Election 2018: Rust Belt vs Transgender Crap. This Should Get Interesting...

[Silhouette]

Watch how fast USMB tries to dungeon this political topic..

Ohio Parents Could Lose Custody of 17-Year-Old Child Over Not Supporting Gender Transition

An Ohio court will soon decide if the parents of a teen girl — who identifies as a transgender male — should lose custody because they object to their 17-year-old child’s gender transition....The parents, though, see the situation much differently, according to their attorney Karen Brinkman. The girl’s parents believe giving the grandparents custody “would simply be a way for the child to circumvent the necessity of parents’ consent,”...

Yes, exactly. The cult of LGBT will have your obedience or you will lose your children.

Brinkman said the Ohio parents don’t believe their daughter is in a healthy mental state and able to make a decision as serious as beginning to transition. They have “done their due diligence contacting medical professionals, collecting thousands of hours of research,” she noted.

Wouldn't be hard to find physicians willing to take the stand and say "yes, the use of hormones on children that aren't FDA approved for such use, to enable serious mental delusions by preparing their bodies for unnecessary amputation of vital organs, while making them sign waivers (in that mental state) agreeing that no such thing as an actual sex change is possible, amounts to child abuse".

After all, if the doctors took the stand and defended these Frankensteinian practices on children/vulnerable adults, they''d at a minimum be guilty of malpractice. But actually they'd be guilty of child endangerment.

Moving forward, the court’s decision will have serious and far-reaching implications for the autonomy parents have to care for their minor children.

“If the judge rules in favor of the ideologically driven gender clinic, the ability of all parents to protect their children of any age from all aspects of this social and medical experiment will take a tremendous hit,” Michelle Cretella president of the American College of Pediatricians, told the Post.

Here's something else the President of the American College of Pediatricians told the press recently:
Transgender hormone blockers are ‘institutionalized child abuse’: pediatrician

WASHINGTON, D.C., October 17, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) — A nationally recognized pediatrician offered a jolting reality check about the dangers of encouraging children to think they are transgender and prescribing hormone blockers to prevent them from developing.

On October 11, the Heritage Foundation sponsored a forum on transgenderism at which Dr. Michelle Cretella said it is child abuse to facilitate gender confusion in children by helping them “transition” to the opposite sex.

So, will the Rust Belt sign up in 2018 for the party tied at the hip to this cult? Or will they resist like in 2016? (they're not just forcing your daughters to shower with boys in the locker room at school anymore folks...they're coming for your kids to take them away if you resist..!)

Selling Out Women To Transgender Bullies Helped Elect Donald Trump

Democrats Chose the Trans Agenda Over Women’s Rights
Of course, on many issues it did, such as equal pay for equal work and paid maternity leave. But in May 2016, right in the thick of the campaign season, Democrats betrayed women in favor of transsexuals. A joint Justice and Education department directive threatened to pull federal aid from school districts that would not allow transsexual access to bathrooms and locker rooms of their chosen gender. Twenty-three states immediately filed a lawsuit challenging that directive.

So, who will you vote for in 2018 folks? The LGBT party or the republicans? (the word "democrat" really doesn't exist anymore other than a faux label covering the rainbow armband underneath)

 

[Silhouette]

Well the people trying to take away this family's daughter can subpoena physicians from Stanford to testify that the parents MUST enable their daughter's delusional state: Stanford University CA: A Liberal Science Institution's Split Personality FAIL

It makes sense. The institution itself suffers from a split perception and stance on delusional behavior, so why not enable delusions in children?

 

[Silhouette]

Dumont v Lyons 2017 : Will Fathers (or Mothers) Be Judicially-Legislated Into Irrelevance?

Sorry additional Rust Belt State, your ability to self-govern on radical social experiments will be overruled and you will be forced to come to heel of the LGBT cult:

Attorneys for the ACLU and ACLU of Michigan filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court to challenge the state’s practice of permitting state-funded child placement agencies to use religious criteria to turn away lesbian and gay prospective foster and adoptive parents. The legislature passed a law in 2015 with the purpose of codifying that practice. Dumont v. Lyon

Do you suppose Michigan had its reasons for codifying keeping children from contractual binds that prohibit children (sons and daughters) from knowing either a father or mother for life? Remember, singles don't possess such a contract and the incentive of (mother/father) marriage pushes them to go toward providing that vital missing parent.

