- Dec 18, 2011
- 12,919
- 4,822
- 350
She's lied about some pretty big things. How can anyone trust her for anything?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Here is the bottom line: Elizabeth Warren is a fraud and a liar.
There is no way the voters of Massachusetts are going to let this pretend Indian and pretend lawyer PRETEND to be a Senator. She's lost all credibility.
Scott Walker and his pick up truck - will both be reelected.
You assured us Sharon Angle would get elected
It seems you didn't. You omitted this part:
Unless she used a New Jersey address, and her application for the SCOTUS bar listed the NJ address, you're still a Dickless Fuck who doesn't understand what he's talking about.
What a crock of shit
Latest Republican outrage of the day. I still dont see where she was practicing in a Massachusetts court. If she needed a Massachusetts license, she would have gotten one. It seems her practice centered on federal law where a state license is irrelevant
Here is the bottom line: Elizabeth Warren is a fraud and a liar.
There is no way the voters of Massachusetts are going to let this pretend Indian and pretend lawyer PRETEND to be a Senator. She's lost all credibility.
Scott Walker and his pick up truck - will both be reelected.
Unless she used a New Jersey address, and her application for the SCOTUS bar listed the NJ address, you're still a Dickless Fuck who doesn't understand what he's talking about.
What a crock of shit
Latest Republican outrage of the day. I still dont see where she was practicing in a Massachusetts court. If she needed a Massachusetts license, she would have gotten one. It seems her practice centered on federal law where a state license is irrelevant
You obviously did not read the posted requirements to pass the SCOTUS bar. Color me shocked.
Here is the bottom line: Elizabeth Warren is a fraud and a liar.
There is no way the voters of Massachusetts are going to let this pretend Indian and pretend lawyer PRETEND to be a Senator. She's lost all credibility.
Scott Walker and his pick up truck - will both be reelected.
How is she a pretend lawyer?
As for the Indian thing, who fucking cares? My husband's family insists they are part native Americans because that is what their family lore tells them. As far as I know, none of them have been dna tested over it.
And again, HOW IS SHE A PRETEND LAWYER?
What a crock of shit
Latest Republican outrage of the day. I still dont see where she was practicing in a Massachusetts court. If she needed a Massachusetts license, she would have gotten one. It seems her practice centered on federal law where a state license is irrelevant
You obviously did not read the posted requirements to pass the SCOTUS bar. Color me shocked.
She is on the SCOTUS now?
the natural extension of the liberal defense of Warren goes like this....Elizabeth Lie-a-watha Warren, the fake Indian is also a fake attorney...big surprise!
and?
for the record, she wouldn't have to be licensed in Mass to do an of counsel on a US Supreme Court matter... she'd have to be admitted to practice before the US Supreme Court.
d'uh.
...Fauxahontas is a victim!! ..she meant well...she was good fake Indian.....she even copied a few recipes and passed them off as her own...to help the Indians......she does have those high cheekbones.....she was only 'of counsel'.....she's a minority!!! WAR ON WOMEN!!!!
Face it Jillian- she is a joke.
Isn't Simpson, Thacher, and Bartlett a firm in NY?
more like Dewy, Cheetham and Howe
Did any of you bother to even look at the link in post 17?
It seems you didn't. You omitted this part:
Warren listed only one other place of admission on her Texas record, New Jersey:
Unless she used a New Jersey address, and her application for the SCOTUS bar listed the NJ address, you're still a Dickless Fuck who doesn't understand what he's talking about.
the natural extension of the liberal defense of Warren goes like this....Elizabeth Lie-a-watha Warren, the fake Indian is also a fake attorney...big surprise!
and?
for the record, she wouldn't have to be licensed in Mass to do an of counsel on a US Supreme Court matter... she'd have to be admitted to practice before the US Supreme Court.
d'uh.
...Fauxahontas is a victim!! ..she meant well...she was good fake Indian.....she even copied a few recipes and passed them off as her own...to help the Indians......she does have those high cheekbones.....she was only 'of counsel'.....she's a minority!!! WAR ON WOMEN!!!!
Face it Jillian- she is a joke.
Unless she used a New Jersey address, and her application for the SCOTUS bar listed the NJ address, you're still a Dickless Fuck who doesn't understand what he's talking about.
What a crock of shit
Latest Republican outrage of the day. I still dont see where she was practicing in a Massachusetts court. If she needed a Massachusetts license, she would have gotten one. It seems her practice centered on federal law where a state license is irrelevant
You obviously did not read the posted requirements to pass the SCOTUS bar. Color me shocked.
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLPIsn't Simpson, Thacher, and Bartlett a firm in NY?
Here is the bottom line: Elizabeth Warren is a fraud and a liar.
There is no way the voters of Massachusetts are going to let this pretend Indian and pretend lawyer PRETEND to be a Senator. She's lost all credibility.
Scott Walker and his pick up truck - will both be reelected.
What a crock of shit
Latest Republican outrage of the day. I still dont see where she was practicing in a Massachusetts court. If she needed a Massachusetts license, she would have gotten one. It seems her practice centered on federal law where a state license is irrelevant
You obviously did not read the posted requirements to pass the SCOTUS bar. Color me shocked.
