Elizabeth Warren For SCOTUS

[TeaBagger]

Now that Scalia is taking a dirt nap Obama's constitutional duty is the pick a nominee. I had some thoughts. I was thinking he'd nominate Shotgun Joe Biden, Barney Frank or some lesser known jurist but when I received this Email from Florida Congressman Alan Grayson I knew who I was going to want to see on the US Supreme Court. It's a no brainer. Elizabeth Warren is the obvious choice and here's why.


1. Elizabeth Warren is squeaky clean. (There are no clean conservatives, they simply do not exist. Look at what a disaster that scumbag Clarence Thomas is.)

2. Elizabeth Warren is brilliant! She as the ability to arrive at the obvious very quickly.

3. She's a woman of the people and unlike any CONservative she's not mobbed up with the 1%.

4. Even if the criminal Republican scum block her nomination they will get bloodied up in the process.

Grayson's argument is even more persuasive.

Dear Mr. President,

Please appoint Elizabeth Warren to the Supreme Court, before the end of the week.

Why Elizabeth Warren? She started waiting tables at the age of 13, a year after her father was driven into poverty by a heart attack followed by huge medical bills. She later taught children with disabilities. She was a Harvard Law Professor for almost two decades – in fact, the only one there with tenure who had attended a public university. Her scholarly work is renowned; she is one of the most frequently cited law professors of all time.

She has been an indefatigable watchdog over the capital markets for almost a decade, going back to her extraordinarily valuable work on the Congressional Oversight Panel for the federal bailout program. She created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, even though the Senate Republicans wouldn’t let her run it. She electrified the nation with her “you didn’t build that” speech. And she has been a tireless and effective U.S. Senator.

Fourteen Senators and 17 Congressman have been appointed to the Supreme Court. So it wouldn’t be the first time this happened.

One more thing: Senator Warren is an outstanding writer and communicator, something that the Supreme Court badly needs. (Justice Scalia recently attacked a colleague for a writing style “as pretentious as it [is] egotistic.”) In my opinion, the two best judicial writers of my lifetime are Justice Hugo Black, a former Senator, and Judge Abner Mikva, a former Congressman. (I worked with Mikva; I know what I’m talking about.) Serving in either House of Congress is a very effective lesson in communication.

Would obstructionists in the Senate filibuster an Elizabeth Warren appointment, or vote against her? Maybe. But that seems like poor form against one of their own, for a place as clubby as the U.S. Senate.
And the President should appoint Warren right now, before the end of this week. That would make it a “recess appointment,” and Justice Warren could take office immediately. The obstructionists in the GOP couldn’t do anything about it.

One last reason why Elizabeth Warren should be on the U.S. Supreme Court:

She’s earned it. She deserves it. And she’ll be so, so good at it.

 

[Avatar4321]

The woman who has lying about being a minority for years is squeaky clean?

You must have a different definitions than I do

 

[Si modo]

Classy.

I'm sure Warren appreciates your support.

 

[Dovahkiin]

Ok, I'm horrible. I laughed at the pro life meme picture.

 

[Hossfly]

Now that Scalia is taking a dirt nap Obama's constitutional duty is the pick a nominee. I had some thoughts. I was thinking he'd nominate Shotgun Joe Biden, Barney Frank or some lesser known jurist but when I received this Email from Florida Congressman Alan Grayson I knew who I was going to want to see on the US Supreme Court. It's a no brainer. Elizabeth Warren is the obvious choice and here's why.


1. Elizabeth Warren is squeaky clean. (There are no clean conservatives, they simply do not exist. Look at what a disaster that scumbag Clarence Thomas is.)

2. Elizabeth Warren is brilliant! She as the ability to arrive at the obvious very quickly.

3. She's a woman of the people and unlike any CONservative she's not mobbed up with the 1%.

4. Even if the criminal Republican scum block her nomination they will get bloodied up in the process.

Grayson's argument is even more persuasive.