Here the cult is using two of its lesbian devotees to force adoption agencies to disgorge children into contractual motherless/fatherless for life "marriages" (forced on the Rust Belt State of Michigan in 2015). And I suppose in this case as with all others, separate counsel will not be briefing as required on behalf of children, apart from the plaintiff's and defendants.

Remember, ALL parties to a case must have representation briefing the court, or it's a mistrial:
(post 201) Bermuda Becomes First Country to Repeal Same-Sex Marriage After Widespread Criticisms

 

[Silhouette]

I wonder if next kids can be taken from their parents because mom & dad won't acknowledge that a child wants to be seen as a fairy princess or a purple dinosaur?

 

[impuretrash]

I can't believe we went from democrats like Obama and Hillary saying that "marriage is between a man and a woman" to "transgender lifestyle for 6 year old children is perfectly normal and healthy" in less than a decade.

 

[Silhouette]

I can't believe we went from democrats like Obama and Hillary saying that "marriage is between a man and a woman" to "transgender lifestyle for 6 year old children is perfectly normal and healthy" in less than a decade.

Makes you wonder where we'll be in less than a decade from now if this cult isn't stopped firm in its tracks? They used "gay teen suicides" to pump through normalizing deviant-sexualized topics as young as kindergarten. Now they're using "suicidal ideation!" as the means to ramrod parents into drugging their kids with non-FDA approved hormones to amputate body parts....OR ELSE YOU LOSE CUSTODY! The victim-bully cult knows how to work the violin strings in insidious harmony, playing judges like the fools they are.

I like what Justice Thomas recently declared to the nation:

"At some point we're going to be fatigued with everybody being a victim"

Justice Clarence Thomas says he's 'worn down' with victimhood culture

 

[Silhouette]

I can't believe we went from democrats like Obama and Hillary saying that "marriage is between a man and a woman" to "transgender lifestyle for 6 year old children is perfectly normal and healthy" in less than a decade.

Yes, it's ironic Hillary attacked LGBT cult member/her gay campaign manager Robby Mook when she lost on election night. She knows the cult is destroying democrats but has to tailor her morality to placate a tiny militant fraction of the DNC.

Is this going to be the new look for the DNC this year? Should go over well in the Rust Belt....

Decoding Satan: Hillary Clinton Endorses Obama’s Decree on Transgender Bathrooms

 

[TheOldSchool]

The kid will be 18 soon enough and will never have to see the parents ever again.

 

[Silhouette]

The kid will be 18 soon enough and will never have to see the parents ever again.

But that's not the point. The point is if the courts can take away a minor child because the parents refuse to play into their delusions or consent to them being drugged with non-FDA-approved hormones for later amputation of vital organs.

See the difference? You're introducing a strawman.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

They should call Jazz Jennings to testify for the parents. What was done to him is nothing short of severe abuse.

 

[TheOldSchool]

The kid will be 18 soon enough and will never have to see the parents ever again.

But that's not the point. The point is if the courts can take away a minor child because the parents refuse to play into their delusions or consent to them being drugged with non-FDA-approved hormones for later amputation of vital organs.

See the difference? You're introducing a strawman.

Kids suing for emancipation is nothing new. This kid wants to live with his grandparents because of an obviously toxic atmosphere his inadequate parents have created, probably for his entire life. With a little luck, the case draws out until he's 18 and can live life however he wants.

 

[Silhouette]

Kids suing for emancipation is nothing new. This kid wants to live with his grandparents because of an obviously toxic atmosphere his inadequate parents have created, probably for his entire life. With a little luck, the case draws out until he's 18 and can live life however he wants.

