Elizabeth Warren- NO MASS LAW LICENSE

Zander

Platinum Member
Sep 10, 2009
22,519
9,104
940
Los Angeles CA
Elizabeth Lie-a-watha Warren, the fake Indian is also a fake attorney...big surprise!

Speaking to Boston's 96.9 FM radio program "Jim and Margery" on Monday, Democratic Senate challenger Elizabeth Warren admitted that she is not licensed to practice law in Massachusetts.

According to reports from listeners, she claimed that she does not maintain a law practice. She also "said that she gave up her New Jersey license because she could not keep up with the Continuing Education requirements," according to one listener who commented on Breitbart's Monday story, "Does Elizabeth Warren Have a Law License Problem?".

Ms. Warren's statement comes as a surprise to the many clients she's provided legal services to over the past decade, including the law firm of Simpson, Thacher, and Bartlett, which listed her as "of counsel" in the 2009 brief they submitted to the United States Supreme Court on behalf of their client, Travelers Insurance.
 
I can relate. New Jersey bar requirements are a pain in the butt. especially when you are out of state. Not really worth the hassel in my opinion. Thankfully there are better states in the union.
 
If she worked for a law firm, as a lawyer, without a license in that state, isn't that, you know... ILLEGAL????
 
Last edited:
Where has she been practicing law?

If you are not an active lawyer there is no need to maintain a license
 
Last edited:
Where has she been practicing law?

THIS.

You are able to charge fees to mediate as long as it is known you have no standing within the court system. You CAN take advisory roles sans a license, just not under the guise that you do have one.

Filing papers for a client is practicing law. If she engaged in doing that, she practiced law without a license.
 
Where has she been practicing law?

THIS.

You are able to charge fees to mediate as long as it is known you have no standing within the court system. You CAN take advisory roles sans a license, just not under the guise that you do have one.

Filing papers for a client is practicing law. If she engaged in doing that, she practiced law without a license.

If she did it in Massachusetts where she's not licensed to practice. Haven't seen any claim of that yet.
 
See Section 83.5.3(b)

“(b) Other Attorneys. An attorney who is a member of the bar of any United States District Court or the bar of the highest court of any state may appear and practice in this court in a particular case by leave granted in the discretion of the court, provided he files a certificate that (1) he is a member of the bar in good standing in every jurisdiction where he has been admitted to practice; (2) there are no disciplinary proceedings pending against him as a member of the bar in any jurisdiction; and (3) he is familiar with the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts; and provided further, his application for leave to practice in this court is on motion of a member of the bar of this court, who shall also file an appearance. An attorney seeking admission under this subsection may not enter an appearance or sign any papers until his application has been granted, except that the attorney may sign a complaint or any paper necessary to prevent entry of default for failure to answer or otherwise plead, provided such complaint or other paper is accompanied by his application for admission in proper form.”


She doesn't need a Mass bar to work a federal case. However, sh'es still a fraud.
 
Where has she been practicing law?

If you are not an active lawyer there is no need to maintain a license

Here are the details...

Maintained private law practice at Cambridge office for over a decade but not licensed in Massachusetts

Warren attempted to deny her role, and referred to a Boston Globe article, but the Globe article supports Brown’s account. The Globe article indicated the representation was for a period of three years and Warren was paid $212,000. The case resulted in a Supreme Court victory for Travelers arising out of a bankruptcy case in New York.

Warren represented not just Travelers, but numerous other companies starting in the late 1990s working out of and using her Harvard Law School office in Cambridge, which she listed as her office of record on briefs filed with various courts. Warren, however, never has been licensed to practice law in Massachusetts.

1. Warren Is Not Licensed To Practice Law In Massachusetts

Warren is not licensed to practice law in Massachusetts. Warren’s name does not turn up on a search of the Board of Bar Overseers attorney search website (searches just by last name or using Elizabeth Herring also do not turn up any relevant entries).

2. Warren Used Her Cambridge Office as Her Law Office

Regardless of where she was admitted, Warren consistently since the late 1990s has held herself out as having her professional address for legal representation at her Harvard Law School office in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Warren was listed as “Of Counsel” on Travelers’ Supreme Court Brief, listing her Harvard Law School office as her office address:
Travelers-v-Bailey-Brief-Cover.jpg


She used her Cambridge address as her address in multiple legal cases and briefs.
 
Last edited:
And she was working a federal case. So it seems there is a montain of nothing here. Besides the fact we already knew she is a fraud.
 
Being of counsel and not being an attorney is a MAJOR problem.

That depends on location. In certain states you can give counsel.

Practice of law - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"There is some agreement that appearing in a legally-constituted court in a legal proceeding to represent clients (particularly for a fee) is considered to be unauthorized practice of law.[1][2] But other variations are subject to interpretation and conflicting regulation, particularly as to the scope and breadth of the prohibition."

It's lawfulness is usually interpreted on the state level.
 

Forum List

Back
Top