Dear Mr. President,

Please appoint Elizabeth Warren to the Supreme Court, before the end of the week.

Why Elizabeth Warren? She started waiting tables at the age of 13, a year after her father was driven into poverty by a heart attack followed by huge medical bills. She later taught children with disabilities. She was a Harvard Law Professor for almost two decades – in fact, the only one there with tenure who had attended a public university. Her scholarly work is renowned; she is one of the most frequently cited law professors of all time.

She has been an indefatigable watchdog over the capital markets for almost a decade, going back to her extraordinarily valuable work on the Congressional Oversight Panel for the federal bailout program. She created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, even though the Senate Republicans wouldn’t let her run it. She electrified the nation with her “you didn’t build that” speech. And she has been a tireless and effective U.S. Senator.

Fourteen Senators and 17 Congressman have been appointed to the Supreme Court. So it wouldn’t be the first time this happened.

One more thing: Senator Warren is an outstanding writer and communicator, something that the Supreme Court badly needs. (Justice Scalia recently attacked a colleague for a writing style “as pretentious as it [is] egotistic.”) In my opinion, the two best judicial writers of my lifetime are Justice Hugo Black, a former Senator, and Judge Abner Mikva, a former Congressman. (I worked with Mikva; I know what I’m talking about.) Serving in either House of Congress is a very effective lesson in communication.

Would obstructionists in the Senate filibuster an Elizabeth Warren appointment, or vote against her? Maybe. But that seems like poor form against one of their own, for a place as clubby as the U.S. Senate.
And the President should appoint Warren right now, before the end of this week. That would make it a “recess appointment,” and Justice Warren could take office immediately. The obstructionists in the GOP couldn’t do anything about it.

One last reason why Elizabeth Warren should be on the U.S. Supreme Court:

She’s earned it. She deserves it. And she’ll be so, so good at it.

Now that Scalia is taking a dirt nap Obama's constitutional duty is the pick a nominee. I had some thoughts. I was thinking he'd nominate Shotgun Joe Biden, Barney Frank or some lesser known jurist but when I received this Email from Florida Congressman Alan Grayson I knew who I was going to want to see on the US Supreme Court. It's a no brainer. Elizabeth Warren is the obvious choice and here's why.


1. Elizabeth Warren is squeaky clean. (There are no clean conservatives, they simply do not exist. Look at what a disaster that scumbag Clarence Thomas is.)

2. Elizabeth Warren is brilliant! She as the ability to arrive at the obvious very quickly.

3. She's a woman of the people and unlike any CONservative she's not mobbed up with the 1%.

4. Even if the criminal Republican scum block her nomination they will get bloodied up in the process.

Grayson's argument is even more persuasive.

Dear Mr. President,

Please appoint Elizabeth Warren to the Supreme Court, before the end of the week.

Why Elizabeth Warren? She started waiting tables at the age of 13, a year after her father was driven into poverty by a heart attack followed by huge medical bills. She later taught children with disabilities. She was a Harvard Law Professor for almost two decades – in fact, the only one there with tenure who had attended a public university. Her scholarly work is renowned; she is one of the most frequently cited law professors of all time.

She has been an indefatigable watchdog over the capital markets for almost a decade, going back to her extraordinarily valuable work on the Congressional Oversight Panel for the federal bailout program. She created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, even though the Senate Republicans wouldn’t let her run it. She electrified the nation with her “you didn’t build that” speech. And she has been a tireless and effective U.S. Senator.

Fourteen Senators and 17 Congressman have been appointed to the Supreme Court. So it wouldn’t be the first time this happened.

One more thing: Senator Warren is an outstanding writer and communicator, something that the Supreme Court badly needs. (Justice Scalia recently attacked a colleague for a writing style “as pretentious as it [is] egotistic.”) In my opinion, the two best judicial writers of my lifetime are Justice Hugo Black, a former Senator, and Judge Abner Mikva, a former Congressman. (I worked with Mikva; I know what I’m talking about.) Serving in either House of Congress is a very effective lesson in communication.