1. It's A GIRL, not "He".

2. Parents asserting reality in the face of childish delusions is not a "toxic environment".

3. Enabling delusions in children by helping them drug themselves with non-FDA approved hormones leading to surgical butchery (malpractice) of vital organs is CHILD ABUSE. Anyone promoting child abuse is not only themselves toxic, but also a danger to children.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The kid will be 18 soon enough and will never have to see the parents ever again.

But that's not the point. The point is if the courts can take away a minor child because the parents refuse to play into their delusions or consent to them being drugged with non-FDA-approved hormones for later amputation of vital organs.

See the difference? You're introducing a strawman.

Kids suing for emancipation is nothing new. This kid wants to live with his grandparents because of an obviously toxic atmosphere his inadequate parents have created, probably for his entire life. With a little luck, the case draws out until he's 18 and can live life however he wants.

People like this don't need physical help, they need mental help.

It sounds like she has responsible parents. Kids go through stages and are rather confused around that age. Doing something stupid now that can cost you the rest of your life is something a parent should be concerned about and intervention necessary.

It's just like when I hear about a kid getting a tattoo. WTF kind of parent would allow that, or pierced eyebrows or tongue?

Thank goodness there are still parents around who didn't hop on the leftist flake mobile.

 

[Silhouette]

People like this don't need physical help, they need mental help.

It sounds like she has responsible parents. Kids go through stages and are rather confused around that age. Doing something stupid now that can cost you the rest of your life is something a parent should be concerned about and intervention necessary.

.

Girls can do everything boys can do (with certain physical limitations, and they cannot inseminate) except cut off their breasts and become a male. Boys can do everything girls can do (except have babies) except chop off their genitals and become female. The problem with this whole deal is that transgender crap actually accentuates the polarized male or female stereotypes to such a degree that they convince children that if they have normal overlap desires within the social system, they "have to" amputate their bodies and play pretend. How about just let girls be tomboys and let boys cry every now and then, cook, sew or whatever. Drugging and amputation plays right into polarized stereotypes. So the LGBT cult is actually anti-liberation.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

People like this don't need physical help, they need mental help.

It sounds like she has responsible parents. Kids go through stages and are rather confused around that age. Doing something stupid now that can cost you the rest of your life is something a parent should be concerned about and intervention necessary.

.

Girls can do everything boys can do (with certain physical limitations, and they cannot inseminate) except cut off their breasts and become a male. Boys can do everything girls can do (except have babies) except chop off their genitals and become female. The problem with this whole deal is that transgender crap actually accentuates the polarized male or female stereotypes to such a degree that they convince children that if they have normal overlap desires within the social system, they "have to" amputate their bodies and play pretend. How about just let girls be tomboys and let boys cry every now and then, cook, sew or whatever. Drugging and amputation plays right into polarized stereotypes. So the LGBT cult is actually anti-liberation.

Given their suicide rate, it demonstrates how lost they are in their own little world. They make painstaking efforts to become the opposite sex, and when everything is done and they finally realize you can't just change from a man into a woman, they off themselves.

Cutting your package off doesn't mean you will have the ability to have or enjoy sex like a woman. What it really means is that you will never enjoy sex again for the rest of your natural life. When they finally come to that realization, there is no point of living.

Any shrink that believes or promotes that there are actually people in the wrong bodies and encourage mutilation should have their license revoked. What they should be doing is helping them to understand something most don't get until after they Fd themselves up, and that is what they desire is completely impossible.

 

[Silhouette]

Any shrink or doctor that does this to children should face a firing-squad.

But that will come later. For now democrats will face the firing squad in the Rust Belt 2018.

 

[Silhouette]

Given their suicide rate, it demonstrates how lost they are in their own little world. They make painstaking efforts to become the opposite sex, and when everything is done and they finally realize you can't just change from a man into a woman, they off themselves.

Cutting your package off doesn't mean you will have the ability to have or enjoy sex like a woman. What it really means is that you will never enjoy sex again for the rest of your natural life. When they finally come to that realization, there is no point of living.

Yes, true. So what we're looking at here is a court attempting to take away custody of a child because HER (or his) parents will not agree to urging her (or him) to mutilate her (or him)self to become sexually numb for life. Welcome to a nation in the 21st Century that has de facto been taken over by a deranged sex cult. Even deep into our judicial system which is supposed to be briefed by counsel on behalf of children as well as other parties to the case about children's well being/rights/benefits.

