Discussion in 'Media' started by Buford, May 16, 2012.
Another leftist corrupt windbag is exposed.
Warren’s Story Falls Apart | FrontPage Magazine
Gee, I fondly remember lefties in here singing Lizzy's praises when she first announced she'd seek the nomination so she could walk over Brown while rescuing Teddy's seat from the dark side. But all I can say now is...Cowabunga!
The left is sick.
1) this is a big deal to me..
Zmek then revealed (probably inadvertently) why many Americans consider mainstream media claims of even-handed reporting beneath contempt. She confirmed to Breitbart that “no other news organization had contacted her to date on any national topic or to inquire about the validity of this purported 1894 Logan County, Oklahoma marriage license application or anything related to the 1894 marriage of William J. Crawford.”
maybe they are all still in Wasilla digging dirt on Palin....
Fordham piece called Warren Harvard Law's 'first woman of color'
Elizabeth Warren has pushed back hard on questions about a Harvard Crimson piece in 1996 that described her as Native American, saying she had no idea the school where she taught law was billing her that way and saying it never came up during her hiring a year earlier, which others have backed up.
But a 1997 Fordham Law Review piece described her as Harvard Law School’s “first woman of color,” based, according to the notes at the bottom of the story, on a “telephone interview with Michael Chmura, News Director, Harvard Law (Aug. 6, 1996).”…
The description of her as a minority is coming from the same person – Chmura – whose comments to the Crimson sparked the original story about her heritage, and Warren’s camp argued it’s old news.
She has said she had no idea Harvard was billing her that way or how the school found out that her family claims Native American heritage. She learned of it first from the Herald story, she said.
Fordham piece called Elizabeth Warren Harvard Law's 'first woman of color' - POLITICO.com
so at the end of the day they got that snippet on her nativity form someone somewhere and, that someone NEVER actually verified it either...Oh and of course warren says she never got any special treatment based on her heritage..hello how the hell does she know that? Its almost a dead certainty she did, since the news she was Indian was not a secret as Harvard didn't mind telling anyone....and she was listed as such.
The corruption in our media goes very deep. Why else would the left be so angry at people like Breitbart?
It won't matter, they will still vote for her because she has a D after her name..
you'd never, ever vote for someone just because they have an r after their name, would you?
I don't think she will defeat Brown. I never have.
Would you vote for Elizabeth Warren now?
no, but i wouldn't have voted for her before.
i dislike carpetbaggers
Separate names with a comma.