Would obstructionists in the Senate filibuster an Elizabeth Warren appointment, or vote against her? Maybe. But that seems like poor form against one of their own, for a place as clubby as the U.S. Senate.
And the President should appoint Warren right now, before the end of this week. That would make it a “recess appointment,” and Justice Warren could take office immediately. The obstructionists in the GOP couldn’t do anything about it.

One last reason why Elizabeth Warren should be on the U.S. Supreme Court:

She’s earned it. She deserves it. And she’ll be so, so good at it.

Pocahontas in the SC? No way.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

She's a 'Faux Squaw' meaning she's an unethical liar.

 

[kiwiman127]

Getting away from the typical partisan bickering here at USMB, I think Obama should appoint a pragmatic centralist.
We have four from the right and four from the left, we need the a tie-breaker Supreme that isn't lead by ideological philosophy but instead is lead by the Constitution.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Getting away from the typical partisan bickering here at USMB, I think Obama should appoint a pragmatic centralist.
We have four from the right and four from the left, we need the a tie-breaker Supreme that isn't lead by ideological philosophy but instead is lead by the Constitution.

I just think that this is supposedly a democracy.... and it all feels so dirty.

 

[TeaBagger]

Getting away from the typical partisan bickering here at USMB, I think Obama should appoint a pragmatic centralist.
We have four from the right and four from the left, we need the a tie-breaker Supreme that isn't lead by ideological philosophy but instead is lead by the Constitution.

That would be Warren.

 

[TeaBagger]

She's a 'Faux Squaw' meaning she's an unethical liar.

Elizabeth Warren Native American Heritage Backed Up By ...

Your racist remark is not appreciated but you righties are held to lower standards. When it comes to brains they treat you righties like special Olympians.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

She's a 'Faux Squaw' meaning she's an unethical liar.

Elizabeth Warren Native American Heritage Backed Up By ...

Your racist remark is not appreciated but you righties are held to lower standards. When it comes to brains they treat you righties like special Olympians.

Huffington Post has no credibility.

 

[bripat9643]

Now that Scalia is taking a dirt nap Obama's constitutional duty is the pick a nominee. I had some thoughts. I was thinking he'd nominate Shotgun Joe Biden, Barney Frank or some lesser known jurist but when I received this Email from Florida Congressman Alan Grayson I knew who I was going to want to see on the US Supreme Court. It's a no brainer. Elizabeth Warren is the obvious choice and here's why.


1. Elizabeth Warren is squeaky clean. (There are no clean conservatives, they simply do not exist. Look at what a disaster that scumbag Clarence Thomas is.)

2. Elizabeth Warren is brilliant! She as the ability to arrive at the obvious very quickly.

3. She's a woman of the people and unlike any CONservative she's not mobbed up with the 1%.

4. Even if the criminal Republican scum block her nomination they will get bloodied up in the process.

Grayson's argument is even more persuasive.

Dear Mr. President,

Please appoint Elizabeth Warren to the Supreme Court, before the end of the week.

Why Elizabeth Warren? She started waiting tables at the age of 13, a year after her father was driven into poverty by a heart attack followed by huge medical bills. She later taught children with disabilities. She was a Harvard Law Professor for almost two decades – in fact, the only one there with tenure who had attended a public university. Her scholarly work is renowned; she is one of the most frequently cited law professors of all time.

She has been an indefatigable watchdog over the capital markets for almost a decade, going back to her extraordinarily valuable work on the Congressional Oversight Panel for the federal bailout program. She created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, even though the Senate Republicans wouldn’t let her run it. She electrified the nation with her “you didn’t build that” speech. And she has been a tireless and effective U.S. Senator.

Fourteen Senators and 17 Congressman have been appointed to the Supreme Court. So it wouldn’t be the first time this happened.