So deep has this cult gone into the Psychological association itself, that if a child is suicidal at the angst of not living up to extreme stereotypes she/he sees in the world, to the point of wanting hormone and amputation to escape that pain, counselors would lose their license to practice now if they suggested the cure was counseling instead of drugging and butchery ("sex change"-misnomer since it never happens).

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Given their suicide rate, it demonstrates how lost they are in their own little world. They make painstaking efforts to become the opposite sex, and when everything is done and they finally realize you can't just change from a man into a woman, they off themselves.

Cutting your package off doesn't mean you will have the ability to have or enjoy sex like a woman. What it really means is that you will never enjoy sex again for the rest of your natural life. When they finally come to that realization, there is no point of living.

Yes, true. So what we're looking at here is a court attempting to take away custody of a child because HER (or his) parents will not agree to urging her (or him) to mutilate her (or him)self to become sexually numb for life. Welcome to a nation in the 21st Century that has de facto been taken over by a deranged sex cult. Even deep into our judicial system which is supposed to be briefed by counsel on behalf of children as well as other parties to the case about children's well being/rights/benefits.

So deep has this cult gone into the Psychological association itself, that if a child is suicidal at the angst of not living up to extreme stereotypes she/he sees in the world, to the point of wanting hormone and amputation to escape that pain, counselors would lose their license to practice now if they suggested the cure was counseling instead of drugging and butchery ("sex change"-misnomer since it never happens).

I would wait until the conclusion of this case before passing judgement. The ironic thing is if a teen goes to the ER for a pain or injury of some sort, they will not work on the child until they get the signed permission of a parent or guardian.

 

[hazlnut]

Watch how fast USMB tries to dungeon this political topic..

Ohio Parents Could Lose Custody of 17-Year-Old Child Over Not Supporting Gender Transition

An Ohio court will soon decide if the parents of a teen girl — who identifies as a transgender male — should lose custody because they object to their 17-year-old child’s gender transition....The parents, though, see the situation much differently, according to their attorney Karen Brinkman. The girl’s parents believe giving the grandparents custody “would simply be a way for the child to circumvent the necessity of parents’ consent,”...

Yes, exactly. The cult of LGBT will have your obedience or you will lose your children.

Brinkman said the Ohio parents don’t believe their daughter is in a healthy mental state and able to make a decision as serious as beginning to transition. They have “done their due diligence contacting medical professionals, collecting thousands of hours of research,” she noted.

Wouldn't be hard to find physicians willing to take the stand and say "yes, the use of hormones on children that aren't FDA approved for such use, to enable serious mental delusions by preparing their bodies for unnecessary amputation of vital organs, while making them sign waivers (in that mental state) agreeing that no such thing as an actual sex change is possible, amounts to child abuse".

After all, if the doctors took the stand and defended these Frankensteinian practices on children/vulnerable adults, they''d at a minimum be guilty of malpractice. But actually they'd be guilty of child endangerment.

Moving forward, the court’s decision will have serious and far-reaching implications for the autonomy parents have to care for their minor children.

“If the judge rules in favor of the ideologically driven gender clinic, the ability of all parents to protect their children of any age from all aspects of this social and medical experiment will take a tremendous hit,” Michelle Cretella president of the American College of Pediatricians, told the Post.

Here's something else the President of the American College of Pediatricians told the press recently:
Transgender hormone blockers are ‘institutionalized child abuse’: pediatrician

WASHINGTON, D.C., October 17, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) — A nationally recognized pediatrician offered a jolting reality check about the dangers of encouraging children to think they are transgender and prescribing hormone blockers to prevent them from developing.

On October 11, the Heritage Foundation sponsored a forum on transgenderism at which Dr. Michelle Cretella said it is child abuse to facilitate gender confusion in children by helping them “transition” to the opposite sex.

So, will the Rust Belt sign up in 2018 for the party tied at the hip to this cult? Or will they resist like in 2016? (they're not just forcing your daughters to shower with boys in the locker room at school anymore folks...they're coming for your kids to take them away if you resist..!)