She is on the SCOTUS now?
Guys, I'd love for this to be the death pang for Elizabeth the fraud Warren. But she hasn't done anything illegal by being of counsel on a federal case with bar in NJ in Mass. It's all right here in the thread. She only needs a district bar, which she has, and admittance to the federal court, which she definitely has, as they check for these in federal cases. Unless you think the court went on vacation and Warren just jumped in and practiced law without the proper credentials.
This is a nonissue, unfortunately.
(9/24/2012) UPDATED WITH AUDIO OF WARRENS ADMISSION PROFESSORS BOMBSHELL CHARGE: ELIZABETH WARREN PRACTICED LAW IN MASS. WITHOUT A LICENSE (The Blaze)
(Link omitted since I cant post a url until I have 15 posts.)
But also bear in mind the following [via another veteran lawyer who wrote NRO]:
I have practiced law for 30 years. Your correspondent is correct that a federal court can permit an attorney from a state outside the state wherein the federal court sits to appear before that court. The practice is called*pro hac vice,*which is Latin for for this occasion. Here are the*pro hac vice requirements*for the District Court of Mass, which would be the relevant court in this case.
However, this does not conclude the issue. There would still need to be an attorney licensed in Mass. who moved for Ms. Warren to be admitted*pro hac vice*for the case at hand. Such a document would have to be in the docket of the case as to which she was representing her client. If Ms. Warren simply filed pleadings without first being admitted to the court*pro hac vice, she would be implicitly representing to the court that she was, in fact, licensed to practice in Mass., and if she was not so licensed, she would have violated the courts rules, and, in effect, have committed a fraud upon the court.
Guys, I'd love for this to be the death pang for Elizabeth the fraud Warren. But she hasn't done anything illegal by being of counsel on a federal case with bar in NJ in Mass. It's all right here in the thread. She only needs a district bar, which she has, and admittance to the federal court, which she definitely has, as they check for these in federal cases. Unless you think the court went on vacation and Warren just jumped in and practiced law without the proper credentials.
This is a nonissue, unfortunately.
I checked Pacer and I couldn't find an Elizabeth Warren licensed to practice law in Mass. Federal District Court: (Link omitted since I cant post a url until I have 15 posts.)
Is she registered in another state's Federal District Court?
I suspect not since, as I understand it, she is currently "inactive" in Texas and by her own admission in a recent radio interview she was "inactive" for a lengthy period of time prior to resigning her New Jersey membership sometime this month. She says she resigned due to the recent implementation of Continuing Legal Ed requirements but my cynical suspicion is that it was an attempt to obscure the fact that she wasn't registered as active anywhere, which (correct me if I'm wrong) she would need to be to fill out an application to practice before the Supreme Judicial Court.
A Mass attorney could have moved to have her admitted on a particular case but, as the article excerpted further below notes, the necessary document would be in the court docket. How hard would it be to produce such a document from each of the 5 or 6 cases she handled in recent years?
And, at the risk of seeming overly philosophical about this, I suspect this resonates with people since without even getting into the minutae of it there seems to be some sense that she is exploiting a loop hole or engaging in gamesmanship which reeks of hypocrisy given that she professes to advocate for the little guy against corporations that bend and twist the rules to their advantage. To say nothing of the subtle parallel between this and her questionable status as a native american indian.
Perhaps an even more subtle point is that the harder you dig (as I did and as I suspect you did) to try and figure out if she is licensed in Mass. and whether she needs to be, the more one is struck by how exclusive her legal services are. She's not listed on the Mass BBO site, or the Pacer Fed'l District Court site. Just how did Travelers get her name and number to represent them in that pesky asbestos suit in which the claimants were ultimately royally stiffed?
Finally, she has declined to produce records which would establish the scope of her practice. While documents in the public domain would suggest that she limited her practice to the venue where she could get away with practicing without an active law license I'm not inclined to give "Lieawatha" any benefit of the doubt.
(9/24/2012) UPDATED WITH AUDIO OF WARRENS ADMISSION PROFESSORS BOMBSHELL CHARGE: ELIZABETH WARREN PRACTICED LAW IN MASS. WITHOUT A LICENSE (The Blaze)
(Link omitted since I cant post a url until I have 15 posts.)
But also bear in mind the following [via another veteran lawyer who wrote NRO]:
I have practiced law for 30 years. Your correspondent is correct that a federal court can permit an attorney from a state outside the state wherein the federal court sits to appear before that court. The practice is called*pro hac vice,*which is Latin for for this occasion. Here are the*pro hac vice requirements*for the District Court of Mass, which would be the relevant court in this case.
However, this does not conclude the issue. There would still need to be an attorney licensed in Mass. who moved for Ms. Warren to be admitted*pro hac vice*for the case at hand. Such a document would have to be in the docket of the case as to which she was representing her client. If Ms. Warren simply filed pleadings without first being admitted to the court*pro hac vice, she would be implicitly representing to the court that she was, in fact, licensed to practice in Mass., and if she was not so licensed, she would have violated the courts rules, and, in effect, have committed a fraud upon the court.
TG