One more thing: Senator Warren is an outstanding writer and communicator, something that the Supreme Court badly needs. (Justice Scalia recently attacked a colleague for a writing style “as pretentious as it [is] egotistic.”) In my opinion, the two best judicial writers of my lifetime are Justice Hugo Black, a former Senator, and Judge Abner Mikva, a former Congressman. (I worked with Mikva; I know what I’m talking about.) Serving in either House of Congress is a very effective lesson in communication.

Would obstructionists in the Senate filibuster an Elizabeth Warren appointment, or vote against her? Maybe. But that seems like poor form against one of their own, for a place as clubby as the U.S. Senate.
And the President should appoint Warren right now, before the end of this week. That would make it a “recess appointment,” and Justice Warren could take office immediately. The obstructionists in the GOP couldn’t do anything about it.

One last reason why Elizabeth Warren should be on the U.S. Supreme Court:

She’s earned it. She deserves it. And she’ll be so, so good at it.

ELIZABETH WARREN?

 

[bripat9643]

She's a 'Faux Squaw' meaning she's an unethical liar.

Elizabeth Warren Native American Heritage Backed Up By ...

Your racist remark is not appreciated but you righties are held to lower standards. When it comes to brains they treat you righties like special Olympians.

How dare you insult the mentally handicapped!

 

[TeaBagger]

She's a 'Faux Squaw' meaning she's an unethical liar.

Elizabeth Warren Native American Heritage Backed Up By ...

Your racist remark is not appreciated but you righties are held to lower standards. When it comes to brains they treat you righties like special Olympians.

Huffington Post has no credibility.

The documentation proves she's part Native American and you know it but all you have is the ability to spread the lies of the criminal right.

 

[bripat9643]

She's a 'Faux Squaw' meaning she's an unethical liar.

Elizabeth Warren Native American Heritage Backed Up By ...

Your racist remark is not appreciated but you righties are held to lower standards. When it comes to brains they treat you righties like special Olympians.

Huffington Post has no credibility.

The documentation proves she's part Native American and you know it but all you have is the ability to spread the lies of the criminal right.

What "documentation" is that? The tribe she claims she's a member of claims none of her ancestors were members of the tribe.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

She's a 'Faux Squaw' meaning she's an unethical liar.

Elizabeth Warren Native American Heritage Backed Up By ...

Your racist remark is not appreciated but you righties are held to lower standards. When it comes to brains they treat you righties like special Olympians.

Huffington Post has no credibility.

The documentation proves she's part Native American and you know it but all you have is the ability to spread the lies of the criminal right.

The amateur geneologist admits she made a mistake

Amateur Genealogist Who Backed '1/32 Cherokee' Warren Now Admits Mistake - Breitbart

 

[JoeMoma]

This sock needs laundering. P-U

 

[ScienceRocks]

A younger Bernie sanders needs to get confirmed and put on the court!

 

[ScienceRocks]

She's a 'Faux Squaw' meaning she's an unethical liar.

Elizabeth Warren Native American Heritage Backed Up By ...

Your racist remark is not appreciated but you righties are held to lower standards. When it comes to brains they treat you righties like special Olympians.

Huffington Post has no credibility.

The documentation proves she's part Native American and you know it but all you have is the ability to spread the lies of the criminal right.

The amateur geneologist admits she made a mistake

Amateur Genealogist Who Backed '1/32 Cherokee' Warren Now Admits Mistake - Breitbart

I am 1/6th

 

[JoeMoma]

She's a 'Faux Squaw' meaning she's an unethical liar.

Elizabeth Warren Native American Heritage Backed Up By ...

Your racist remark is not appreciated but you righties are held to lower standards. When it comes to brains they treat you righties like special Olympians.

Huffington Post has no credibility.

The documentation proves she's part Native American and you know it but all you have is the ability to spread the lies of the criminal right.

The amateur geneologist admits she made a mistake

Amateur Genealogist Who Backed '1/32 Cherokee' Warren Now Admits Mistake - Breitbart

I am 1/6th

Test tube baby? How do you explain the math to get 1/6th?