Selling Out Women To Transgender Bullies Helped Elect Donald Trump

Democrats Chose the Trans Agenda Over Women’s Rights
Of course, on many issues it did, such as equal pay for equal work and paid maternity leave. But in May 2016, right in the thick of the campaign season, Democrats betrayed women in favor of transsexuals. A joint Justice and Education department directive threatened to pull federal aid from school districts that would not allow transsexual access to bathrooms and locker rooms of their chosen gender. Twenty-three states immediately filed a lawsuit challenging that directive.

So, who will you vote for in 2018 folks? The LGBT party or the republicans? (the word "democrat" really doesn't exist anymore other than a faux label covering the rainbow armband underneath)

Won't this be a non-issue in less than a year?

 

[Two Thumbs]

Watch how fast USMB tries to dungeon this political topic..

Ohio Parents Could Lose Custody of 17-Year-Old Child Over Not Supporting Gender Transition

An Ohio court will soon decide if the parents of a teen girl — who identifies as a transgender male — should lose custody because they object to their 17-year-old child’s gender transition....The parents, though, see the situation much differently, according to their attorney Karen Brinkman. The girl’s parents believe giving the grandparents custody “would simply be a way for the child to circumvent the necessity of parents’ consent,”...

Yes, exactly. The cult of LGBT will have your obedience or you will lose your children.

Brinkman said the Ohio parents don’t believe their daughter is in a healthy mental state and able to make a decision as serious as beginning to transition. They have “done their due diligence contacting medical professionals, collecting thousands of hours of research,” she noted.

Wouldn't be hard to find physicians willing to take the stand and say "yes, the use of hormones on children that aren't FDA approved for such use, to enable serious mental delusions by preparing their bodies for unnecessary amputation of vital organs, while making them sign waivers (in that mental state) agreeing that no such thing as an actual sex change is possible, amounts to child abuse".

After all, if the doctors took the stand and defended these Frankensteinian practices on children/vulnerable adults, they''d at a minimum be guilty of malpractice. But actually they'd be guilty of child endangerment.

Moving forward, the court’s decision will have serious and far-reaching implications for the autonomy parents have to care for their minor children.

“If the judge rules in favor of the ideologically driven gender clinic, the ability of all parents to protect their children of any age from all aspects of this social and medical experiment will take a tremendous hit,” Michelle Cretella president of the American College of Pediatricians, told the Post.

Here's something else the President of the American College of Pediatricians told the press recently:
Transgender hormone blockers are ‘institutionalized child abuse’: pediatrician

WASHINGTON, D.C., October 17, 2017 (LifeSiteNews) — A nationally recognized pediatrician offered a jolting reality check about the dangers of encouraging children to think they are transgender and prescribing hormone blockers to prevent them from developing.

On October 11, the Heritage Foundation sponsored a forum on transgenderism at which Dr. Michelle Cretella said it is child abuse to facilitate gender confusion in children by helping them “transition” to the opposite sex.

So, will the Rust Belt sign up in 2018 for the party tied at the hip to this cult? Or will they resist like in 2016? (they're not just forcing your daughters to shower with boys in the locker room at school anymore folks...they're coming for your kids to take them away if you resist..!)

Selling Out Women To Transgender Bullies Helped Elect Donald Trump

Democrats Chose the Trans Agenda Over Women’s Rights
Of course, on many issues it did, such as equal pay for equal work and paid maternity leave. But in May 2016, right in the thick of the campaign season, Democrats betrayed women in favor of transsexuals. A joint Justice and Education department directive threatened to pull federal aid from school districts that would not allow transsexual access to bathrooms and locker rooms of their chosen gender. Twenty-three states immediately filed a lawsuit challenging that directive.

So, who will you vote for in 2018 folks? The LGBT party or the republicans? (the word "democrat" really doesn't exist anymore other than a faux label covering the rainbow armband underneath)

The government as parent has long been one of the most important goals of the left.

If you won't freely do as you are told, you will be forced.