, they're hoping the Supreme Court will repeal it for them by upholding the non-severability clause which allows the entire law to be struck down if one provision is struck down.

The Republican plan will not preserve one of Obama’s most politically popular reforms: the requirement that insurers cover people who have pre-existing conditions. Some Republicans have said in the past that it would be difficult to walk away from that provision. But Pitts said the GOP will instead propose state-based pools in which the government would take over the cost of the sickest, most expensive patients, rather than requiring private insurers to cover them.

The rest of the plan Pitts outlined draws from long-standing GOP priorities. It will include limits on medical malpractice suits and allow the sale of insurance across state lines, Pitts said, while also expanding the use of health savings accounts."

GOP: STICKING IT To Medicare, AGAIN????

:eek:

(Whatta great way to make Medicare unaffordable!)​

RepubliCare.jpg
 
they are helping create this issue, just let it all hang out, if shes clear, she clear*shrugs*


Jonathan Turley, who is by no means a conservative points them out:

Of greater concern, in my view, is a separate email exchange on March 21, 2010 (the day PPACA was passing the House) with her top deputy Neal Katyal. Associate Attorney General Tom Perrelli had send a message to a group of DOJ lawyers, including Katyal, notifying them that there was going to be a meeting the next day to plan for the litigation expected to challenge PPACA. Kagan was included in the mailing, which would seem to confirm her offices involvement in the litigation planning. As head of that office, it raises a serious appearance problem and may reflect additional conversations that could have occurred between her and Katyal or other lawyers in effort. This was already one of the top priorities of the Administration and one would expect a comprehensive team at Justice Department that would include the Solicitor General’s office.

At the very least information likes this raises questions that ought to be answered. The problem is, the Justice Department is refusing to release anymore emails or other documents that might shed light on Kagan’s involvement in the preparation of defenses to the litigation against the PPACA:

Back in July, some 49 members of Congress signed a letter asking DOJ to produce certain documents on then-Solicitor General Kagan’s involvement with the ObamaCare case. Four months later the Justice Department wrote back declining to produce the documents. In that letter, Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich explained that the department has “grave concerns about the prospect of a congressional investigation into the pre-confirmation activities of a sitting Supreme Court Justice.” Justice Kagan, he added, had addressed the issue of her ObamaCare involvement during her confirmation hearings.

In a letter to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder on Friday, GOP Sen. Lamar Smith noted that in rejecting the request for documents, the Justice Department “did not assert any legal privilege to support the decision but instead concluded it would be ‘unseemly’ to comply with my request.” If the Justice Department does intend to assert a legal privilege, he added, he’d like to be informed of the basis for it by Friday.

Should Justice Kagan Recuse Herself From Health Care Reform Case?
 

Forum List

Back
Top